[bestbits] On the future of Best Bits and the pre-IGF meeting

Michael Oghia mike.oghia at gmail.com
Wed Jul 26 07:29:02 EDT 2017

Hi all,

Thanks for this Jeremy and your work with the group. While I prefer option
2 in general, I must admit that I am slightly confused at times about which
group is best for what -- for instance, if there's a civil society-related
link, should it be sent to this list, the IG Caucus list, CSCG list, or

While the example is seemingly trivial, the point is that it seems that
there is a lot of unnecessary overlap in these resources, so perhaps a bit
more centralization would be helpful (as far as the lists are concerned at
least, not necessarily the leadership). If we go with option 2, then I also
suggest we think about focusing the mission/mandate of this group, and also
differentiating it from the other civil society-focused IG groups.


On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Poncelet Ileleji <pileleji at ymca.gm> wrote:

> Dear Jeremy,
> Thanks for your email, I definitely concur and support Renata and will go
> with Option #2, I look forward too in working with others towards this
> process.
> Kind Regards
> Poncelet
> On 25 July 2017 at 23:26, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy
>> It is good to see the longevity of Bestbits, in its 5 year-old run.
>> This is a space which has done a lot for civil society and it will
>> certainly continue to do so.
>> There are many new groups and activists in civil society looking forward
>> to learn from the steps taken here and to collaborate.
>> I would like to help bring together the experienced and the new
>> participants here.
>> So my option would be #2 and I'd be glad to work with others interested
>> in thinking of new ways for Bestbits.
>> I believe rebuilding the Steering Committee (3 years old) is important
>> but also to bring in new voices who have ideas for the shape of the
>> platform and who are interested in participating of internet governance
>> communities.
>> If we can broaden this search for new members and collaborators among
>> ISOC Ambassadors, ICANN fellows, Youth IG movements, grassroots internet
>> freedom initiatives, it would be great.
>> Best,
>> Renata
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> wrote:
>>> 15 new members have joined this list since last week, and a new sign-on
>>> statement has been posted on our website, both of which mark an uptick in
>>> interest in this civil society network on Internet policy.  So I thought it
>>> would be a good time to gather your thoughts on future directions for Best
>>> Bits.
>>> For those who are new, this group was originally formed in 2012
>>> primarily to provide an action-oriented network of CSOs that could share
>>> information and coordinate their response to various current Internet
>>> threats, most notably at that time various proposals for the ITU World
>>> Conference on International Telecommunications.
>>> Since then it has been used as a platform for communication (mainly
>>> through this list, there have been others from time to time but none remain
>>> active), joint actions such as the sign-on statements that we host,
>>> coordination between people involved in similar activities, and an annual
>>> meeting held prior to the IGF.
>>> Around 2014 calls for greater accountability in the operation of what
>>> had, until then, been a fairly loosely and informally organised group, led
>>> to the establishment of a steering committee
>>> <https://bestbits.net/about/steering-committee/> and agreement on a set
>>> of rules <https://bestbits.net/wiki/main/procedures/>.  But that turned
>>> out to be counterproductive and so we have regressed to being ad hoc and
>>> informal again.
>>> This is fine, except that it means that it's difficult to raise funding
>>> for events, and that you have to rely on a benevolent dictator (which is,
>>> by default, me) to moderate the list and and keep the server ticking over.
>>> For now I'm OK with doing this, and our server remains functional and
>>> funded for the near future.
>>> Last year we turned over our regular pre-IGF meeting to co-ownership
>>> with the other major civil society networks working in Internet policy
>>> spaces, viz. the groups that are under the umbrella of the Internet
>>> Governance Civil Society Coordination Group <http://internetgov-cs.org/>.
>>> That went pretty well, marking something of a return to the original Best
>>> Bits vision.
>>> At this point, I don't have a clear personal vision for Best Bits going
>>> forward, so I would like to turn this question over to you, the
>>> participants to find out what you want to be done.  To break it down into a
>>> simple choice between two options, we should collectively choose between
>>> either one of these:
>>>    1. Maintain the current low-key status quo, and remove the currently
>>>    unused or underused features of our web such as our joint event calendar
>>>    (which currently doesn't have anyone to maintain it), along with most of
>>>    the resources under the "Tools" menu on our website.  Rely on other groups
>>>    to pitch in on an annual meeting.
>>>    2. Conversely, seek to reestablish a steering committee of people
>>>    with time, energy and vision to reinvigorate Best Bits and re-establish a
>>>    program of activities, which could include actively organizing and raising
>>>    funds for a broad annual civil society meeting, and/or drafting joint
>>>    statements, supporting fluid working groups, etc.
>>> I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
>>> --
>>> Jeremy Malcolm
>>> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>>> Electronic Frontier Foundationhttps://eff.orgjmalcolm@eff.org
>>> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>>> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>>> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
>>> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> --
> Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS
> Coordinator
> The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio
> MDI Road Kanifing South
> P. O. Box 421 Banjul
> The Gambia, West Africa
> Tel: (220) 4370240
> Fax:(220) 4390793
> Cell:(220) 9912508
> Skype: pons_utd
> *www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/
> <http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org
> <http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org
> <http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753
> <http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20170726/641cd108/attachment.htm>

More information about the Bestbits mailing list