[bestbits] Surveillance paragraph of netmundial document

[Katitza Rodriguez]

Hi Ian,

comments below:

On 04/17/2014 05:25 AM, Ian Peter wrote:
> no idea why Mawaki. Perhaps others know...
>  
> *From:* Mawaki Chango <mailto:kichango at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 17, 2014 7:17 PM
> *To:* Ian Peter <mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
> *Cc:* Anriette Esterhuysen <mailto:anriette at apc.org> ; Jeanette Hofmann
> <mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu> ; mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
> *Subject:* Re: [bestbits] Surveillance paragraph of netmundial document
>  
> Hi Ian,
>  
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com
> <mailto:ian.peter at ianpeter.com>> wrote:
> 
>     IN respect of this,  just reposting something Patrik Falstrom posted
>     in another place, suggesting that nations who have signed Human
>     Rights Treaty cannot sign in to necessary and proportionate? 
> 
>  
> Did he explain why, in short? Thanks. Mawaki

I would love to find the source that I can cite in my blogging. In any
case, we are not asking States to sign onto the Principles necessarily.
If they does it, that's a nice gesture. But I think you can still cited
the Principles in the NetMundial document.

As I explained, they are guiding principles for States, legislators,
judges on how to apply their existing international human rights
obligations in the context of communication surveillance. It would be
nice to get a reference in the netmundial document!


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140417/fe282e1a/attachment.sig>