[governance] Comments related to the WGIG report

[Ian Peter]

Oops let me clarify following Avri and Milton's comments -


I'm only suggesting as regards cctlds, and that probably needs to clarified
further anyway to some special circumstances. Governments want to be in the
loop here particularly as regards cctlds - it's seen as a sovereignty issue
- and if you don't find a simple way to involve them they will find a
complex way to involve themselves.


Ian Peter

>>> "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> 08/12/05 6:11 PM >>>
In a minimalist model a GAC right of veto on root zone file changes
(to
replace USG divine rights here) satisfies all needs? Wolfgang's
clarifications are important.


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.7/70 - Release Date: 11/08/2005
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.7/70 - Release Date: 11/08/2005
 

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance