[bestbits] Call for endorsements: Civil Society proposal to open participation in the CWG-Internet at ITU

Mon Jun 10 10:10:55 EDT 2013

Hi Ginger, the statement is at http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/. The link
you sent was to an older statement for WTPF.

Asociacioon Colombiana de usuarios de Internet is number 14 on the
signatory list.

Best,
Deborah

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:

> Antonio Medina has told me that he signed as the Asociacioon Colombiana de
> usuarios de Internet, and yesterday appeared on the list. He is concerned
> because the signature no longer appears at http://bestbits.net/wtpf-2013/
>
> Can you please check? Thanks. gp
>
> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
> IG Programmes, DiploFoundation
>
> *The latest from Diplo...* *Upcoming online courses in Internet
> governance: Master in Contemporary Diplomacy with Internet Governance
> specialisation, Critical Internet Resources and Infrastructure, ICT Policy
> and Strategic Planning, and Privacy and Personal Data Protection. Read
> more and apply at http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses*
>  **
> **
>
>
> On 10 June 2013 08:54, Deborah Brown <deborah at accessnow.org> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Parminder. I'm about to send the statement off to the ITU. Can
>> you endorse the statement on the Best Bits statement here?
>> http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/
>>
>> Can anyone else who would like to sign on and have their
>> organization/name included in the version sent to the ITU endorse it in the
>> next 15 minutes or so?
>>
>> Would be happy to continue the point you raised in a little less time
>> pressed environment.
>>
>> Best,
>> Deborah
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:42 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> IT for Change supports the statement....
>>>
>>> However, independent of the above statement, I am not able to understand
>>> the reason why so many of those who welcome the WTPF outcomes were against
>>> the Internet resolution 3 of WCIT... I see little difference between the
>>> two. Will be obliged if someone can explain. Why if these organisations are
>>> welcoming these opinions, which give ITU a role in key IG issues. and also
>>> especially opinion 6 that is so close to the 'Internet resolution' of the
>>> WCIT,  did they support the WCIT meltdown or split..
>>>
>>> parminder
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Monday 10 June 2013 07:55 AM, Joana Varon wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Tomorrow starts the ITU Council, to which we should address our
>>> statement for opening the participation at WCG-Internet.
>>> This is just a reminder, if you haven't considered to sign it on yet,
>>> please, do so:
>>>
>>>  http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/
>>>
>>>  (ps. Sorry for the insistence. But now we have two important
>>> statements in the pipeline to be delivered this week and we shall not let
>>> recent catastrophic - though not unimaginable - news undermine previous
>>> efforts on other inter-related topics.)
>>>
>>>  Kind regards
>>>
>>>  Joana
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Thanks, Jeremy.
>>>>
>>>> I'm adding in the website the names of the ones that have already
>>>> endorsed the statement, so they just have to confirm their email address
>>>> once they receive an email from the platform.
>>>>
>>>>  For the ones who haven't yet, please, consider to endorse:
>>>> http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/
>>>>
>>>>  best
>>>>
>>>>  joana
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>   On 07/06/2013, at 7:43 PM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  As the ITU Council will gather next week, the time frame is short, *we
>>>>> shall try to deliver the text next Monday, 10th.* Though leaving it
>>>>> open for endorsements at the platform.
>>>>>
>>>>>  So we suggest to already start the first round of endorsements
>>>>> through this list while we take the time to submit the text at the Best
>>>>> Bits platform for collecting more. Jeremy, are you fine with this? Can you
>>>>> help us to upload the text?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  It's now at http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/.  If you endorsed by
>>>>> email, please do so on the site too.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>>        --
>>>>>
>>>>> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
>>>>> Senior Policy Officer
>>>>> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
>>>>> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>>>>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
>>>>> Malaysia
>>>>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599 <%2B60%203%207726%201599>
>>>>>
>>>>> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map:
>>>>> https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013
>>>>>
>>>>> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org |
>>>>> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>>>>>
>>>>> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
>>>>> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Joana Varon Ferraz
>>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)
>>>> @joana_varon
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Joana Varon Ferraz
>>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)
>>> @joana_varon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Deborah Brown
>>  Policy Analyst
>> Access | AccessNow.org
>> E. deborah at accessnow.org
>> @deblebrown
>> PGP 0x5EB4727D
>>
>
>

-- 
Deborah Brown
Policy Analyst
Access | AccessNow.org
E. deborah at accessnow.org
@deblebrown
PGP 0x5EB4727D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130610/04e9fe8a/attachment.htm>