[bestbits] Best Bits MAG nominations for your approval - URGENT

[genekimmelman at gmail.com]

To be more specific,  maybe those with lingering concerns need to decide whether they want to participate on the best bits platform or not. You decide.  If you think you can make it work better,  please offer ideas like Anriette, Michael and others have done. I believe we decided in Bali on an approach and I endorse Anriette's path toward formalizing this. And I suggest we wrap up this conversation for now and move on to substance.  Otherwise we delegitimze the broad support people worked towards over two days in Bali and make it more difficult to prepare for Brazil. 

-------- Original message --------
From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> 
Date: 12/02/2013  8:22 AM  (GMT-05:00) 
To: genekimmelman at gmail.com 
Cc: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>,Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>,bestbits at lists.bestbits.net 
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Best Bits MAG nominations for your approval - URGENT 
 
every response with such reluctance and  such kind of arguments raise more questions than giving answers or appeasing those with concerns.
as reminder BestBits initiative started in august 2012 when people were talking about WCIT and prepared first meeting IGF Baku, we will be in 2014 in few weeks and we are still with temporary settings.

Rafik

2013/12/2 genekimmelman at gmail.com <genekimmelman at gmail.com>
Internal accountability to a group with shared goals may differ from societal/global policy goals that the group will agree to if all others with power agree as well.  Best not to confuse these.  We should be accountable but not create internal processes that make it impossible to coordinate policy actions. 



-------- Original message --------
From: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> 
Date: 12/02/2013 3:52 AM (GMT-05:00) 
To: Parminder Singh <parminder at itforchange.net> 
Cc: "bestbits at lists.bestbits.net> Best Bits" <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net> 
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Best Bits MAG nominations for your approval - URGENT 


+1! 

On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:23 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

Civil society must always remain very vary of thinking of themselves as somehow so morally superior that they are exempt from normal accountability and transparency requirements



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131202/9cdc531f/attachment.htm>