process Re: [bestbits] [Meeting Report]: friday meeting with fadi et all

[Carolina Rossini]

+1


On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Anja Kovacs <anja at internetdemocracy.in>wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have been in favour of keeping some discussions closed, at least in the
> early stages, for quite a while, and have been so for the reasons John and
> Kivuva point out: other stakeholder groups do so all the time, and a
> strategic argument to keep parts of a conversation limited to a smaller
> group does not mean that conversation cannot be reported back on to a
> larger group. As long as the latter happens, need more closed conversations
> really be a problem?
>
> As again confirmed during the Best Bits meeting, two specific
> characteristics of Best Bits as a network are that it is action-oriented
> and that it seeks to bridge the differences and disagreements between the
> Global South and North.
>
> To my mind, the strategy of being transparent at all times is one of the
> main reasons why action is often inhibited and civil society is often less
> effective than it could be. This is not only because we put all our cards
> on the table all the time - something which puts other stakeholders at an
> advantage. It is also because fully open lists do not encourage sharing
> certain kinds of information and ideas that could actually help to
> massively improve effectiveness of civil society action (and as is the case
> so often, perhaps Global South civil society is perhaps more vulnerable
> here than Global North civil society).
>
> In fact, if Best Bits has been working, it is because so much is actually
> done by small groups of people who want to do something, trust each other,
> start coordinating, and then bring their ideas, once crystallised, to the
> main list (what are now called "fluid working groups" in BB lingo ;)
>
> If we ignore this reality, this will only be at our own peril.
>
> I don't see transparency as an end in itself, but is a means to an end,
> which is the creation of a level playing field. Because of power
> differentials, different stakeholder groups are differently placed in this
> field, and whatever strategies we decide on should keep this in mind. The
> redistribution of power should drive our actions, not transparency as such.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Anja
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>



-- 
*Carolina Rossini*
*Project Director, Latin America Resource Center*
Open Technology Institute
*New America Foundation*
//
http://carolinarossini.net/
+ 1 6176979389
*carolina.rossini at gmail.com*
skype: carolrossini
@carolinarossini
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131031/c433b330/attachment.htm>