[governance] Caucus process comment

[Carlos Afonso]

My major concern: how to create expedite mechanisms for the caucus to 
follow what will happen (or is already going on) in the governance 
subcommittee?

--c.a.

Milton Mueller wrote:

>It seems to me that what the caucus should be discussing now is the
>structure, methods and nature of the proposed multistakeholder forum.
>There seems to be agreement with the WGIG report on its creation. But do
>we have, or can we develop, coherent ideas about how it operates, how it
>might be funded? Can we identify "wrong turns" in its design that would
>defeat its purpose or undermine its goals, so that we can be prepared to
>advocate against them at Prepcom 3? 
>
>  
>
>>>>"William Drake" <wdrake at cpsr.org> 08/04/05 12:19 PM >>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>Hi,
>
>I strongly agree with Ralf.  I cannot imagine how we would pull off
>something this grandiose given the time and available bandwidth, and
>it
>[...]
>

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance