[bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Thu May 23 06:45:30 EDT 2019
Dear Anriette
Thanks for this.
Fortunately, we changed the timing to after lunch (200 - 415 PM), and so
people should be able to attend both...
The timing and venue now is as follows
Just Net Colaition invites you to our workshop
*What do social movements need to do in the age of data? Towards a
digital justice manifesto*
Venue: Hôtel LAICO Tunis (RightsCon Venue), CARTHAGE 2
Date: June 11, 2:00-4:15 pm
Best regards
parminder
On 23/05/19 3:48 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
>
> Dear Sheetal
>
> Apologies if this has been pointed out already, but this date and time
> clashes with the JustNet Coalition Day event. Can that not be avoided?
>
> Thanks
>
> Anriette
>
> -----------------------------
> Anriette Esterhuysen
> Senior advisor on internet governance, policy advocacy and strategic planning
> Association for Progressive Communications
> apc.org
> afrisig.org
> anriette at apc.org
> On 2019/05/23 11:24, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Following on from my previous email, we will have our meeting to plan
>> the IGF day 0 event on Day 0 of RightsCon. See the details below:
>>
>> * Room Dougga
>> * June 11, _9am-12:30pm _
>> * Hôtel LAICO, Ave Mohamed V, Tunis, Tunisia
>>
>> If you can't make it but will be at RightsCon and would like to be
>> part of the discussions, let me know as I we can find time to meet
>> before/after the event. I've set up a thread for those who expressed
>> interest in this effort so I can add you to that too.
>>
>> Hope to see many of you soon!
>>
>> Best
>> Sheetal.
>> --
>>
>> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 11:30, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Thank you for your replies. I've also received a few replies
>> off-thread expressing interest in the effort.
>>
>> @Bach - thank you for the kind offer! We've secured a space at
>> the RightsCon venue but that would have been very helpful if not!
>> Will you be at RightsCon?
>>
>> On the way forward:
>>
>> * Please let me know if you are at RightsCon and would like to
>> attend that first meeting as there is limited space but of
>> course we'd like to accommodate everyone who can attend
>> * If you are not at RightsCon and still interested then please
>> do get in touch anyway, as we will be keeping everyone
>> updated and you can input into the meeting agenda (and maybe
>> even the discussions if we have good wifi)
>>
>> Best
>> Sheetal.
>>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:19, Bakhtiyor Avezdjanov
>> <ba2482 at columbia.edu <mailto:ba2482 at columbia.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Columbia University has a center in Tunis, and I could
>> inquire if we could use it for a Day 0 meeting, if it takes
>> place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bach Avezdjanov
>>
>> Program Officer, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression
>>
>> Email: ba2482 at columbia.edu <mailto:ba2482 at columbia.edu>
>>
>> Phone: 212 854 1591
>>
>> Twitter: @ColumbiaGFOE <https://twitter.com/ColumbiaGFOE>
>>
>> Columbia Global Freedom of Expression
>> <https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/>
>>
>> *Subscribe to our Weekly News Letter!
>> <http://columbia.us8.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=5b024e7a0c16e2779164ac24d&id=67263d095b>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:*bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>
>> [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>] *On Behalf Of
>> *Lee W McKnight
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:07 PM
>> *To:* Tapani Tarvainen; sivasubramanian muthusamy; Akinremi
>> Peter Taiwo; bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>> <
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; governance; Sheetal Kumar
>> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey
>> on the future of Bestbits: next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this. I agree with the Day 0 meeting idea.
>>
>>
>>
>> For me this feels quite deja vu-ish of the (2nd?) IGF in
>> Hyderabad where the Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights and
>> the DC on Internet Principles had a joint meeting to discuss
>> overlaps; we left with a Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights
>> and Principles. Which eventually led to the creation and
>> translation of the Charter on Internet Rights and Principles
>> among other positive outcomes.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, I am optimistic an IGC-CSCG (sp?) can move forward out of
>> this; ie among IGC's tasks going forward is to help energize
>> also the cross-CS coordination right?
>>
>> Which has to be done with BestBits 'Get it done' mindset and
>> methods embedded; vs IGC's at its worst eternal faculty
>> meeting feel (at times to this prof).
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> *From:*bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>
>> <bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>> on behalf of
>> Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>>
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 13, 2019 12:40:53 PM
>> *To:* Tapani Tarvainen; Sheetal Kumar; sivasubramanian
>> muthusamy; Akinremi Peter Taiwo; bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>> <
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; governance
>> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey
>> on the future of Bestbits: next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>>
>>
>> Following our discussions, and some discussions among some
>> of those of us who attended the last call four weeks ago
>> (notes & participants here:
>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture), see
>> below what some of us propose as a hopefully straightforward
>> plan going forward.
>>
>> * IGC and Bestbits list members work together to organise a
>> day 0 event at IGF
>> * Volunteers from both lists come together in an informal
>> steering committee to organise the event - you don't have
>> to identify as 'Bestbits'/IGC necessarily and can agree
>> how to approach the organisation of the event however
>> they see fit
>> * Members of other lists are invited to join once an
>> informal agenda has been put together
>> * Those who are present at RightsCon and interested in this
>> effort come together to discuss preliminary ideas - to
>> include the idea of focusing the day 0 event on reviving
>> IGC (and many others that have already been proposed)
>>
>> Although after all this to-ing and fro-ing it may sound like
>> we've now decided to just organise a meeting again I hope you
>> will agree that the discussions had so far, the interest and
>> commitment to global level coordination, would be usefully
>> served by collectively putting together an agenda that
>> responds to the interests of those committed to these efforts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please provide your views on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Sheetal.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 17:30, Sheetal Kumar
>> <sheetal at gp-digital.org <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for those who joined the call yesterday. Once I
>> have the recording I'll send it around. In the meantime,
>> you can see a short summary at the top of the etherpad.
>> Apologies for its staccato nature but it should provide
>> an overview of what we discussed:
>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>
>>
>>
>>
>> In essence, we discussed the reasons that these
>> discussions about civil society coordination have
>> recently re-surfaced and those on the call reiterated the
>> commitment to global-level coordination and the need to
>> work together in a less fragmented way. We looked at the
>> survey results and discussed the fact that although about
>> half of the respondents supported exploring a 'merger'
>> with IGC, around half also thought expanding the mandate
>> of the CSCG could be an option. However, those on the
>> call mentioned that the historical standing of the IGC is
>> important to leverage and there is complementary between
>> Bestbits and IGCs mandates. Therefore, we shouldn't lose
>> that in whatever we choose to do going forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> We discussed that proposing something more concrete to
>> the IGC would be helpful in terms of how a 'merger' could
>> work. We were cognizant of the limited number of the
>> people on the call, so we agreed to put something short
>> together and then to share it with you for your feedback
>> before sharing it with IGC. At the moment, we're working
>> on that simple proposal to share with you. I'll share it
>> shortly. If anyone else on the call wants to chime in
>> with more information please do.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have any questions, please do let us know!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Sheetal.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 14:10, Tapani Tarvainen
>> <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org
>> <mailto:tapani.tarvainen at effi.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I couldn't get bluejeans to work for me. I trust
>> someone will
>> report on the meeting.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>
>> On huhti 10 13:11, Sheetal Kumar
>> (sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>) wrote:
>>
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > This is just a quick reminder that we'll be meeting
>> in under an hour at 1
>> > PM UTC (see the link below).
>> >
>> > Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Sheetal.
>> >
>> > Meeting room details
>> >
>> > *Meeting URL*
>> > https://bluejeans.com/524189381?src=join_info
>> >
>> > Meeting ID
>> > 524 189 381
>> > Want to dial in from a phone?
>> >
>> > Dial one of the following numbers:
>> > +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > (see all numbers -
>> https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers)
>> >
>> > Enter the meeting ID and passcode followed by #
>> >
>> > Connecting from a room system?
>> > Dial: bjn.vc <http://bjn.vc> or 199.48.152.152 and
>> enter your meeting ID & passcode
>> >
>> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 13:39, Sheetal Kumar
>> <sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dear all
>> > >
>> > > As promised, please find below the details for
>> meeting us on *Wednesday,
>> > > April 10 at 1 PM UTC*. I've included the agenda
>> further below too.
>> > >
>> > > Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> > >
>> > > Best
>> > > Sheetal.
>> > >
>> > > Meeting room details
>> > >
>> > > *Meeting URL*
>> > > https://bluejeans.com/524189381?src=join_info
>> > >
>> > > Meeting ID
>> > > 524 189 381
>> > > Want to dial in from a phone?
>> > >
>> > > Dial one of the following numbers:
>> > > +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > > +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > > (see all numbers -
>> https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers)
>> > >
>> > > Enter the meeting ID and passcode followed by #
>> > >
>> > > Connecting from a room system?
>> > > Dial: bjn.vc <http://bjn.vc> or 199.48.152.152
>> and enter your meeting ID & passcode
>> > >
>> > > Any civil society stakeholders interested in the
>> discussion around
>> > > improving coordination are welcome so please
>> share with anyone relevant.
>> > >
>> > > Suggested agenda
>> > > 1) Grounding: why are we having this discussion/a
>> recap of what's happened
>> > > so far
>> > > 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> > > 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> > > 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 08:55, sivasubramanian
>> muthusamy <
>> > > 6.internet at gmail.com
>> <mailto:6.internet at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Dear Akinremi,
>> > >>
>> > >> I was wondering if the discussion so far has
>> reached the participants of
>> > >> the Governance list, especially the thinking
>> that "discussion about
>> > >> merging should be limited to each group". If
>> riseup.net <http://riseup.net> is working,
>> > >> then I do not have concerns.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank you.
>> > >>
>> > >> Sivasubramanian M
>> <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>> > >> twitter.com/shivaindia
>> <http://twitter.com/shivaindia>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:05 PM Akinremi Peter
>> Taiwo <
>> > >> compsoftnet at gmail.com
>> <mailto:compsoftnet at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi Sivasubramanian,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I don't understand what you mean by saying
>> igcaucus.org <http://igcaucus.org> mailbox is not
>> > >>> receiving messages. IGC is currently hosted on
>> riseup.net <http://riseup.net> mailing-list.
>> > >>> Please can you help me understand what you are
>> trying to do so as to be
>> > >>> able to help.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards.
>> > >>> Peter
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:12 AM sivasubramanian
>> muthusamy <
>> > >>> 6.internet at gmail.com
>> <mailto:6.internet at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I wasn't aware that it was formally decided by
>> the Bestbits list to
>> > >>>> discuss this list-wise. Posting a note here on
>> a different problem. The
>> > >>>> igcaucus. org mailbox is NOT receiving
>> messages, who is managing the
>> > >>>> Governance lists please?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Sivasubramanian M
>> <https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>> > >>>> twitter.com/shivaindia
>> <http://twitter.com/shivaindia>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:03 PM Akinremi Peter
>> Taiwo <
>> > >>>> compsoftnet at gmail.com
>> <mailto:compsoftnet at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Hi Sivasubramanian,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I think what was agreed was that the survey
>> should be limited to
>> > >>>>> Bestbit only and that the discussion about
>> merging should be limited to
>> > >>>>> each group. This would enable each group to
>> do a kind of an independent
>> > >>>>> assessment that would inform the decision of
>> whether the group should cease
>> > >>>>> or merge. Also, I could remember that some
>> folks on the IGC group wants IGC
>> > >>>>> to remain as it is.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> @Deirdre Williams I remembered I openly
>> shared some contacts on the
>> > >>>>> IGC list back then, which might be the
>> privacy issue you are referring to.
>> > >>>>> Aside of that, I don't think I was in the
>> picture of any privacy issue that
>> > >>>>> affected the group. Maybe Jeremy could throw
>> more light on this.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I could also remembered during the review of
>> CSCG, part of our
>> > >>>>> discussion was to accommodate regional civil
>> society organization in the
>> > >>>>> sphere of IG but the challenge of the
>> individual wearing many hat remains.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Regards.
>> > >>>>> Peter
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:41 PM
>> Sivasubramanian M <
>> > >>>>> governance at lists.riseup.net
>> <mailto:governance at lists.riseup.net>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a
>> limited response, only
>> > >>>>>> about 8 respondents.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC
>> list? Possibly the poll
>> > >>>>>> announcement hasn't reached those who are
>> subscribed only to the IGC list.
>> > >>>>>> (or because the title of the message says
>> "future of Bestbits" rather than
>> > >>>>>> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> It's been really great to see the level of
>> engagement in these
>> > >>>>>>> conversations about strengthening civil
>> society coordination, and I know
>> > >>>>>>> there's a lot of interest in not losing
>> motivation. The conversations have
>> > >>>>>>> been premised on a general interest in
>> changing the current situation
>> > >>>>>>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a
>> coordination network), and
>> > >>>>>>> collectively finding ways to strengthen
>> global civil society coordination
>> > >>>>>>> on the issues we work on.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the
>> survey which gathered a
>> > >>>>>>> broader array of views, have been helpful.
>> I attached a summary report of
>> > >>>>>>> the survey in my last email. At the last
>> IGF in Paris there was discussion
>> > >>>>>>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this
>> year. Before we do that however, it
>> > >>>>>>> would be good to discuss the responses to
>> the survey and agree a way
>> > >>>>>>> forward.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> I'm including a doodle below, with a
>> suggested agenda. It would be
>> > >>>>>>> great if you could fill it out by 29 March
>> so I can confirm the date and
>> > >>>>>>> set up a room.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> *Suggested agenda*
>> > >>>>>>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> > >>>>>>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> > >>>>>>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Looking forward to building on your energy
>> and contributions so far!
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar
>> <sheetal at gp-digital.org <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>>
>> > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thank you very much to those who completed
>> the survey. I have
>> > >>>>>>>> attached the anonymised results as a text
>> document, with a summary included
>> > >>>>>>>> at the top in case useful.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> As a next step I would suggest a split
>> call, with the first half
>> > >>>>>>>> spent discussing the results and
>> suggesting a way forward (45 minutes-1
>> > >>>>>>>> hour) and the second half, if deemed
>> necessary, with IGC founders and other
>> > >>>>>>>> key members of IGC. We could arrange that
>> as a separate call too.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey
>> have been to find a way
>> > >>>>>>>> to promote *more* civil society
>> coordination, and thus to change
>> > >>>>>>>> the current state of affairs. I hope that
>> they help in finding a way
>> > >>>>>>>> forward which does this and in so doing,
>> responds to the widest possible
>> > >>>>>>>> range of opinion. Should you have any
>> other suggestions on how to proceed,
>> > >>>>>>>> please do chime in! Otherwise, I'll send
>> around a doodle for a follow up
>> > >>>>>>>> call.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar
>> <sheetal at gp-digital.org <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> We've received a useful number of
>> responses but it would be great
>> > >>>>>>>>> to hear from more people about the future
>> of Bestbits. If you could fill
>> > >>>>>>>>> out the survey by COB this Friday that
>> would be much appreciated.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for
>> another call to decide next
>> > >>>>>>>>> steps next week.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> We've got some great responses to the
>> survey so thank you to
>> > >>>>>>>>>> those who have responded already.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> The survey is still open so please do
>> lend your views if you can,
>> > >>>>>>>>>> by using the link below. The survey
>> responses will feed into the next set
>> > >>>>>>>>>> of discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> <http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal
>> Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this
>> thread, please see a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> survey below to gather your views on
>> the future of Bestbits. Following a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> call on February 11 with members of
>> Bestbits, as well as members of IGC, it
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> was agreed that a survey would be
>> circulated to gather views of all members.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background
>> information note which
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions
>> so far, and links to the summaries of
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> calls.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing
>> list, you are invited to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> complete the survey. To inform future
>> discussions in a timely way, please
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> complete the survey *by 08 March*.
>> Should you have any
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> questions at all, don't hesitate to get
>> in touch.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal
>> Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in
>> the call yesterday. For
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> those who couldn't attend the call,
>> you'll find the list of participants
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and notes here:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the
>> possible ways forward for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous
>> conversation in December and the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In essence, there was general
>> agreement that both Bestbits and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGC have been facing challenges in
>> fulfilling their objectives,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> particularly when it comes to
>> coordination and we agreed to circulate a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> survey to both lists to gather
>> perspectives on four suggested ways forward
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> which were discussed on the call. It
>> was suggested that this survey with
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the broader communities feed into a
>> decision on the future of the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms. The survey will be
>> circulated shortly to both lists shortly,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and your participation would be
>> greatly appreciated.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal
>> Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that
>> the call on next steps is
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this coming Monday, 11 February from*
>> 4- 6 PM UTC*. The full
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> details are included in my previous
>> email and I've updated the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> etherpad
>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with those planning to attend.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal
>> Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the
>> doodle! It seems the best time
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on
>> February 11*. The full
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> details of the call, including how
>> to join, are below.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up
>> the room. Looking forward
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to speaking to as many of you as
>> possible on the 11th!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC
>> <http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc
>> <http://bjn.vc> -or-199.48.152.152
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Dial:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers -
>> http://bluejeans.com/numbers
>> <http://bluejeans.com/numbers>)
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in,
>> your phone number will
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear on the Bluejeans room page.
>> We would like to record and share the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> link with the BestBits network on
>> the mailing list. Please let us know if
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do not want the recording to be
>> shared on an open mailing list if you
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> call in.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the
>> Bestbits and IGC lists,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a
>> merger + other options
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of
>> challenges and issues faced in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger
>> of lists/establishment
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of new/maintenance of status quo -
>> using lists as information sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next
>> steps/agreement on process for decision
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've also added the names of those
>> who indicated they were available for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the call at this time. Of course, as
>> a Bestbits member you can join the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> call without indicating that in the
>> pad, this is just to have a vague idea
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of numbers.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13,
>> Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org
>> <mailto:sheetal at gp-digital.org>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the
>> engagement on this topic, and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks to those who have shared
>> their perspectives and the relevant
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents too.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we
>> agreed to touch base
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again in the middle of January to
>> agree a way forward. The discussions here
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide rich ground for the
>> discussion, and Farzaneh has kindly offered to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set up a conference call space for us.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for
>> our second call to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide next steps. This is a
>> suggested agenda:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of
>> challenges and issues faced
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in each network
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g
>> merger of lists/establishment
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of new/maintenance of status quo,
>> e.g using lists as information sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next
>> steps/agreement on process for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision making regarding future of
>> Bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged
>> the last call, we
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest only Bestbits members are
>> invited but that we also reach out to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some IGC folks to help provide some
>> background and inform the discussion
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the
>> doodle by the end of next
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a
>> time and send the conference room link
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10,
>> Deirdre Williams <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com
>> <mailto:williams.deirdre at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this
>> discussion with care, and have a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of questions which seem to
>> fall in line with what Nnenna and Jeremy
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are saying.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped
>> sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information/discussing things/
>> working together within IGC and Bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separately, would merging the two
>> groups again really improve participation?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look
>> at what needs to be done,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we want to do, how we want to
>> do it?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same
>> as the people who started
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC and Bestbits - same
>> objectives, same perceptions and perspectives, same
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions
>> it seems unlikely that
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we would make much progress.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please
>> consider IRPC (which many
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of us also belong to) which is
>> currently having some difficulty with
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifying volunteers to carry
>> out management tasks for the group.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means
>> to discuss issues and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find a common voice, but is this
>> the right way to do that now or do we need
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to devise something different?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09,
>> Jeremy Malcolm <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au
>> <mailto:jeremy at malcolm.id.au>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the
>> first Steering Committee
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Bestbits -
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more
>> information about how it was
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constituted and why?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had
>> become toxic and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had
>> been a while since it had
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At
>> the same time, the 2012 ITU
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WCIT was
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to
>> collaborate on joint action
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was important,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between
>> people both inside and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside of IGC
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the
>> first volunteer steering
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society
>> politics that had driven
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the IGC into
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt
>> Best Bits too. There were
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about
>> various participants having
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden agendas
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough
>> about their own funding.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So whereas the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been
>> fairly lightweight and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informal, pressure to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of
>> accountability resulted in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us investing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more
>> elaborate set of rules
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and processes.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too
>> heavy and people weren't
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes,
>> indicating that the more
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing
>> people who could
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resuscitate Best Bits,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections,
>> I'd be all for that. But I
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given
>> as much time to it as
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my
>> energy on my new nonprofit
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy
>> advocate, geek
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr
>> '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget -q -i
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - -O -
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a
>> subscriber on the list:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your
>> settings, visit:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty
>> is not money but
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge" Sir William Arthur
>> Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS
>> DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street,
>> London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London,
>> E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London,
>> E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44
>> (0)7739569514 |
>> > >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP
>> Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> > >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> > >>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber
>> on the list:
>> > >>>>>>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>> > >>>>>> Please send all replies to
>> 6.Internet at gmail.com <mailto:6.Internet at gmail.com>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> ---
>> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe:
>> <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net
>> <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>>
>> > >>>>>> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> --
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> > >>>>> Peter Taiwo Akinremi
>> > >>>>> about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
>> <http://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi>
>> > >>>>>
>> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> > >>> Peter Taiwo Akinremi
>> > >>> about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
>> <http://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi>
>> > >>>
>> <https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > > Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > > Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> > > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5
>> 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> > > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5
>> 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F
>> > E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> > bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
>> <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> > http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D
>> 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514 |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31 | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20190523/efde9149/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list