[bestbits] Re: [governance] Re: [CoNE-elist 632] Agenda EMC meeting

Marilia Maciel mariliamaciel at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 13:15:35 EST 2014


>
>
> It might be helpful is we had a discussion about how we will get from the
> first documents, that is the synthesis paper and contributions (available
> around March 15th I think), to documents we can take into the meeting on
> April 23rd. What kind of output would we like?  What's our goal?
>

Exactly. We need to discuss our goals and build strategy to achieve them.
In addition, we can certainly present inputs about how to build the draft
input document, how to put it online under public consultation before the
Meeting and how to better take advantage of our time during the conference.
We should push and offer suggestions for the implementation of join letter
on the deliberative processes for the meeting.
Marília


>
>
> > Best
> > Marília
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> > Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Parminder, all I know is that this document will be an initial
> > > input to the meeting. That's all. I have no idea of how the
> > > discussions in the meeting are going to take place. This was not
> > > discussed by the EMC and it is hard to predict, I think.
> >
> > Hi Marilia
> >
> > At the Paris WSIS+10 there was a draft document provided by UNESCO as
> > initial input into the process that created the output document. This
> > initial input got changed to the extent that it was possible, during the
> > very limited and really quite insufficient amount of time available, to
> > reach consensus in favor of proposed changes.
> >
> > If that kind of process is used again, then it is I think quite
> > plausible to predict that the outcome document would resemble the
> > "initial input".
> >
> > I'd strongly prefer the work of the São Paulo meeting to start not
> > with a pre-prepared initial draft document, but with a blank slate. The
> > compilation of contributions is still important of course, but as a
> > compilation of ideas that the participants of the meeting can draw
> > upon for proposing additions to the (initially empty) working document.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Norbert
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Marília Maciel
> > Pesquisadora Gestora
> > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> >
> > Researcher and Coordinator
> > Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
> > http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> >
> > DiploFoundation associate
> > www.diplomacy.edu
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> > To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> >     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>


-- 
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio

Researcher and Coordinator
Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts

DiploFoundation associate
www.diplomacy.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140221/5a168fe7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list