[bestbits] [governance] From Confusion to Clarification
Nick Ashton-Hart
nashton at consensus.pro
Wed Dec 3 07:59:02 EST 2014
With respect to this example - and others with a long history that predates the Internet, but which apply fully online, I think you have to start with the source, which is not the NetMundial principles, but international human rights law and the documents that recognise how it applies online.
> On 3 Dec 2014, at 04:15, Gunela Astbrink <g.astbrink at gsa.com.au> wrote:
>
> Totally support Wolf's suggestion.
>
> The content in, for example, the Human Rights section should at least cover all the Principles set out in the NetMundial Statement. Each of these Human Rights Principles can be explored in depth by the authors and analyses of other principles added if needed. Importantly, we don't want to overlook any of the existing principles.
>
> A positive and exciting project!
>
> Gunela
>
> Sylvia Cadena said the following on 3/12/14 12:44 :
>> That is a great idea. Maybe worth checking some tools/methodology for
>> sprint-writing? When I supported the Wireless Networking for the
>> Development World book first editions, It was very useful to organize
>> the chapters and have sprints to write them and have a whole book ready
>> for a specific date. The book has been updated, revamped, translated all
>> using the same tool, inviting new authors, adding case studies, etc. On
>> the first edition they used Lulu to print on demand, not sure which
>> service they are using now.
>>
>> Looking forward to read it, whatever shape/form it takes :)
>>
>> Sylvia
>>
>> From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at consensus.pro
>> <mailto:nashton at consensus.pro>>
>> Reply-To: Nick Ashton-Hart <nashton at consensus.pro
>> <mailto:nashton at consensus.pro>>
>> Date: Tuesday, 2 December 2014 4:38 am
>> To: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
>> Cc: "bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>"
>> <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [bestbits] [governance] From Confusion to Clarification
>>
>> +1 and me too on the updating.
>>
>> On 1 Dec 2014, at 11:41, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Might be one of those things that is more suited to a wiki or some
>>> other online work that can be updated as necessary.
>>>
>>> And if one does create one of those with the proper format, it can
>>> be gathered into an ebook or an printed object whenever wanted.
>>>
>>> I like the idea of a an online development that combines new
>>> writings with existing writings that is under constant update, and
>>> would be willing to contribute to that sort of ongoing dynamic
>>> effort if we aable to get one organized.
>>>
>>> avri
>>> On 01-Dec-14 10:54, Carlos Afonso wrote:
>>>> The only concern I have on yet another good proposal from Wolf is
>>>> that a book is static while the IG processes are in a complex,
>>>> difficult dynamic. I wonder if the book could be a "photograph"
>>>> of something which would be more or less regularly updated in a
>>>> corresponding collaborative portal?
>>>>
>>>> fraternal regards
>>>>
>>>> --c.a.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/1/14 10:25, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I propose that we start to work on what I call a “Civil Society
>>>>> Internet Governance Handbook”.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sala: Let's do this!
>>>>>
>>>>> This handbook would allow all CS groups within the CSCG to
>>>>> present
>>>>> their own individual points of views so that everybody knows
>>>>> what
>>>>> the positions are. The book could be structured into four
>>>>> main chapters:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Human Rights (Access, Freedom of Expression, Privacy
>>>>> etc.)
>>>>> 2. Security (Cyberwar, Cyberterrorism, Cybercrime etc.)
>>>>> 3. Economic Development (Market domination, competition,
>>>>> infrastructure development etc.)
>>>>> 4. Technical Coordination (Names, Numbers, Protocols etc.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Each of the six groups under the CSCG (IGC, BB, JNC, NCSG,
>>>>> Diplo,
>>>>> APC) could nominate four authors (one for each chapter).
>>>>> Each author
>>>>> would be free to argue for her/his position (five to maximum
>>>>> teen
>>>>> pages). There is no need for consensus. Every author would
>>>>> be free
>>>>> to present her/his radical, moderate, liberal and whatsoever
>>>>> position on one of the four main issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Such a compendium would help to bring more transparency into
>>>>> the
>>>>> process and would enable a more fact based discussion in the IG
>>>>> events ahead of us.
>>>>>
>>>>> We could deliver this as an e-book (probably with an Annex
>>>>> with main
>>>>> official texts as Tunis Agenda, Sao Paulo Principles, UN
>>>>> Resolutions
>>>>> etc.) until the May 2015 Sessions in Geneva. In total this book
>>>>> would be around 250 pages. If we find a sponsor we could
>>>>> publish
>>>>> this for the New York event in December 2015. Such a book
>>>>> would seen
>>>>> by the rest of the IG Community as a helpful contribution,
>>>>> it would
>>>>> strengthen the role of CS in the emerging IG multistakeholder
>>>>> mechanisms and would be also an input into the WSIS 10+
>>>>> process.
>>>>>
>>>>> The chair of the CSCG (together with the co-chairs from the six
>>>>> groups) would be the editor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any comment?
>>>>>
>>>>> Wolfgang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>> <mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>>>
>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Sylvia
>>
>> Join the conversation | https://blog.apnic.net/
>>
>> —————————————————————————
>>
>> Sylvia Cadena | Community Awards and Grants Specialist | sylvia at apnic.net
>> ISIF Asia Information Society Innovation Fund
>>
>> Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC)
>> 6 Cordelia Street, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101 Australia | PO Box 3646
>> Tel: +61 7 3858 3100 | Fax: +61 7 3858 3199
>> http://www.apnic.net | http://www.isif.asia
>>
>> sip: sylvia at voip.apnic.net
>> skype: sylviacadena
>> https://www.facebook.com/ISIF.asia
>> http://gplusme.at/ISIFAsia
>> Twitter @ISIF_Asia
>> ISIF blog http://discover.isif.asia
>>
>> * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary.
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
>> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>>
>
> --
> Gunela Astbrink
> GSA InfoComm
> PO Box 600
> Ballina NSW 2478
> Australia
> Mobile: +61 417 715738
> Email: g.astbrink at gsa.com.au
> www.gsa.com.au
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list