[bestbits] Request for input: draft text calling for CS input into negotiations on WSIS+10 modalities

[Deborah Brown]

Hi Mike,

See comments below.

*From:* "michael gurstein" <gurstein at gmail.com>
*Date:* January 29, 2014 at 3:45:30 AM EST
*To:* "'Deborah Brown'" <deborah at accessnow.org>, <
bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
*Subject:* *RE: [bestbits] Request for input: draft text calling for CS
input into negotiations on WSIS+10 modalities*

Since this letter appears to be presented as being on behalf of "CS" (as a
whole) I believe that the Community Informatics community would be
interested in helping to "develop... a joint letter to the co-facilitators".


Great that the Community Informatics community would be interested in
helping. To clarify, the intention is not to speak on behalf of CS "as a
whole" but rather whoever signs it. I think this can be rather easily fixed
by inserting "the undersigned" in a few places and I would welcome your
suggestions to improve it further if it's still not clear.

I would also draw your attention to my detailed comments to what appears to
have been an earlier version of the "Initialanalysis" document which does
not seem to have been taken notice of in the updated version. Nor, I should
add, have I/we been invited to comment on any of the updated versions of
the analysis.

Thanks for sending your detailed comments. I found this feedback very
useful, especially with regards to the need for a serious/independent
review and to channel feedback from the grassroots level.  To clarify, the
analysis I sent yesterday was the same document circulated initially in
November. Because it became clear that the review issue was taken off the
table for the time being (bc of and time constraints) we never managed to
update the document, but very much looking forward to your comments on this
draft text.

M

All the best,
Deborah

*From:* bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [
mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net<bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net>]
*On Behalf Of *Deborah Brown
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 28, 2014 9:23 PM
*To:* <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
*Subject:* [bestbits] Request for input: draft text calling for CS input
into negotiations on WSIS+10 modalities



Dear all,



As you may be aware, negotiations over the modalities for the overall WSIS
review are resuming at the UN General Assembly in NY. After failing to
reach an agreement by their deadline in December, the General Assembly
decided to appoint two co-facilitators to convene open intergovernmental
consultations to finalize the modalities for the overall WSIS review (A
/C.2/68/L.73-attached). It was recently announced that the co-facilitators
are *Finland* and *Tunisia*. UNGA has until the end of March to adopt a new
resolution finalizing the modalities for the WSIS review.



As you might remember, there was an earlier draft of the resolution
introduced by the G77 (A/C.2/68/L.40- attached), which called for the
formation of an inter-governmental preparatory committee to set the agenda,
finalize the outcome documents, and decide on modalities of participation
of other stakeholders (OP22) for a 10-year review summit (OP21).  This
proved to be too controversial which is in a large part why it was decided
to continue the negotiating. (See Sam Dickinson's post for more info:
http://linguasynaptica.com/unga-68-ict4d-resolution/)



Given the approach that the draft resolution initially took, I am writing
to see if there is interest developing a joint letter to the
co-facilitators to communicate a desire by members of civil society to
engage in the overall review process and establish concrete mechanisms for
contributions. My sense is that if there is an opportunity to do so it is
now, while governments are negotiating the modalities.



I drafted some points that could serve as the basis for a joint letter (see
below) with input from a few people who have been following the WSIS review
process, including the small group (Matthew, Lea, Joana, and myself) that
worked on some initial analysis of the early draft of the ICT4D resolution
(attached).



The goal of this letter is to demonstrate an interest and willingness of CS
to engage in the WSIS review process now, and have the opportunity to help
shape the outcome from the beginning. * We're very interested in your
thoughts on this draft and would welcome feedback, suggested edits, etc. by
the end of your day Monday, 3 February*. If there's support, it would be
great to post the final letter on the Best Bits website for endorsement
next week.



Here's the draft text:



Your Excellencies,



We are writing as members of civil society deeply engaged in Internet
governance and ICT for development issues. Some/many of us have been
engaged in this field since the inception of WSIS. At the outset, we would
like to congratulate you on your appointment as co-facilitators of the
General Assembly's open intergovernmental consultations to finalize the
modalities for the overall review of the implementation of the outcomes of
the World Summit on the Information Society.

We feel strongly that all stages of the overall WSIS review process should
be open to all interested stakeholders, and as members of global civil
society would welcome the opportunity to input into these informal
consultations .

The modalities for the overall review must embody the spirit of WSIS and
the progress that has been made since 2005, as exemplified in the various
multi-stakeholder processes such as the Multistakeholder Preparatory
Platform for the WSIS High Level Event and the UNESCO WSIS+10 Review Event,
but also the Internet Governance Forum, the Working Group on Internet
Governance, the Working Group on IGF improvements, and the Working Group on
Enhanced Cooperation.

We envision an overall WSIS review that renews and revives commitment to
the Geneva principles' vision of a "people-centred, inclusive,
development-oriented and non-discriminatory Information Society", is rooted
in the international human rights framework, and builds on the achievements
and addresses the challenges experienced in the 10 years since
WSIS. Additionally, we believe that the overall WSIS review should seek to
find synergies and synchronicities with the post-2015 development agenda,
and in this context we would encourage the development of more
concrete, measurable targets relating to ICTs and development.

To conclude, we consider it critical that the modalities of the overall
WSIS review take into account the viewpoints of all stakeholders and
establish concrete mechanisms for civil society to channel its
contributions, including through remote participation. Therefore, we, as
members of global civil society, are keen to input into the informal
consultations that you are facilitating and look forward to engaging more
formally in the preparatory process to the overall review.



Sincerely,



xx







Kind regards,

Deborah



-- 

Deborah Brown

Senior Policy Analyst

Access | accessnow.org

rightscon.org



@deblebrown

PGP 0x5EB4727D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140129/ecde15ba/attachment.htm>