[bestbits] RSVP - discussion of governance mechanisms (was Re: substantive proposals for Brazil summit - IG)

[David Cake]

Conversely, you should be careful not to conflate disagreeing with particular strategies for increasing accountability and transparency (your own or others) with not being taking accountability and transparency seriously. 

Regards

	David

On 8 Feb 2014, at 2:40 pm, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:

> I also have concerns with those who don't insist on full accountability and transparency for multistakeholder processes or who equate an insistence on accountability and transparency as somehow being "opposition" to those processes.
> 
> M
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net [mailto:bestbits-request at lists.bestbits.net] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:34 PM
> To: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
> Subject: Re: [bestbits] RSVP - discussion of governance mechanisms (was Re: substantive proposals for Brazil summit - IG)
> 
> 
> 
> On 07-Feb-14 14:06, Ian Peter wrote:
> 
>> that can hide behind multistakeholderism (or even behind opposition to
>> multistakeholderism)
> 
> 
> Thanks you for include the parenthetical.  To be honest that is my greater concerns.
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140214/f59b03cb/attachment.sig>