[governance] oversight

[Avri Doria]

On 18 okt 2005, at 08.06, McTim wrote:

>> For example, when talking to the present ICANN management, I did not
>> have the impression that they were prejudicially opposite to  
>> moving the
>> legal seat of the corporation or changing its legal form.
>>
>
> This may be true. My point to Laina was that I don't think they will
> move to CH as Laina suggested (they have a Brussels office already).
>

I have long been a supporter of the Internationalization/host country  
agreement.  that does not mean, at least to me, that they actually  
have to move.  e.g, I don't see why it would be impossible for there  
to be a reasonable host country agreement with the US (and with  
Belgium or wherever else an office is located).  It is not a question  
of where ICANN is located, just which laws they are subject to.

a.

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance