[bestbits] [governance] Pattaya Key Messages on the WSIS+10 Review: Voices from the Asia-Pacific Region

[Izumi AIZU]

Hi,


2015-09-10 15:59 GMT+09:00 Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com>:

> Yes, I was also thinking that how it would be difficult for either making
> real-time discussion [in which one have to be remain an active listener to
> others speaker and respond to what other have spoke] and documenting the
> notes at same time. I thing everyone was noting the abstract of his/er own
> discussion once have spoken. Notes taking would also have been interactive
> and could be further collaborative if the group members also take part as a
> reviewer and editor as third person, so if person A has missed some
> sentences, person C or D could complete or correct it.
>


​Yes, sometimes one first takes the floor and make comments, other one
takes short notes, as much as s/he could, then after finishing the
comments, she or he gets back to the note just taken and corrects and adds
what was said, or intended to say.

This makes more guarantee for accuracy, instead of reading the real-time
scripts on the screen taken by some stenographers, finding some errors but
have no means to correct, at least on the fly.

​


>
> By the way how the final message (Final-Pattaya-Key-Messages-2015.pdf) was
> developed? is it developed in the same way live contribution and
> interaction or only few people finalized the summary document?
>

​It is also documented in the later half of our Collective Notes, but it is
not easy to follow with the current (lack of) editorial works. We should
perhaps have Outline or Executive Summary and Table of Contents linked to
corresponding sections.

We were broken into 6 working groups with each subject, and one rep from
each group was selected to form an drafting group for the final message​,
they worked late into night, presented the draft next morning, round of
sessions on each para and sentences, drafting group met again, finalized
the text, one more round of discussion, online approval.
That was the rough process.

izumi



>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Imran
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>
> *To:* Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* "governance at lists.igcaucus.org" <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; "<
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 10 September 2015, 11:25
> *Subject:* Re: [governance] Pattaya Key Messages on the WSIS+10 Review:
> Voices from the Asia-Pacific Region
>
> Thanks Imran,
>
> yes, making real-time discussion and document at the same time was a very
> challenging, but also rewarding experiment - everyone was able to
> participate in the discussion, could see the other groups work in progress
> during the break-out Working Group sessions in real time, etc, etc.
>
> Instead of chatting or tweeting, all are documented in a single file, or
> linked file, so that we became much more structured and logical, could stay
> more focused.
>
> Making a poll in the middle of sessions was also quite effective, putting
> photos were fun and added more color.
>
> Worth to continue this kind of experience.
>
> izumi
>
> 2015-09-10 14:57 GMT+09:00 Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com>:
>
>
> Thanks Izumi for sharing the discussion document of Interactive and
> Interesting Sessions.
>
> Regards
>
> Imran
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>
> *To:* governance <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>; "<
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, 10 September 2015, 8:01
> *Subject:* [governance] Pattaya Key Messages on the WSIS+10 Review:
> Voices from the Asia-Pacific Region
>
> Hi, (Sorry for multi-posting),
>
> Some 38 people had a 3-day meeting in Pattaya on the WSIS+10 review and
> produced the following "Key Messages".
>
> Having seen no post [yet], I am tempted to share the link here as one of
> the participants of the meeting.
>
> http://www.wsis10.asia/
>
> It was an interesting exercise, and most of the process of the discussions
> are documented here.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dPU7Vv4W6hcRtOopMxXn6H_2e3LUiN4ckLdVv3FPQoQ/edit
>
> By using Google Doc, we were making and sharing realtime notes during the
> meeting, was very productive to make it an inclusive meeting in my view.
>
> Many thanks to the organizers!
>
> izumi
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
> Japan
> www.anr.org
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>


-- 
                     >> Izumi Aizu <<
Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
Japan
www.anr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20150910/2de048f8/attachment.htm>