[bestbits] Call for endorsements: Civil Society proposal to open participation in the CWG-Internet at ITU

[parminder]

IT for Change supports the statement....

However, independent of the above statement, I am not able to understand 
the reason why so many of those who welcome the WTPF outcomes were 
against the Internet resolution 3 of WCIT... I see little difference 
between the two. Will be obliged if someone can explain. Why if these 
organisations are welcoming these opinions, which give ITU a role in key 
IG issues. and also especially opinion 6 that is so close to the 
'Internet resolution' of the WCIT,  did they support the WCIT meltdown 
or split..

parminder



On Monday 10 June 2013 07:55 AM, Joana Varon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Tomorrow starts the ITU Council, to which we should address our 
> statement for opening the participation at WCG-Internet.
> This is just a reminder, if you haven't considered to sign it on yet, 
> please, do so:
>
> http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/
>
> (ps. Sorry for the insistence. But now we have two important 
> statements in the pipeline to be delivered this week and we shall not 
> let recent catastrophic - though not unimaginable - news undermine 
> previous efforts on other inter-related topics.)
>
> Kind regards
>
> Joana
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com 
> <mailto:joana at varonferraz.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks, Jeremy.
>
>     I'm adding in the website the names of the ones that have already
>     endorsed the statement, so they just have to confirm their email
>     address once they receive an email from the platform.
>
>     For the ones who haven't yet, please, consider to endorse:
>     http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/
>
>     best
>
>     joana
>
>
>     On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org
>     <mailto:jeremy at ciroap.org>> wrote:
>
>         On 07/06/2013, at 7:43 PM, Joana Varon <joana at varonferraz.com
>         <mailto:joana at varonferraz.com>> wrote:
>
>>         As the ITU Council will gather next week, the time frame is
>>         short, *we shall try to deliver the text next Monday, 10th.*
>>         Though leaving it open for endorsements at the platform.
>>
>>         So we suggest to already start the first round of
>>         endorsements through this list while we take the time to
>>         submit the text at the Best Bits platform for collecting
>>         more. Jeremy, are you fine with this? Can you help us to
>>         upload the text?
>
>         It's now at http://bestbits.net/cwg-internet/.  If you
>         endorsed by email, please do so on the site too.
>
>         Thanks.
>
>         -- 
>
>         *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
>         Senior Policy Officer
>         Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for
>         consumers*
>         Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>         Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
>         Lumpur, Malaysia
>         Tel: +60 3 7726 1599 <tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599>
>
>         WCRD 2013 – Consumer Justice Now! | Consumer Protection Map:
>         https://wcrd2013.crowdmap.com/main | #wcrd2013
>
>         @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org
>         <http://www.consumersinternational.org/> |
>         www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>         <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>
>         Read our email confidentiality notice
>         <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
>         Don't print this email unless necessary.
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     -- 
>
>     Joana Varon Ferraz
>     Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)
>     @joana_varon
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>
> -- 
>
> Joana Varon Ferraz
> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS-FGV)
> @joana_varon

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130610/b7fc45fb/attachment.htm>