[bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey on the future of Bestbits: next steps

Sheetal Kumar sheetal at gp-digital.org
Thu May 23 05:24:05 EDT 2019 

 Dear all,

Following on from my previous email, we will have our meeting to plan the
IGF day 0 event on Day 0 of RightsCon. See the details below:

   - Room Dougga
   - June 11, *9am-12:30pm *
   - Hôtel LAICO, Ave Mohamed V, Tunis, Tunisia

If you can't make it but will be at RightsCon and would like to be part of
the discussions, let me know as I we can find time to meet before/after the
event. I've set up a thread for those who expressed interest in this effort
so I can add you to that too.

Hope to see many of you soon!

Best
Sheetal.
-- 

On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 11:30, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your replies. I've also received a few replies off-thread
> expressing interest in the effort.
>
> @Bach - thank you for the kind offer! We've secured a space at the
> RightsCon venue but that would have been very helpful if not! Will you be
> at RightsCon?
>
> On the way forward:
>
>    - Please let me know if you are at RightsCon and would like to attend
>    that first meeting as there is limited space but of course we'd like to
>    accommodate everyone who can attend
>    - If you are not at RightsCon and still interested then please do get
>    in touch anyway, as we will be keeping everyone updated and you can input
>    into the meeting agenda (and maybe even the discussions if we have good
>    wifi)
>
> Best
> Sheetal.
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 at 20:19, Bakhtiyor Avezdjanov <ba2482 at columbia.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Columbia University has a center in Tunis, and I could inquire if we
>> could use it for a Day 0 meeting, if it takes place.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please let me know.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bach Avezdjanov
>>
>> Program Officer, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression
>>
>> Email: ba2482 at columbia.edu
>>
>> Phone: 212 854 1591
>>
>> Twitter: @ColumbiaGFOE <https://twitter.com/ColumbiaGFOE>
>>
>> Columbia Global Freedom of Expression
>> <https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/>
>>
>> *Subscribe to our Weekly News Letter!
>> <http://columbia.us8.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=5b024e7a0c16e2779164ac24d&id=67263d095b>*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
>> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Lee W McKnight
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2019 3:07 PM
>> *To:* Tapani Tarvainen; sivasubramanian muthusamy; Akinremi Peter Taiwo;
>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net&gt < governance at lists.igcaucus.org;
>> governance; Sheetal Kumar
>> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey on the
>> future of Bestbits: next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this. I agree with the Day 0 meeting idea.
>>
>>
>>
>> For me this feels quite deja vu-ish of the (2nd?) IGF in Hyderabad where
>> the Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights and the DC on Internet Principles
>> had a joint meeting to discuss overlaps; we left with a Dynamic Coalition
>> on Internet Rights and Principles. Which eventually led to the creation and
>> translation of the Charter on Internet Rights and Principles among other
>> positive outcomes.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, I am optimistic an IGC-CSCG (sp?) can move forward out of this; ie
>> among IGC's tasks going forward is to help energize also the cross-CS
>> coordination right?
>>
>> Which has to be done with BestBits 'Get it done' mindset and methods
>> embedded; vs IGC's at its worst eternal faculty meeting feel (at times to
>> this prof).
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net <
>> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net> on behalf of Sheetal Kumar <
>> sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 13, 2019 12:40:53 PM
>> *To:* Tapani Tarvainen; Sheetal Kumar; sivasubramanian muthusamy;
>> Akinremi Peter Taiwo; bestbits at lists.bestbits.net&gt <
>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org; governance
>> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] [governance] Follow-on from survey on the
>> future of Bestbits: next steps
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>>
>>
>> Following our discussions, and some discussions among some of  those of
>> us who attended the last call four weeks ago (notes & participants here:
>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture), see below what
>> some of us propose as a hopefully straightforward plan going forward.
>>
>>    - IGC and Bestbits list members work together to organise a day 0
>>    event at IGF
>>    - Volunteers from both lists come together in an informal steering
>>    committee to organise the event - you don't have to identify as
>>    'Bestbits'/IGC necessarily and can agree how to approach the organisation
>>    of the event however they see fit
>>    - Members of other lists are invited to join once an informal agenda
>>    has been put together
>>    - Those who are present at RightsCon and interested in this effort
>>    come together to discuss preliminary ideas - to include the idea of
>>    focusing the day 0 event on reviving IGC (and many others that have already
>>    been proposed)
>>
>> Although after all this to-ing and fro-ing it may sound like we've now
>> decided to just organise a meeting again I hope you will agree that the
>> discussions had so far, the interest and commitment to global level
>> coordination, would be usefully served by collectively putting together an
>> agenda that responds to the interests of those committed to these efforts.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please provide your views on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Sheetal.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 17:30, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for those who joined the call yesterday. Once I have the recording
>> I'll send it around. In the meantime, you can see a short summary at the
>> top of the etherpad. Apologies for its staccato nature but it should
>> provide an overview of what we discussed: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In essence, we discussed the reasons that these discussions about civil
>> society coordination have recently re-surfaced and those on the call
>> reiterated the commitment to global-level coordination and the need to work
>> together in a less fragmented way. We looked at the survey results and
>> discussed the fact that although about half of the respondents supported
>> exploring a 'merger' with IGC, around half also thought expanding the
>> mandate of the CSCG could be an option. However, those on the call
>> mentioned that the historical standing of the IGC is important to leverage
>> and there is complementary between Bestbits and IGCs mandates. Therefore,
>> we shouldn't lose that in whatever we choose to do going forward.
>>
>>
>>
>> We discussed that proposing something more concrete to the IGC would be
>> helpful in terms of how a 'merger' could work. We were cognizant of the
>> limited number of the people on the call, so we agreed to put something
>> short together and then to share it with you for your feedback before
>> sharing it with IGC. At the moment, we're working on that simple proposal
>> to share with you. I'll share it shortly. If anyone else on the call wants
>> to chime in with more information please do.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have any questions, please do let us know!
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Sheetal.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 14:10, Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I couldn't get bluejeans to work for me. I trust someone will
>> report on the meeting.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Tapani Tarvainen
>>
>> On huhti 10 13:11, Sheetal Kumar (sheetal at gp-digital.org) wrote:
>>
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > This is just a quick reminder that we'll be meeting in under an hour at
>> 1
>> > PM UTC (see the link below).
>> >
>> > Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> >
>> > Best
>> > Sheetal.
>> >
>> > Meeting room details
>> >
>> > *Meeting URL*
>> > https://bluejeans.com/524189381?src=join_info
>> >
>> > Meeting ID
>> > 524 189 381
>> > Want to dial in from a phone?
>> >
>> > Dial one of the following numbers:
>> > +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > (see all numbers - https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers)
>> >
>> > Enter the meeting ID and passcode followed by #
>> >
>> > Connecting from a room system?
>> > Dial: bjn.vc or 199.48.152.152 and enter your meeting ID & passcode
>> >
>> > On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 13:39, Sheetal Kumar <sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Dear all
>> > >
>> > > As promised, please find below the details for meeting us on
>> *Wednesday,
>> > > April 10 at 1 PM UTC*. I've included the agenda further below too.
>> > >
>> > > Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> > >
>> > > Best
>> > > Sheetal.
>> > >
>> > > Meeting room details
>> > >
>> > > *Meeting URL*
>> > > https://bluejeans.com/524189381?src=join_info
>> > >
>> > > Meeting ID
>> > > 524 189 381
>> > > Want to dial in from a phone?
>> > >
>> > > Dial one of the following numbers:
>> > > +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > > +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > > (see all numbers - https://www.bluejeans.com/premium-numbers)
>> > >
>> > > Enter the meeting ID and passcode followed by #
>> > >
>> > > Connecting from a room system?
>> > > Dial: bjn.vc or 199.48.152.152 and enter your meeting ID & passcode
>> > >
>> > > Any civil society stakeholders interested in the discussion around
>> > > improving coordination are welcome so please share with anyone
>> relevant.
>> > >
>> > > Suggested agenda
>> > > 1) Grounding: why are we having this discussion/a recap of what's
>> happened
>> > > so far
>> > > 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> > > 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> > > 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, 6 Apr 2019 at 08:55, sivasubramanian muthusamy <
>> > > 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> Dear Akinremi,
>> > >>
>> > >> I was wondering if the discussion so far has reached the
>> participants of
>> > >> the Governance list, especially the thinking that "discussion about
>> > >> merging should be limited to each group".  If riseup.net is working,
>> > >> then I do not have concerns.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank you.
>> > >>
>> > >> Sivasubramanian M <
>> https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>> > >> twitter.com/shivaindia
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 1:05 PM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <
>> > >> compsoftnet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hi Sivasubramanian,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I don't understand what you mean by saying igcaucus.org mailbox is
>> not
>> > >>> receiving messages. IGC is currently hosted on riseup.net
>> mailing-list.
>> > >>> Please can you help me understand what you are trying to do so as
>> to be
>> > >>> able to help.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards.
>> > >>> Peter
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:12 AM sivasubramanian muthusamy <
>> > >>> 6.internet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> I wasn't aware that it was formally decided by the Bestbits list to
>> > >>>> discuss this list-wise. Posting a note here on a different
>> problem. The
>> > >>>> igcaucus. org mailbox is NOT receiving messages, who is managing
>> the
>> > >>>> Governance lists please?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Sivasubramanian M <
>> https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy>
>> > >>>> twitter.com/shivaindia
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 8:03 PM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <
>> > >>>> compsoftnet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Hi Sivasubramanian,
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I think what was agreed was that the survey should be limited to
>> > >>>>> Bestbit only and that the discussion about merging should be
>> limited to
>> > >>>>> each group. This would enable each group to do a kind of an
>> independent
>> > >>>>> assessment that would inform the decision of whether the group
>> should cease
>> > >>>>> or merge. Also, I could remember that some folks on the IGC group
>> wants IGC
>> > >>>>> to remain as it is.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> @Deirdre Williams I remembered I openly shared some contacts on
>> the
>> > >>>>> IGC list back then, which might be the privacy issue you are
>> referring to.
>> > >>>>> Aside of that, I don't think I was in the picture of any privacy
>> issue that
>> > >>>>> affected the group. Maybe Jeremy could throw more light on this.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I could also remembered during the review of CSCG, part of our
>> > >>>>> discussion was to accommodate regional civil society organization
>> in the
>> > >>>>> sphere of IG but the challenge of the individual wearing many hat
>> remains.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Regards.
>> > >>>>> Peter
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 9:41 PM Sivasubramanian M <
>> > >>>>> governance at lists.riseup.net> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> With apologies for cross-posting, I see a limited response, only
>> > >>>>>> about 8 respondents.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Is there a corresponding message on the IGC list?  Possibly the
>> poll
>> > >>>>>> announcement hasn't reached those who are subscribed only to the
>> IGC list.
>> > >>>>>> (or because the title of the message says "future of Bestbits"
>> rather than
>> > >>>>>> say "future of IG Civil Society".
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:41 PM Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> It's been really great to see the level of engagement in these
>> > >>>>>>> conversations about strengthening civil society coordination,
>> and I know
>> > >>>>>>> there's a lot of interest in not losing motivation. The
>> conversations have
>> > >>>>>>> been premised on a general interest in changing the current
>> situation
>> > >>>>>>> (namely Bestbits being inactive as a coordination network), and
>> > >>>>>>> collectively finding ways to strengthen global civil society
>> coordination
>> > >>>>>>> on the issues we work on.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Hopefully the conversations so far, and the survey which
>> gathered a
>> > >>>>>>> broader array of views, have been helpful. I attached a summary
>> report of
>> > >>>>>>> the survey in my last email. At the last IGF in Paris there was
>> discussion
>> > >>>>>>> of holding a meeting at RightsCon this year. Before we do that
>> however, it
>> > >>>>>>> would be good to discuss the responses to the survey and agree
>> a way
>> > >>>>>>> forward.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> I'm including a doodle below, with a suggested agenda. It would
>> be
>> > >>>>>>> great if you could fill it out by 29 March so I can confirm the
>> date and
>> > >>>>>>> set up a room.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/vyfn2zdxzt8wqzis
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> *Suggested agenda*
>> > >>>>>>> 1) Responses to the survey: a discussion
>> > >>>>>>> 2) Suggestion of concrete ways forward
>> > >>>>>>> 3) Meeting at RightsCon?
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Looking forward to building on your energy and contributions so
>> far!
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 13:43, Sheetal Kumar <
>> sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> > >>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thank you very much to those who completed the survey. I have
>> > >>>>>>>> attached the anonymised results as a text document, with a
>> summary included
>> > >>>>>>>> at the top in case useful.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> As a next step I would suggest a split call, with the first
>> half
>> > >>>>>>>> spent discussing the results and suggesting a way forward (45
>> minutes-1
>> > >>>>>>>> hour) and the second half, if deemed necessary, with IGC
>> founders and other
>> > >>>>>>>> key members of IGC. We could arrange that as a separate call
>> too.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> The aim of the calls so far and the survey have been to find a
>> way
>> > >>>>>>>> to promote *more* civil society coordination, and thus to
>> change
>> > >>>>>>>> the current state of affairs. I hope that they help in finding
>> a way
>> > >>>>>>>> forward which does this and in so doing, responds to the
>> widest possible
>> > >>>>>>>> range of opinion. Should you have any other suggestions on how
>> to proceed,
>> > >>>>>>>> please do chime in! Otherwise, I'll send around a doodle for a
>> follow up
>> > >>>>>>>> call.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks again.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:02, Sheetal Kumar <
>> sheetal at gp-digital.org>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> We've received a useful number of responses but it would be
>> great
>> > >>>>>>>>> to hear from more people about the future of Bestbits. If you
>> could fill
>> > >>>>>>>>> out the survey by COB this Friday that would be much
>> appreciated.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>> > >>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>> > >>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>> > >>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>> I'll then likely send out a doodle for another call to decide
>> next
>> > >>>>>>>>> steps next week.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Thank you!
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 11:58, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> We've got some great responses to the survey so thank you to
>> > >>>>>>>>>> those who have responded already.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> The survey is still open so please do lend your views if you
>> can,
>> > >>>>>>>>>> by using the link below. The survey responses will feed into
>> the next set
>> > >>>>>>>>>> of discussions on the future of Bestbits.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> http://bestbits.net/
>> > >>>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/
>> > >>>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> index&sid=528319
>> > >>>>>>>>>> <
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 09:37, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Following a call and discussion on this thread, please see a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> survey below to gather your views on the future of
>> Bestbits. Following a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> call on February 11 with members of Bestbits, as well as
>> members of IGC, it
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> was agreed that a survey would be circulated to gather
>> views of all members.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The survey is preceded by a background information note
>> which
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> includes a summary of the discussions so far, and links to
>> the summaries of
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> calls.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> http://bestbits.net/limesurvey/index.php?r=survey/index&sid=528319&lang=en
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> As a member of the Bestbits mailing list, you are invited to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> complete the survey. To inform future discussions in a
>> timely way, please
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> complete the survey *by 08 March*. Should you have any
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> questions at all, don't hesitate to get in touch.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to hearing your views!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 20:08, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you to those who participated in the call yesterday.
>> For
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> those who couldn't attend the call, you'll find the list
>> of participants
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and notes here:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We had a rich discussion about the possible ways forward
>> for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bestbits, building on the previous conversation in
>> December and the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion on this thread since.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In essence, there was general agreement that both Bestbits
>> and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IGC have been facing challenges in fulfilling their
>> objectives,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> particularly when it comes to coordination and we agreed
>> to circulate a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> survey to both lists to gather perspectives on four
>> suggested ways forward
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> which were discussed on the call. It was suggested that
>> this survey with
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the broader communities feed into a decision on the future
>> of the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms. The survey will be circulated shortly to both
>> lists shortly,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> and your participation would be greatly appreciated.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 16:47, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is just a gentle reminder that the call on next
>> steps is
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this coming Monday, 11 February from* 4- 6 PM UTC*. The
>> full
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> details are included in my previous email and I've
>> updated the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> etherpad <
>> https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with those planning to attend.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward to speaking to you then!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 10:07, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for filling out the doodle! It seems the best
>> time
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the call is* 4-6 PM UTC on February 11*. The full
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> details of the call, including how to join, are below.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to Farzaneh for setting up the room. Looking
>> forward
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to speaking to as many of you as possible on the 11th!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Bestbits call: Future pathways *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date and time: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11 February, 4:00-6:00 PM UTC <
>> http://worldtimebuddy.com/>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Online Meeting room: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join the Meeting:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bluejeans.com/819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via Room System:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Video Conferencing System: bjn.vc -or-199.48.152.152
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meeting ID : 819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To join via phone :
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1)  Dial:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.740.7256 (US (San Jose))
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.888.240.2560 (US Toll Free)
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1.408.317.9253 (US (Primary, San Jose))
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (see all numbers - http://bluejeans.com/numbers)
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2)  Enter Conference ID : 819760256
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that if you call in, your phone number will
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear on the Bluejeans room page. We would like to
>> record and share the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> link with the BestBits network on the mailing list.
>> Please let us know if
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do not want the recording to be shared on an open
>> mailing list if you
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> call in.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Proposed agenda: *
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Aim: *to discuss the future of the Bestbits and IGC
>> lists,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> including the possibility of a merger + other options
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues
>> faced in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> each network
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of
>> lists/establishment
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of new/maintenance of status quo - using lists as
>> information sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for
>> decision
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> making regarding future of the lists
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *RSVP on etherpad*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've put the agenda in this pad
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/Bestbitscallfuture>and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've also added the names of those who indicated they
>> were available for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the call at this time. Of course, as a Bestbits member
>> you can join the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> call without indicating that in the pad, this is just to
>> have a vague idea
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of numbers.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 14:13, Sheetal Kumar <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sheetal at gp-digital.org> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear all
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been great to see the engagement on this topic, and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks to those who have shared their perspectives and
>> the relevant
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents too.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In December when we had the call we agreed to touch base
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again in the middle of January to agree a way forward.
>> The discussions here
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide rich ground for the discussion, and Farzaneh
>> has kindly offered to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> set up a conference call space for us.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am circulating below a doodle for our second call to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide next steps. This is a suggested agenda:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Identification/agreement of challenges and issues
>> faced
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in each network
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Discussion of options, e.g merger of
>> lists/establishment
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of new/maintenance of status quo, e.g using lists as
>> information sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devices: pros and cons of each approach
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Discussion of next steps/agreement on process for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decision making regarding future of Bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Having spoken to those who arranged the last call, we
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suggest only Bestbits members are invited but that we
>> also reach out to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some IGC folks to help provide some background and
>> inform the discussion
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://doodle.com/poll/yzmbvibwp6n4s976
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If everyone could fill out the doodle by the end of next
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> week (Friday, 25 Jan) we can set a time and send the
>> conference room link
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sheetal.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:10, Deirdre Williams <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> williams.deirdre at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please excuse the cross-posting.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've been following this discussion with care, and
>> have a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> couple of questions which seem to fall in line with
>> what Nnenna and Jeremy
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are saying.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. If we had more or less stopped sharing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information/discussing things/ working together within
>> IGC and Bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separately, would merging the two groups again really
>> improve participation?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Is there a way for us to look at what needs to be
>> done,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we want to do, how we want to do it?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Who are "we"? Are we the same as the people who
>> started
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGC and Bestbits - same objectives, same perceptions
>> and perspectives, same
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> priorities?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without answers to these questions it seems unlikely
>> that
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we would make much progress.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Purely as an illustration please consider IRPC (which
>> many
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of us also belong to) which is currently having some
>> difficulty with
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> identifying volunteers to carry out management tasks
>> for the group.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Civil society still needs a means to discuss issues and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find a common voice, but is this the right way to do
>> that now or do we need
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to devise something different?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes for 2019
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Deirdre
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 14:09, Jeremy Malcolm <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeremy at malcolm.id.au> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/10/19 2:01 AM, Sheetal Kumar wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > For those who were part of the first Steering
>> Committee
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Bestbits -
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > could you share more information about how it was
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> constituted and why?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was because IGC discourse had become toxic and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dysfunctional, and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people were dropping out. It had been a while since
>> it had
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been able to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree on a joint statement. At the same time, the
>> 2012 ITU
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WCIT was
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming up, and being able to collaborate on joint
>> action
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was important,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so a few conversations between people both inside and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outside of IGC
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resulted in them becoming the first volunteer steering
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committee.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then the same civil society politics that had
>> driven
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the IGC into
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ground started to disrupt Best Bits too. There
>> were
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (misplaced but
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> damaging) allegations about various participants
>> having
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hidden agendas
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or not being transparent enough about their own
>> funding.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So whereas the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> original committee had been fairly lightweight and
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> informal, pressure to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopt more formal mechanisms of accountability
>> resulted in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us investing
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of time in creating a more elaborate set of
>> rules
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and processes.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As it turned out, this was too heavy and people
>> weren't
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivated to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engage in these new processes, indicating that the
>> more
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lightweight
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structure had probably been better.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If there was a group of willing people who could
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resuscitate Best Bits,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even without formal elections, I'd be all for that.
>> But I
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is. I personally have given as much time to it
>> as
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give, because I'm focusing my energy on my new
>> nonprofit
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prostasia
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Foundation now.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> echo "9EEAi^^;6C6]>J^=^>6"|tr '\!-~' 'P-~\!-O'|wget
>> -q -i
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - -O -
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize
>> Economics, 1979
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D
>> 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D
>> 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D
>> 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> E9E2 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B
>> E9E2
>> > >>>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > >>>>>>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > >>>>>>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > >>>>>>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > >>>>>>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2
>> > >>>>>>> 0603 DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>> > >>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> > >>>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> > >>>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>> Sivasubramanian M
>> > >>>>>> Please send all replies to 6.Internet at gmail.com
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> ---
>> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe at lists.riseup.net>
>> > >>>>>> List help: <https://riseup.net/lists>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> --
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> <
>> https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb
>> >
>> > >>>>> Peter Taiwo Akinremi
>> > >>>>> about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
>> > >>>>> <
>> https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb
>> >
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>>
>> > >>> <
>> https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb
>> >
>> > >>> Peter Taiwo Akinremi
>> > >>> about.me/petertaiwoakinremi
>> > >>> <
>> https://about.me/petertaiwoakinremi?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb
>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > > Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > > Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> > > DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > *Sheetal Kumar*
>> > Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>> > Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>> > T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> > PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F
>> > E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> >      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> >      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Sheetal Kumar*
>>
>> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>>
>> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>>
>> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
>> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
>> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> *Sheetal Kumar*
> Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
> T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
> PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603
> DD7F E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
>
>

-- 


*Sheetal Kumar*
Programme Lead | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
T: +44 (0)20 3 818 3258| M: +44 (0)7739569514  |
PGP ID: E592EFBBEAB1CF31  | PGP Fingerprint: F5D5 114D 173B E9E2 0603 DD7F
E592 EFBB EAB1 CF31|
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20190523/82828c1a/attachment.htm>

More information about the Bestbits mailing list