[bestbits] input from past MAG CS reps pls? Re: Short listing proposal of candidates to CSCG for MAG2016

Tue Jan 26 17:07:57 EST 2016

Thank you folks for answering to my call for comments and clarifications.

All info is very helpful and I like the ideas on how to think of issues and
how to move those forward at MAG as suggested in detailed by Lea and
Ginger.

So, independently of who is picked (good lucky to all), that person should
establish a procedure of reporting back and asking for contributions from
the broader CS lists and coalitions. That will just increase that person's
legitimacy and power to then go back to MAG and negotiate such issues.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Lea Kaspar <lea at gp-digital.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> With apologies for coming to this debate slightly late, I'd like to build
> on Ginger's comments by offering a few reflections on my experience on the
> MAG this past year.
>
> For those of you who don't know me, I joined the MAG as part of last
> year's CS intake as one of the CSCG-endorsed reps.
>
> *In terms of workload* - as Ginger said, it varies depending on the
> period. In my experience, it can range from a minimum of 2 hours/month
> (needed to participate in the monthly calls) to a full-time job, especially
> as you get closer to the annual conference and depending on how much
> intercessional work you take on. To give you a rough idea - since joining
> in December 2014, I attended 3 physical MAG meetings (2xGeneva, 1xParis)
> and a number of meetings that took place on the margins, attended cca 10
> monthly coordination calls, actively participated in several ad hoc working
> groups (this included calls, work on documents, contribution to designated
> mailing lists), initiated or contributed to a number of threads on the main
> MAG mailing list, evaluated IGF session proposals (this alone took a few
> days), and coordinated one IGF main session (by the time we got to Joao
> Pessoa, this became a part time job).
>
> *In terms of impact *- I have personally found that every MAG member can
> make a difference and influence the debate, regardless of which stakeholder
> group they belong to. Due to the nature of the space which relies on
> voluntary efforts of its members, the MAG offers ample opportunity for
> those who are willing to roll up their sleeves and work with others to
> shape outcomes. When it comes to intercessional work, the ability to make a
> difference is even greater. The work that Avri has done on the BPF on
> multistakeholder approaches to governance is an excellent example of this.
>
> This is not to say that there are no structural obstacles or individual
> interests that one needs to deal with, which is particularly the case when
> it comes to initiatives that aim to change the status quo. However, on
> average, I have found that most arguments and initiatives are judged on
> their merit. If an initiative is supported by a critical mass of MAG
> members, it is unlikely that the Chair will ignore it or that another MAG
> member will be able to block it. What I'd say is crucial is being able to
> work constructively across stakeholder groups and to garner support from
> other MAG members in advance of putting a proposal forward. I learned this
> the hard way last year when I failed to get traction for a proposal to set
> up a MAG self-evaluation working group. Basically, we need hard-working
> people with a strong sense of vision and diplomatic skills that apply in a
> multistakeholder setting. I hope the CSCG takes this into consideration as
> they deliberate which names to put forward to DESA on CS' behalf.
>
> Thinking ahead, there are several things that we could do to maximise our
> impact. One thing that the private sector on the MAG does really well is
> structured and strategic coordination managed via ICC-Basis (who also
> coordinate private sector MAG nominations). This includes setting up calls
> and meetings before and during MAG physical meetings, as well as targeted
> informal outreach to non-private sector MAG members (like organising a
> social event on the margins of the physical MAG meetings). It might be
> worth thinking about how we could improve CS coordination going forward.
> For instance, is there scope within the CSCG mandate to consider acting as
> a coordinating mechanism for MAG-CS? Not sure if that is the appropriate
> solution, but improved CS-MAG coordination is something I think we could
> benefit from. Interested to hear what others think.
>
> Lastly, I agree with Ginger that it would be great to get a better sense
> from this community which issues we should be bringing to the MAG agenda as
> we move into the next annual cycle (both in terms of intercessional work
> and the annual conference itself).
>
> In the meantime, good luck to all the candidates - I'm excited to see how
> we can work together to further strengthen and improve the IGF.
>
> Best wishes,
> Lea
>
> ---
>
>
> *Lea Kaspar*
>
> Head of Programmes | GLOBAL PARTNERS DIGITAL
>
> Second Home, 68-80 Hanbury Street, London, E1 5JL
>
> T: +44 (0)20 3818 3258 | M: +44 (0)7583 929216
>
> gp-digital.org
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wish we had discussed this earlier - this is a great question. Here's
>> my quick answer after my first year on the MAG:
>>
>> The MAG sometimes requires a lot of time and energy, and other times
>> none. The first year requires a lot of patience, as we learn the ropes,
>> particularly how to manage 'negotiating' within the UN procedures. It also
>> requires patience and mentoring from experienced members.
>>
>> MAG members do have input, and are heard. Group work and strategies for
>> supporting each other are important, and we have CS members who are very
>> good at this. Candidates should be willing to learn, to adapt, and to work
>> in a group.
>>
>> I would say that MAG members also need more input from our groups.
>> Sooo... that said, I guess we have to ask for more input, and you have to
>> give more too.
>>
>> If anyone wants specific points or issues introduced, they should write a
>> contribution to the IGF right now, and then let the CS MAG members know
>> about it so we can work on it together, if appropriate.
>>
>> Cheers, Ginger
>>
>>
>>
>> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
>> DiploFoundation
>>
>> *DiploFoundation upcoming online courses:*
>> http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses
>> * <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses>*
>>
>>
>> On 25 January 2016 at 09:47, Carolina Rossini <carolina.rossini at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> It would be great if previous MAG CS members shared their experience
>>> here and also how "hard" or not MAG can be. And how much they were actually
>>> able to influence in the decisions.  That could help people decide their
>>> votes.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Miguel Ignacio Estrada <
>>> miestrada at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for all the candidates, +10 for Renata, I love everything she is
>>>> doing for her community and the region
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Burcu Kilic <bkilic at citizen.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I guess Nadira missed my endorsements. +1 for the three candidates -
>>>>> particularly +++++ 1 for Jeremy J
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:
>>>>> bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] *On Behalf Of *Nadira Alaraj
>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, January 25, 2016 10:23 AM
>>>>> *To:* <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
>>>>> *Subject:* [bestbits] Short listing proposal of candidates to CSCG
>>>>> for MAG2016
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear BestBits members,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to thank all of you who took part in showing your
>>>>> interest and those who endorsed, to the candidacy of MAG2016.
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is a summary of the correspondences on this regards.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As per requested by the CSCG to submit a maximum of 3 names and per
>>>>> the results of your endorsements. I would like to pass to the CSCG the
>>>>> names of the first three on the list below because the 4th on this list got
>>>>> minimal endorsements.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I appreciate if you have any other opinion, please let me know in
>>>>> couple of hours before sending my recommendations by the end of the day in
>>>>> my time zone which will be 10PM UTC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  Nominees
>>>>>
>>>>> Endorsement  with comments by Marilia Maciel
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 endorsements
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeremy Malcolm
>>>>>
>>>>> (USA)
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interest date: Jan 4)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to Jeremy, publicly thanking you for all the work you have put in
>>>>> the evaluation sheets this year. It would be of great importance to have
>>>>> Jeremy on the MAG to strengthen its outcome-oriented feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ephraim Percy Kenyanito,
>>>>>
>>>>> Becky Lentz,
>>>>>
>>>>> João Carlos R. Caribé,
>>>>>
>>>>> Carolina Rossini
>>>>>
>>>>> *off-list*: 2
>>>>>
>>>>> Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>>>>
>>>>> (Brazil)
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interest date: Jan 5)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to Renata, who has been such an active and vocal member of our
>>>>> Brazilian IG community and a contributor to global debates in ICANN and
>>>>> IGF.  Her academic expertise can be very useful to the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ephraim Percy Kenyanito,
>>>>>
>>>>> Becky Lentz,
>>>>>
>>>>> João Carlos R. Caribé,
>>>>>
>>>>> Carolina Rossini,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathalia Foditsch
>>>>>
>>>>> *off-list*:1
>>>>>
>>>>> Deirdre Williams
>>>>>
>>>>> (Santa Lucia)
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interest date: Jan 12)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to Deirdre who has a tremendous experience in IG issues acquired
>>>>> throughout the years, always showing in her positions a deep concern with
>>>>> the "human" aspect of our discussions and with the end user.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ephraim Percy Kenyanito,
>>>>>
>>>>> Becky Lentz,
>>>>>
>>>>> João Carlos R. Caribé,
>>>>>
>>>>> Carolina Rossini
>>>>>
>>>>> *off-list*:2
>>>>>
>>>>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>>
>>>>> (Fiji)
>>>>>
>>>>> (Interest date: Jan 22)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *off-list*:1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nadira Alaraj
>>>>> Liaise of BestBits nominees to the CSCG
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Nacho Estrada | @acmuzic <http://twitter.com/acmuzic>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Carolina Rossini *
>>> *Vice President, International Policy*
>>> *Public Knowledge*
>>> *http://www.publicknowledge.org/ <http://www.publicknowledge.org/>*
>>> + 1 6176979389 | skype: carolrossini | @carolinarossini
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>
>

-- 

*Carolina Rossini *
*Vice President, International Policy*
*Public Knowledge*
*http://www.publicknowledge.org/ <http://www.publicknowledge.org/>*
+ 1 6176979389 | skype: carolrossini | @carolinarossini
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20160126/4d5008ea/attachment.htm>