[bestbits] Wrong analysis reduce the importance of Net Neutrality

[Carolina Rossini]

Terrible analysis ... And yes, the numbers should have been "normalized'
based on signatories

This was done based on
http://www.ip-watch.org/2014/03/20/quantitative-analysis-of-contributions-to-netmundial-meeting/

Which also do not take into consideration the signatories



On Wednesday, April 16, 2014, João Carlos R. Caribé <joao.caribe at me.com>
wrote:

> Dears,
>
> The Brazilian press issued one article where Net Neutrality appears as a
> topic of little interest, the number was obtained based on the number of
> proposals submitted. Like most proposals submitted by civil society were
> collective, the correct analysis would take into account the proposals
> submitted and the number of signatories. Agree?
>
> Read the text bellow using Google translator
>
>
> http://convergenciadigital.uol.com.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?infoid=36507&sid=4
>
>
> _
> João Carlos Caribé
> (021) 8761 1967
> (021) 4042 7727
> Skype joaocaribe
> Enviado via i



-- 
*Carolina Rossini*
*Project Director, Latin America Resource Center*
Open Technology Institute
*New America Foundation*
//
http://carolinarossini.net/
+ 1 6176979389
*carolina.rossini at gmail.com*
skype: carolrossini
@carolinarossini
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20140416/2e4f8d88/attachment.htm>