[IRPCoalition] [bestbits] [IP] DNI releases Fact Sheet on PRISM, but the damage is already done
Deborah Brown
deborah at accessnow.org
Mon Jun 10 10:05:47 EDT 2013
Cross regional statement by governments is happening now:
http://webtv.un.org/live-now/watch/23rd-regular-session-of-the-human-rights-council-27-may-14-june-2013/2178978643001/
Will send around the text when I locate it.
Deborah
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Jean Paul NKURUNZIZA <
nkurunziza1999 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> Great job done.
>
> Regards
>
>
> NKURUNZIZA Jean Paul
> TRAINER IN COMPUTING AND INTERNET POLICY
>
> ISOC BURUNDI : VICE PRESIDENT
> Réseau des Télécentres Communautaires du Burundi : Président
> www.rtcb.bi
>
>
> Burundi Youth Training Centre : Secrétaire Général
> www.bytc.bi
>
>
> Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/jeanpaul.nkurunziza
> Tel : +257 79 981459
> ------------------------------
> *De :* Viktor Szabados <vikszabados at gmail.com>
> *À :* Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com>
> *Cc :* "bestbits at lists.bestbits.net" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>; "
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org" <
> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org>
> *Envoyé le :* Lundi 10 juin 2013 12h51
> *Objet :* Re: [IRPCoalition] [bestbits] [IP] DNI releases Fact Sheet on
> PRISM, but the damage is already done
>
> Hello
>
> thanks for work.
>
> +1
>
> vik
>
> 2013/6/10, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com>:
> > + 1. Thanks, Joy!
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Rikke Frank Joergensen
> > <rfj at humanrights.dk
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Super proposal by Joy/ APC, I support it !****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> Rikke****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> *From:* irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org [mailto:
> >> irp-bounces at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org] *On Behalf Of
> >> *Marianne
> >> Franklin
> >> *Sent:* 10. juni 2013 11:41
> >> *To:* bestbits at lists.bestbits.net;
> >> irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> >> *Subject:* Re: [IRPCoalition] [bestbits] [IP] DNI releases Fact Sheet on
> >> PRISM, but the damage is already done****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >> MF****
> >>
> >> On 10/06/2013 10:37, parminder wrote:****
> >>
> >> I support this text by Joy...****
> >>
> >> On Monday 10 June 2013 02:56 PM, joy wrote:****
> >>
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Hi - sharing some ideas that came also from discussion with Frank La
> >> Rue's
> >> office and my suggested edits relate to the last para, the recommended
> >> action to the Council: - I think we have a 3 pronged approach to the
> call
> >> to action which is looking really good:
> >>
> >> "We call on the Human Rights Council to act swiftly to prevent creation
> >> of
> >> a global Internet based surveillance system by:
> >> 1) convening a special session to examine this case 2) supporting the
> >> recommendation of Mr La Rue that the Human Rights Committee develop of a
> >> new General Comment 16 on the right to privacy in light of technological
> >> advancements and 3) requesting the High Commissioner to prepare a report
> >> a)
> >> formally asking states to report on practices and laws in place on
> >> survellilance and what corrective steps will they willl take to meet
> >> human
> >> rights standards and b) examing the implications of this case in in the
> >> light of the Human Rights Council endorsed United Nations Guiding
> >> Principles on Business and Human Rights, the “Protect, Respect and
> >> Remedy”
> >> Framework of A/HRC/RES/17/4.
> >>
> >> Joy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/06/2013 8:47 p.m.,
> >> Joana Varon wrote:
> >> > Sure, Parminder. Lets****
> >>
> >> remove company names.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > And thanks for the comprehension.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:38 AM, parminder <
> >> parminder at itforchange.net****
> >>
> >> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>
> >> <parminder at itforchange.net>>*
> >> ***
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > Hi All
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > IT for Change will endorse this .... (There are some****
> >>
> >> changes I would have liked to propose but due to the
> >> urgency****
> >>
> >> of the issue i would not do it now. Certainly the names of
> >> the**
> >> **
> >>
> >> companies involved should have not been mentioned in the****
> >>
> >> statement. Can we still do it?.)
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > I am sure some of you may already be in contact with****
> >>
> >> him but if not Philippe Dam with Human Rights Watch may be
> >> a****
> >>
> >> useful person to talk to on this. i am cc-ing the email to****
> >>
> >> him. He is attending the HR Council meeting. Wonder if Joy
> >> is***
> >> *
> >>
> >> still there?
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > Best, parminder
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > On Monday 10 June 2013 10:07 AM, Deborah Brown wrote:
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Here's a quick update on the draft statement to****
> >>
> >> the Human Rights Council regarding the impact of state****
> >>
> >> surveillance on human rights. The draft statement is below.
> >> We**
> >> **
> >>
> >> are currently reaching out to Geneva based orgs who might
> >> be****
> >>
> >> able to assist with delivery (thanks Joy) and if not we can****
> >>
> >> still publish it and do outreach.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Given the short timeframe, can any further edits****
> >>
> >> be sent on this thread in the next 3.5 hours? Then I will
> >> post**
> >> **
> >>
> >> it to the Best Bits site to facilitate endorsement. In the****
> >>
> >> meantime, if organizations or individuals feel comfortable****
> >>
> >> endorsing this draft, please reply on this thread and we
> >> can****
> >>
> >> add your name through the Best Bits system later. As a****
> >>
> >> reminder, this statement would be part of a debate at the
> >> HRC***
> >> *
> >>
> >> that will take place at 15:00 Geneva time on Monday. Though****
> >>
> >> not ideal, this was the best time frame we could come up
> >> with***
> >> *
> >>
> >> for facilitating input and sign on.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Thanks to everyone who worked on this over the****
> >>
> >> last 12 hours and apologies for any shortcoming in the
> >> process**
> >> **
> >>
> >> because of time constraints. Looking forward to more input
> >> and**
> >> **
> >>
> >> to working together to get this finalized.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Best,
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Deborah
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Agenda item 8:/General Debate/
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Civil Society Statement to the Human Rights****
> >>
> >> Council on the impact of State Surveillance on Human Rights****
> >>
> >> addressing the PRISM/NSA case
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Thank you Mr. President. I speak on behalf of****
> >>
> >> ______ organizations from ___ countries, across ___
> >> regions.****
> >>
> >> This is a truly global issue. We express strong concern
> >> over****
> >>
> >> recent revelations of surveillance of internet and
> >> telephone****
> >>
> >> communications of US and non-US nationals by the government
> >> of**
> >> **
> >>
> >> the United States of America. Equally concerning is the****
> >>
> >> provision of access to the results of that surveillance to****
> >>
> >> other governments such as the United Kingdom, and the****
> >>
> >> indication of the possible complicity of some of the
> >> globally***
> >> *
> >>
> >> dominant US-based Internet companies whose services and
> >> reach***
> >> *
> >>
> >> are universally distributed. These revelations raise the****
> >>
> >> appearance of, and may even suggest a blatant and
> >> systematic****
> >>
> >> disregard for human rights as articulated in Articles 17
> >> and****
> >>
> >> 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
> >> Rights**
> >> **
> >>
> >> (ICCPR), as well as Articles 12 and 19 of the Universal****
> >>
> >> Declaration of Human Rights.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Just last year the Council unanimously adopted****
> >>
> >> Resolution 20/8, which "Affirms that the same rights that****
> >>
> >> people have offline must also be protected online, in****
> >>
> >> particular freedom of expression ..."[1] But during this****
> >>
> >> session the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression****
> >>
> >> reported (A/HRC/23/40) worrying new trends in state****
> >>
> >> surveillance of communications with serious implications
> >> for****
> >>
> >> the exercise of the human rights to privacy and to freedom
> >> of***
> >> *
> >>
> >> opinion and expression. The Special Rapporteur notes that****
> >>
> >> inadequate and non-existent legal frameworks "create a
> >> fertile**
> >> **
> >>
> >> ground for arbitrary and unlawful infringements of the
> >> right****
> >>
> >> to privacy in communications and, consequently, also
> >> threaten***
> >> *
> >>
> >> the protection of the right to freedom of opinion and****
> >>
> >> expression". [2]
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Affirmation of internet rights and freedoms by****
> >>
> >> governments in the cross regional statement on freedom of****
> >>
> >> expression and the Internet is important. But civil society
> >> is**
> >> **
> >>
> >> extremely concerned that governments supporting this
> >> statement**
> >> **
> >>
> >> are not addressing, and in fact are ignoring, the recent****
> >>
> >> serious revelations about mass surveillance in the
> >> PRISM/NSA****
> >>
> >> case. Although the personal information disclosed under
> >> this****
> >>
> >> programme is subject to the oversight of the US Foreign****
> >>
> >> Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), that court sits in****
> >>
> >> secret and has no responsiblity for ensuring the human
> >> rights***
> >> *
> >>
> >> of those not subject to US jurisdiction.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> The introduction of surveillance mechanisms into****
> >>
> >> the very heart of the data streams of the globally central****
> >>
> >> service providers storing and communicating the majority of****
> >>
> >> the world's digital communications is a backward step for****
> >>
> >> human rights in the digital age. As La Rue notes: "This****
> >>
> >> raises serious concern with regard to the extra-territorial****
> >>
> >> commission of human rights violations and the inability of****
> >>
> >> individuals to know that they might be subject to foreign****
> >>
> >> surveillance, challenge decisions with respect to foreign****
> >>
> >> surveillance, or seek remedies." An immediate response is****
> >>
> >> needed.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> We call on companies that are voluntary and****
> >>
> >> involuntary parties to the violation of the fundamental
> >> rights**
> >> **
> >>
> >> of their users globally to immediately suspend this
> >> practice.***
> >> *
> >>
> >> Such action would uphold the Human Rights Council endorsed****
> >>
> >> United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human****
> >>
> >> Rights, the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework of****
> >>
> >> A/HRC/RES/17/4.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> We call for protection of those who have made****
> >>
> >> these violations public. As Mr La Rue notes, laws "must not
> >> be**
> >> **
> >>
> >> used to target whistleblowers ... nor should they hamper
> >> the****
> >>
> >> legitimate oversight of government action by citizens." We****
> >>
> >> urge States protect those whistleblowers involved in this
> >> case**
> >> **
> >>
> >> and to support their efforts to combat violations of the****
> >>
> >> fundamental human rights of all global citizens.****
> >>
> >> Whistleblowers play a critical role in promoting
> >> transparency***
> >> *
> >>
> >> and upholding the human rights of all.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> This recent case is a new kind of human rights****
> >>
> >> violation specifically relevant to the Internet and one****
> >>
> >> foreshadowed in the Council's 2012 Expert Panel on Freedom
> >> of***
> >> *
> >>
> >> Expression and the Internet. We therefore call on the Human****
> >>
> >> Rights Council to act swiftly to prevent creation of a
> >> global***
> >> *
> >>
> >> Internet based surveillance system. One action the Council****
> >>
> >> could take would be to follow up the Expert Panel by
> >> convening**
> >> **
> >>
> >> a multistakeholder process to support the recommendation of****
> >>
> >> Mr. La Rue that the Human Rights Committee develop a new****
> >>
> >> General Comment on the right to privacy in light of****
> >>
> >> technological advancements
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> [1]
> >>
> http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G12/153/25/PDF/G1215325.pdf?OpenElement
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> [2]
> >>
> http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A.HRC.23.40_EN.pdf
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> ENDS
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Gene Kimmelman****
> >>
> >> <genekimmelman at gmail.com****
> >>
> >> <mailto:genekimmelman at gmail.com> <genekimmelman at gmail.com
> >>****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> I'm glad to see everyone diving in on this. ****
> >>
> >> I have only one overarching issue to raise concerning the****
> >>
> >> framing of whatever groups decide to put out: I believe it****
> >>
> >> would be most powerful to challenge both the US Gvt. and****
> >>
> >> companies to explain how what they have done does NOT****
> >>
> >> constitute human rights violations, with specific details
> >> to***
> >> *
> >>
> >> explain their stance. I believe all the language people
> >> are****
> >>
> >> suggesting can fit within this framing, and put the burden
> >> on***
> >> *
> >>
> >> others to show how our concerns are not justified. This
> >> has****
> >>
> >> more to do with long-term diplomatic impact that anything****
> >>
> >> else; the debate will continue and many of the facts will****
> >>
> >> probably never be made public -- but I think it is a
> >> strategic**
> >> **
> >>
> >> advantage for civil society to always be calling for****
> >>
> >> transparency and basing its conclusions on both what facts
> >> are**
> >> **
> >>
> >> presented, and what concerns are not addressed by the****
> >>
> >> presentation of convincing arguments/facts.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> On Jun 9, 2013, at 8:50 PM, Jeremy Malcolm****
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> On 10/06/2013, at 12:47 AM, Deborah Brown****
> >>
> >> <deborah at accessnow.org****
> >>
> >> <mailto:deborah at accessnow.org> <deborah at accessnow.org>>****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>> In any case, we could still work on a****
> >>
> >> statement to be released around this discussion, or later
> in****
> >>
> >> the HRC session, which ends this week. Jeremy, have you had****
> >>
> >> the chance to work on an outline? If not, I'm happy to help****
> >>
> >> start the drafting process. My main concern is whether we
> >> have**
> >> **
> >>
> >> enough time for significant participation from a diversity
> >> of***
> >> *
> >>
> >> groups so that this is coming from a global coalition.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Would it be OK if we copy it from the pad****
> >>
> >> to a sign-on statement on bestbits.net
> >> <http://bestbits.net/><http://bestbits.net/>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> 5 hours before the hearing? Those who are working on the
> >> pad***
> >> *
> >>
> >> can pre-endorse it there. If 5 hours ahead is not enough,****
> >>
> >> then I'll need to instruct someone else on how to do it****
> >>
> >> earlier, because I'll be in the air until then.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> --
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Senior Policy Officer
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Consumers International | the global****
> >>
> >> campaigning voice for consumers*
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle****
> >>
> >> East
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji****
> >>
> >> Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599****
> >>
> >> <tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599 <%2B60%203%207726%201599>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! |****
> >>
> >> Consumer Protection Map:
> https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main****
> >>
> >> | #wcrd2013
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org****
> >>
> >>
> >> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/><
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> | www.facebook.com/consumersinternational****
> >>
> >>
> >> <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational><
> http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> Read our email confidentiality notice
> >> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality><
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>
> >> .****
> >>
> >> Don't print this email unless necessary.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> --
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> You received this message because you are****
> >>
> >> subscribed to the Google Groups "Web We Want working group"****
> >>
> >> group.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop****
> >>
> >> receiving emails from it, send an email to
> >> webwewant+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com****
> >>
> >>
> >> <mailto:webwewant+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com><webwewant+
> unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>> For more options, visit
> >> https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> --
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Deborah Brown
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Policy Analyst
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> Access | AccessNow.org
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> E. deborah at accessnow.org****
> >>
> >> <mailto:deborah at accessnow.org> <deborah at accessnow.org>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> @deblebrown
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >> PGP 0x5EB4727D
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > --
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > --
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > Joana Varon Ferraz
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> > @joana_varon
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> >> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> >>
> >> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRtZurAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bq1coIAIVkFyZmO+KH/pRr0a4hXkhH
> >> /k4wojL3tG6WzRCY8/tP3v8NVY8L2QIG1PJoSUYw4afnrGWw2KZbEukhWpoZGm8k
> >> l/Bn/BWruU/4uPqGcPr8OME6oa9/CcSK/O0IQ04poiHwn0u81yzZ5BPooxKKmv7W
> >> bjecU0O8qwuE3YNWzNCvWJdNBAuEPg40A6Z7IjiY6w+zdLXAyaiV4XjkpWzXkNz0
> >> rk1kgY1LcG0c6QKdxFTAjDGRC+KUeirxRSpKEd+NdQO1dyrKH0XX82oc0J7y6ciR
> >> G2XLDxJULFIpHl0qBeuXPgy1883vB50RPtghRyQnRxl4rq41T9ED0UYtcOwF5Rs=
> >> =/bjR
> >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ****
> >>
> >> ** **
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ****
> >>
> >> -- ****
> >>
> >> Dr Marianne Franklin****
> >>
> >> Reader ****
> >>
> >> Convener: Global Media & Transnational Communications Program****
> >>
> >> Co-Chair Internet Rights & Principles Coalition (UN IGF)****
> >>
> >> Goldsmiths, University of London****
> >>
> >> Dept. of Media & Communications****
> >>
> >> New Cross, London SE14 6NW****
> >>
> >> Tel: +44 20 7919 7072****
> >>
> >> <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk> <m.i.franklin at gold.ac.uk>****
> >>
> >> @GloComm****
> >>
> >> https://twitter.com/GloComm****
> >>
> >> http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/franklin/****
> >>
> >>
> https://www.gold.ac.uk/pg/ma-global-media-transnational-communications/****
> >>
> >> www.internetrightsandprinciples.org****
> >>
> >> @netrights****
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRP mailing list
> >> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> >>
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > --
> >
> > Joana Varon Ferraz
> > Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV) <
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts/>
> > @joana_varon
> >
>
>
> --
> tag - Internetes Jogok és Alapelvek Koalíció Irányító Bizottsága
> http://internetrightsandprinciples.org
> tag - Új Média Fiatal Szakértői Csoport - Európai Ifjúsági Fórum
> elnök - Ifjúsági Strukturált Párbeszéd Nemzeti Munkacsoport
> www.facebook.com/szoljbele
> alapító, főszerkesztő - Elnökség Tudósítói www.elnoksegtudositoi.eu
> alapító - Elnökség Emberei www.elnoksegemberei.eu
> egykori magyar EU-elnökségi összekötő - Európai Ifjúsági Fórum
> www.youthforum.org
> --
> SZABADOS Viktor
> vikszabados at gmail.com
> +36 30 8535388
> Budapest, HU
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRP mailing list
> IRP at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org
> http://lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/irp
>
>
--
Deborah Brown
Policy Analyst
Access | AccessNow.org
E. deborah at accessnow.org
@deblebrown
PGP 0x5EB4727D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130610/319139e4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list