[bestbits] Proposal on Best Bits governance
Shahzad Ahmad
shahzad at bytesforall.pk
Mon Dec 2 08:04:41 EST 2013
+1
as for all practical purposes the decisions have to be with consensus among
the group.
Keep up the great work everyone,
Best wishes and regards
Shahzad
From: "genekimmelman at gmail.com" <genekimmelman at gmail.com>
Reply-To: "genekimmelman at gmail.com" <genekimmelman at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, December 2, 2013 at 5:13 PM
To: <jeremy at ciroap.org>, <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Proposal on Best Bits governance
+1
-------- Original message --------
From: Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>
Date: 12/01/2013 10:43 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net
Subject: Re: [bestbits] Proposal on Best Bits governance
I for one can fully accept and endorse Anriette's helpful proposal. Others?
On 22/11/13 17:56, Anriette Esterhuysen wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> [Please note that this proposal is not about the Brazil meeting or civil
> society nomcoms.]
>
> In some of the recent threads people have called to question the
> legitimacy of the Best Bits steering committee, and of transparency and
> accountability in Best Bits. I agree it will be good to strengthen Best
> Bits internal processes, but we should do this in a way that does not
> undermine trust in people who have worked hard to bring Best Bits to
> where it is, or in one another. We should also not undermine our
> ability to work together at a time when civil society is having to rise
> to some pretty daunting challenges.
>
> In particular, we should try not to discourage those individuals who
> have been volunteering their time on Best Bits bits work - either on the
> SC, or on drafting inputs. Without their effort we would be in a far
> weaker position than we are now. We would not have had the benefit of
> two face-to-face meetings, or of several substantial letters/other
> inputs submitted in response to strategic opportunities for raising
> civil society voices.
>
> I would therefore like to propose the following:
>
> 1) We ask the current Best Bits Steering Committee, a group of people
> who started to volunteer their time in this capacity in July 2013, to
> continue to serve until 31 July 2014.
>
> 2) We ask them to present us with a short overview report of the work
> they did in 2013 by the end of this year.
>
> 3) We ask them to, by the end of the first quarter of 2014, to propose a
> process for the renewal of the Best Bits Steering Committee.
>
> Best
>
> Anriette
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Senior Policy Officer
Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers
Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement knowledge hub |
http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
@Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org
<http://www.consumersinternational.org> |
www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
<http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
Read our email confidentiality notice
<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality> . Don't print
this email unless necessary.
WARNING: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly recommended to
enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For instructions, see
http://jere.my/l/8m.
____________________________________________________________ You received
this message as a subscriber on the list: bestbits at lists.bestbits.net. To
unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131202/f30d4095/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bestbits
mailing list