[bestbits] Re: AW: [governance] Input on IGF 2014 format and main sessions

Anriette Esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
Thu Mar 20 05:17:03 EDT 2014


Thanks to all for input. Will send you summary of MAG meeting outcomes
on IGF 2014 format as soon as it is ready.

I think most of what you all suggested is being accommodated.. more or less.

Anriette


On 18/03/2014 12:24, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
> I agree here with Adam. Kepp the issues open as long as possible so that we can meet all the questions which are coming out from the procceses in April, May (inter aia the Ilves Report) and June (inter aliathe ICANN meeting in London with the high level GAC meeting and the ATLAS II).
>  
> One idea which worked well in recent EURODIGs are "flash sessions". 30 or 45 minutes presentations by one or two presenters (speaker has no more than 10 (or 2x5) minutes followed by q&a). The subjects of the flash sessions can be defined at a later stage shortly before the meeting. 
>  
> wolfgang
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org im Auftrag von Adam Peake
> Gesendet: Di 18.03.2014 11:08
> An: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Anriette Esterhuysen
> Cc: &lt,bestbits at lists.bestbits.net&gt,
> Betreff: Re: [governance] Input on IGF 2014 format and main sessions
>
>
>
> Hi Anriette,
>
> Thanks for asking. 
>
> To be honest, I'm not very clear what the difference is between main sessions and focus sessions -- what was the actual difference in Bali?  
>
> Perhaps the Secretariat and MAG needs to do a better job of bringing the organizers of the various workshops into planning of the focus sessions.  That didn't work well last, mainly I think because we hadn't thought through a new process (and to be honest I don't think 'feeder workshops' have ever worked and are unlikely to, a conference schedule can't permit.)
>
> I think we saw in Bali that topics on current interests work well.  Development, tried yet again, and not satisfactory yet again (if going to do such sessions it must include a majority of developing country participants, and contributors who are development experts rather than well meaning policy geeks.)
>
> Did ypu find the policy questions helpful?  Were they addressed in the sessions and did they add anything?  I'm not sure they were widely used in most sessions.  They seemed to be used as a bit of an after thought. 
>
> Of the themes, suggest it would be helpful to leave a large block of time (50%) to address NETmundial outcomes and what we are learning from other processes.  By mid-summer we'll have an idea of what's going into ITU plenipot, WSIS etc.  React to what's happening rather than more on the same old themes.
>
> What does the overarching theme mean?  Too many vague sub-themes, they provide little or no guidance to those submitting workshop proposals, and no help to MAG when assessing what's relevant/not.
>
> Adam 
>
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> There is a MAG meeting tomorrow and I would like your input on session formats.
>>
>> Should there be 'main sessions' or focus sessions?  How many? One a day or only on the first day and the last day?
>>
>> What should the format be of these sessions?
>>
>> Should there be feeder workshops? Or Round Tables on a theme?
>>
>> Should the MAG make an open call for policy questions around which these focus/main sessions can be built?
>>
>> Looking at the main and sub themes for this year's IGF, on which topics do you feel main sessions/focus sessions are needed?
>>
>>
>> Proposed Overaching Theme and Sub Themes for IGF 2014
>>
>>
>> Proposed Overarching Theme: Connecting Continents for Enhanced Multistakeholder Internet Governance
>>
>> Proposed Sub Themes:
>>
>>       * Policies enabling Access
>>       * Content Creation, Dissemination and Use
>>       * Internet as engine for growth & development
>>       * IGF & The Future of the Internet ecosystem
>>       * Enhancing Digital Trust
>>       * Internet and Human Rights
>>       * Critical Internet Resources
>>       * Emerging Issues
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Anriette
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> anriette esterhuysen
>> anriette at apc.org
>>
>> executive director, association for progressive communications
>>
>> www.apc.org
>>
>> po box 29755, melville 2109
>> south africa
>> tel/fax +27 11 726 1692
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
>

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
executive director, association for progressive communications
www.apc.org
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140320/6eeb40d8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list