[bestbits] Thanks! (and short observations on the IGF Retreat)

[James Gannon]

So I am really liking this, as I like the perspective, so playing devils advocate and slightly putting you on the spot, with the high level understanding and taking into account that I don’t expect it to be a detailed response, what would your suggestions or ideas or inputs be to those who are selecting people for the MAG, and for the MAG itself on how it should start looking at itself?
In short taking the hypothetical of ripping it up and starting again, what would the first set of review questions be to do a ‘lessons learned and inputs into starting again’?

Thanks for taking the time for this,

-James

From: <bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>> on behalf of Stuart Hamilton <Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org<mailto:Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org>>
Reply-To: Stuart Hamilton <Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org<mailto:Stuart.Hamilton at ifla.org>>
Date: Friday 29 July 2016 at 08:18
To: 'Wisdom Donkor' <wisdom.dk at gmail.com<mailto:wisdom.dk at gmail.com>>, "amelia.andersdotter at dataskydd.net<mailto:amelia.andersdotter at dataskydd.net>" <amelia.andersdotter at dataskydd.net<mailto:amelia.andersdotter at dataskydd.net>>
Cc: "bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>>
Subject: RE: [bestbits] Thanks! (and short observations on the IGF Retreat)

I’m not naive, I realise that there are politics involved in all of this. But reading your email it sounds to me that from the point of view of an effective organisation the MAG is broken. Rip it up and start again? :) What would you do?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20160729/7fb33177/attachment.htm>