[bestbits] FW: BB/ Brazil summit input - expression of interest

[Joana Varon]

Dear Andrew,

Thanks for leading the organization of this.
You can add me on stream 2 and 3. And I'll probably be taking actions on
number one, as I'm here in Brazil and taking this as my working priority in
the meanwhile. :)

Specifically, about principles, you might be aware that the resolution
named The right to privacy in the digital age, proposed by Brazil and
Germany, is being voted *today *at the UNGA and will pass with consensus.
Text is here:
http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/C.3/68/L.45/Rev.1
Deborah is in the plenary and might have more details. Its a starting
point. Also, in partnership with EFF, Privacy International, Human Rights
Watch , etc we are launching a campaign for gathering more support for the
principles on necessary and proportionate and I see it as also a way to go
forward. Taking into account the experiences of the Swedish government to
implement them.

If you think our visions match, I'll be happy to join you.

best

joana




On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Andrew Puddephatt <Andrew at gp-digital.org>wrote:

> Following up on my e-mail re inputs to Brazil conference.
>
>
>
> To remind everyone: Although the details are not clear, it looks like
> there are three broad areas within which it would be useful for CS groups
> (and others)  to make pro-active submissions to the Brazil meeting. These
> are:
>
> AREA 1 - Recommendations on process issues for the conference (remote
> participation, stakeholder representation and selection)
>
> AREA 2 - Substantive input into their work to develop universal Internet
> principles (likely to cover the areas sketched out by President Rousseff in
> her speech to the UNGA).
>
> AREA 3 - Substantive input on an institutional framework for
> multistakeholder Internet governance including:
>
> 1.       Internationalisation of ICANN (based on existing work done by
> Internet Governance Project and/or others).
>
> 2.       Orphan issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC
> and the recommendations of the Correspondence Group).
>
> We have produced a chart mapping those who have expressed an interest in
> each of the areas below. There could feasibly be a number of different
> civil society submissions on each of these areas.
>
> Given the short timeframes, and the fact that there does not seem to be
> consensus among all of us on a number of these issues, I think the best way
> forward is for anyone who wants to lead on a particular submission to let
> the list know, gather together people who also want to work on that
> submission, develop something as a smaller group and then share it back
> with the platform. Obviously, ideally submissions would be able to gather
> broad agreement among BB participants, but consensus may be too high a bar
> at this stage.
>
> For my part, I am interested in two specific inputs:
>
> A submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed
> structure and multi-stakeholder participation (elements of which are likely
> to include ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)
>
> A submission on the first high level principle dealing with free
> expression, privacy etc.  Note that I’m concerned that privacy protections,
> if badly expressed, could restrict freedom of expression unduly so I’ll be
> looking to assert ICCPR standards on free expression.
>
> Not everyone will agree with that take on things and I assume there are
> many other issues to focus on so at this stage I’d like to know who would
> want to work with me on these two specific topics.
>
> I would encourage others to set out their own area of interest and seek
> collaborators.  As we will probably need to submit our views to Brazil
> and/or other organisers by March 1, 2014 I’d suggest we should aim to
> produce documents for endorsement/support by other groups on the BB
> platform by mid-February
>
>
>
>
>
> *Stream 1*
>
> *Stream 2*
>
> *Stream 3*
>
>
>
> *Recommendation on process issues for the conference (remote
> participation, stakeholder representation and selection)*
>
> *Substantive input on universal Internet principles (based on Marco Civil
> and/or other existing principles documents).*
>
> *Substantive input on an institutional framework for multistakeholder
> Internet governance including: 1. Internationalisation of ICANN (based on
> existing work done by Internet Governance Project and/or others). 2. Orphan
> issues (based on existing proposals put before the WGEC and the
> recommendations of the Correspondence Group).*
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> Submission on the first high level principle dealing with free expression,
> privacy etc. > asserting ICCPR standards on free expression.
>
> Submission on reforming internet governance that keep the dispersed
> structure and multi-stakeholder participation (which is likely to include
> ideas on internationalising ICANN and strengthening the IGF)
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> x
>
>
>
> Nnenna
>
> x
>
>
>
>
>
> Claudio
>
>
>
> x - contribute, not lead
>
>
>
> Valeria/ APC
>
>
>
> x - contribute
>
> x - contribute
>
> Marianne/ IRP
>
>
>
> x
>
>
>
> Jeanette
>
>
>
>
>
> x - listen and comment
>
> M. Gurstein
>
>
>
> x
>
> x
>
> Marilia/ Joana
>
>
>
>
>
> 3.1/3.2
>
> Pranesh
>
>
>
> x
>
> x
>
> Parminder
>
> x
>
> x
>
> x
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Andrew Puddephatt* | *GLOBAL PARTNERS* DIGITAL
>
> Executive Director
>
> Development House, 56–64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT
>
> T: +44 (0)20 7549 0336 | M: +44 (0)771 339 9597 | Skype: andrewpuddephatt
> *gp-digital.org <http://gp-digital.org>*
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>      http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>



-- 
-- 

Joana Varon Ferraz
@joana_varon
PGP 0x016B8E73
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131126/0d0e7528/attachment.htm>