[bestbits] [governance] From Confusion to Clarification

Nick Ashton-Hart nashton at consensus.pro
Mon Dec 1 13:38:06 EST 2014


+1 and me too on the updating.

On 1 Dec 2014, at 11:41, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Might be one of those things that is more suited to a wiki or some other online work that can be updated as necessary.
> 
> And if one does create one of those with the proper format, it can be gathered into an ebook  or an printed object whenever wanted.  
> 
> I like the idea of a an online development that combines new writings with existing writings that is under constant update, and would be willing to contribute to that sort of ongoing dynamic effort if we aable to get one organized.
> 
> avri
> On 01-Dec-14 10:54, Carlos Afonso wrote:
>> The only concern I have on yet another good proposal from Wolf is that a book is static while the IG processes are in a complex, difficult dynamic. I wonder if the book could be a "photograph" of something which would be more or less regularly updated in a corresponding collaborative portal? 
>> 
>> fraternal regards 
>> 
>> --c.a. 
>> 
>> On 12/1/14 10:25, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     I propose that we start to work on what I call a “Civil Society 
>>>     Internet Governance Handbook”. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sala: Let's do this! 
>>> 
>>>     This handbook would allow all CS groups within the CSCG to present 
>>>     their own individual points of views so that everybody knows what 
>>>     the positions are. The book could be structured into four main chapters: 
>>> 
>>>     1.      Human Rights (Access, Freedom of Expression, Privacy etc.) 
>>>     2.      Security (Cyberwar, Cyberterrorism, Cybercrime etc.) 
>>>     3.      Economic Development (Market domination, competition, 
>>>     infrastructure development etc.) 
>>>     4.      Technical Coordination (Names, Numbers, Protocols etc.) 
>>> 
>>>     Each of the six groups under the CSCG (IGC, BB, JNC, NCSG, Diplo, 
>>>     APC) could nominate four authors (one for each chapter). Each author 
>>>     would be free to argue for her/his position (five to maximum teen 
>>>     pages). There is no need for consensus. Every author would be free 
>>>     to present her/his radical, moderate, liberal and whatsoever 
>>>     position on one of the four main issues. 
>>> 
>>>     Such a compendium would help to bring more transparency into the 
>>>     process and would enable a more fact based discussion in the IG 
>>>     events ahead of us. 
>>> 
>>>     We could deliver this as an e-book (probably with an Annex with main 
>>>     official texts as Tunis Agenda, Sao Paulo Principles, UN Resolutions 
>>>     etc.) until the May 2015 Sessions in Geneva. In total this book 
>>>     would be around 250 pages. If we find a sponsor we could publish 
>>>     this for the New York event in December 2015. Such a book would seen 
>>>     by the rest of the IG Community as a helpful contribution, it would 
>>>     strengthen the role of CS in the emerging IG multistakeholder 
>>>     mechanisms and would be also an input into the WSIS 10+ process. 
>>> 
>>>     The chair of the CSCG (together with the co-chairs from the six 
>>>     groups) would be the editor. 
>>> 
>>>     Any comment? 
>>> 
>>>     Wolfgang 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>     ____________________________________________________________ 
>>>     You received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
>>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org> 
>>>     To be removed from the list, visit: 
>>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing 
>>> 
>>>     For all other list information and functions, see: 
>>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance 
>>>     To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see: 
>>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/ 
>>> 
>>>     Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20141201/4631db72/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 670 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20141201/4631db72/attachment.sig>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list