[bestbits] [governance] Multistakeholder Roles and Responsibilities

[Anriette Esterhuysen]

Thanks for the update Deborah. Looking forward to reports from the IEG 
if you and the others on the list who is following the meeting have time.
No time to make editsto the letter... crazy proposal writing deadlines :(

Anriette


On 06/02/2013 21:01, Deborah Brown wrote:
> Dear Anriette and all,
>
> I believe that the last thread on this chain was on 31 January, but it was
> a later email from Joana, which had the draft text for a letter that she
> and I had worked on for feedback from this group. I pasted that email below.
>
> The letter has not been finalized and is very much open for edits and
> comments. You can send comments either on this email chain or in the google
> doc (linked below). We only ask that if you make edits directly into the
> google doc that you insert a comment noting/explaining your changes (other
> than editorial ones) to make the process manageable.
>
> https://docs.google.com/a/accessnow.org/document/d/1qz4D839quE5vnY-XP-pgu3ENu3WArwIwm5_VgxukgaE/edit
>
> On a related note, I have joined the IEG and am participating remotely.
> There may be a consolidated draft text on the multistakeholder framework
> available tomorrow, which I can share with the list if it is of interest.
>
> I'm planning to attend the Paris meeting, as is my colleague Raegan
> MacDonald who is Brussels-based. If there is a date for a BestBits meeting
> around WSIS+10 could someone please send the information around?
>
> Best regards,
> Deborah
>
>
> Joana Varon via<http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=en&ctx=mail&answer=1311182>
>   lists.igcaucus.org
> Jan 31 (6 days ago)
> to governance, mshears, bestbits, jeremy
> Dear all,
>
> I think some people of the governance list felt off from this thread
> because people that replied were not in both lists, if so, please, refer to
> the exchange of mensages bellow.
>
> Basically, some of us are willing to draft to communications to ITU: 1)
> adaptation of the best bits statement (on the content of WTPF documents),
> 2) follow-up on the letter to the SG during WCIT (on process/barriers faced
> by civil society).
>
> With that in mind, Deborah Brown and I have drafted the following text for
> the item 2 (follow-up letter to SG). (Is it right that CDT is working on
> the first draft for number 1?)
>
> We hope that the draft bellow is useful and if you think so, could you
> please add comments until Monday?
>
> As Jeremy have mentioned, let us try to ask for special dispensation to
> contribute and try to submit both letters (or just this one) with CS
> signatures during next week meeting. Would those attending next week's IEG
> meeting (Matthew, Avri?) support this letter and agree to deliver it in
> Geneva?
>
> Hope it helps!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Joana

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
executive director, association for progressive communications
www.apc.org
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20130206/0d974182/attachment.htm>