[bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement

[Andrew Puddephatt]

I think this is much too negative and fails to reflect the amount of positive agenda and genuinely good things that came out of the whole process.  I can’t support this statement

Andrew Puddephatt
Global Partners Digital
Andrew at gp-digital.org
Tel mobile +44 (0)771 339 9597
Tel office   +44 (0)207 549 0350


From: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au<mailto:Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au>>
Reply-To: Jeremy Malcolm <Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au<mailto:Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au>>
Date: Friday, 25 April 2014 01:44
To: "<bestbits at lists. net>" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net<mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>>
Subject: [bestbits] Civil society response to NETmundial 2014 outcome text open for endorsement

The following initial response to the NETmundial 2014 outcome text was agreed in the room at NETmundial by about 25 civil society representatives and was read out in the session by Niels ten Oever from Article 19.  If you are in agreement, please endorse and share:

http://bestbits.net/netmundial-response

This need not prevent the development of a more substantive civil society response later.

--
Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet lawyer, ICT policy advocate, geek
host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org<http://e164.org>|awk -F! '{print $3}'

WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to enable encryption at your end. For instructions, see http://jere.my/l/pgp.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140425/2c94a17f/attachment.htm>