[bestbits] Re: [governance] list of important questions to be delivered to LOC before 27th meeting
Nnenna Nwakanma
nnenna75 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 26 08:40:04 EST 2014
Hi Adam, Marillia and all
I would like to throw in 2 more questions.
1. Can we have a Day 0? For organisations that may want to have a
preparatory event?
2. Will there be a space for exhibition, demos?
Thanks
N
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:
> Thanks Marilia
>
> Hi everyone...
>
> Any comments on Marilia's email?
>
> If the number who can attend in person is limited, any thoughts on how
> seats might be allocated?
>
> The organizing group are committed to remote access, we've heard that.
> Any thoughts no how to integrate remote participation?
>
> Will report after tomorrow's meeting (Monday 27th, 09:00 - 17:00 Brazil
> local time).
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:42 AM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> >
> > These are very good questions.The agenda for the meeting of the
> executive committee on the 27th is not yet defined. As it stands today, the
> topics on the agenda will likely be:
> >
> >
> > - Committee work plan (roadmap)
> >
> > - Participation criteria for the meeting
> >
> > - Meeting agenda
> >
> > - Meeting format
> >
> > - Kind of expected outcomes
> >
> > - Public consultation
> >
> >
> > As you can see, topics are broad. If there are questions to further
> explore these points or if there are concrete proposals on how to address
> them, Adam and I would be happy to channel ideas into the meeting.
> >
> >
> > Best
> >
> > MarĂlia
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Joana, thanks so much.
> >
> > Adding in a few more :
> >
> > As documents are invited, w. A cut off date, of March 1, how will this
> WG propose how to summarize submissions?
> > Will all subm$issions be posted in entirety on a web site for public
> free access?
> >
> > Are all submissions treated equally, or will govt. Contributions be
> given priority?
> >
> >
> > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:52:24
> > To: <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>; <ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu>; <
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> > Subject: [governance] list of important questions to be delivered to LOC
> > before 27th meeting
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > The reps from the Committees will assemble on the 27th and there are a
> set of different important logistical question to the addressed asap in
> order to help our preparation. These are what I've listed in different
> interactions with different lists:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > * Is it going to be invitation only?
> > * If invite only, what are the criteria for invitation? Who decides who
> gets invited?
> > * There will be travel support?
> > * If yes, does people who is willing to attend by it's own cost can also
> be invited? What are the restrictions?
> > * There will be remote participation?
> > * What does participation mean? Are all participants able to speak and
> contribute to decision-making if the meeting is indeed outcome oriented?
> > * Is the final deadline for proposals really March, 1st (in the middle
> of Brazilian Carnival)
> > As the lack of final/clear/formal answers on these issues (and maybe
> others) is influencing the preparation process and our ability to plan our
> actions, I think this questions, and any additions (as far as related to
> logistics), should be formally delivered to LOC, even before the meeting,
> by Friday at the most.
> >
> > I've posed them to 1net steering as well, as it seams Adiel will be
> attending that particular meeting. So they can also be posed with support
> of other stakeholder groups.
> >
> > But, as 1net is not our only channel, it would be good if we could also
> reassure that our elected CS reps on EC (Adam and Marilia) have these (or
> more) questions formally reinforced also as a priority from their
> constituencies in the meeting on the 27th. (sorry for the cross post)
> >
> >
> > +1? Suggestions for more questions?
> >
> >
> > best
> >
> > joana
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> >
> > Joana Varon Ferraz
> > @joana_varon
> > PGP 0x016B8E73
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> > To be removed from the list, visit:
> > http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >
> > For all other list information and functions, see:
> > http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> > http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >
> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > MarĂlia Maciel
> > Pesquisadora Gestora
> > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> >
> > Researcher and Coordinator
> > Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
> > http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> >
> > DiploFoundation associate
> > www.diplomacy.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> > http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140126/292d7947/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list