[governance] The frustrating situation with the GNSO

[Thomas Roessler]

On 2005-12-21 05:31:12 -0800, Danny Younger wrote:

> We are now three weeks into the process with these
> Statements due in another two weeks.  The issues involved
> are rather complex and require a tremendous amount of
> discussion and analysis in order to arrive at substantive
> policy recommendations.

This mostly demonstrates one thing: The GNSO PDP is a nice
policy agreement process -- I could imagine to have it as the
"last call" part of a true policy development process.

As it stands now, this process is by no means a useful policy
development or policy analysis process.

(But, of course, that's hardly news -- it's well-known ever
since the process was first proposed.)

-- 
Thomas Roessler · Personal soap box at <http://log.does-not-exist.org/>.

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance