[bestbits] Call for expressions of interest: 1net steering committee

parminder parminder at itforchange.net
Thu Dec 5 04:44:07 EST 2013


Nnenna

Thanks for this information..

My comments below.

On Thursday 05 December 2013 01:51 PM, Nnenna Nwakanma wrote:
> Hi people
>
> Been off mails on these lists for since the beginning of the week.
>
> I had some chat with some 1Net leads during the just ended AfriNIC 19 
> in Abidjan.
> Two clear things:
>
>  1. 1Net is still in its formative stage and is looking to the
>     community to shape its objectives, agenda and working methods
>  2. 1Net will strecth for some time, at least for now, that is the
>     leaning.
>  3. Brazil has a 6-month activity line between now and then. It may
>     end up as "intercession" between two IGFs
>

If 1Net proposes to be a larger IGF, I have  a problem with it.
>
>  1. Some other consultations of mine also show that stakeholders may
>     leverage on Brazil to " decide to do" as opposed to IGF which
>     comes to "discuss"
>

If it is trying to be an IGF plus, I have an even bigger problem...

All this is very unlike a tentative inter-stakeholder dialogue space 
oriented to a particular important event, or even an continuing one..

parminder

>  1. Being that 1Net is "here to stay"" and Brazil is a one-off (until
>     initial participants decide otherwise) then it should be okay for
>     people to be in Brazil Steering and also 1Net Steering
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Nnenn
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:14 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net 
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>
>     On Wednesday 04 December 2013 07:25 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     I'm sure you're aware by now of the 1net dialogue, which the
>>     technical community organisations initiated around the time of
>>     the Bali IGF meeting, and invited the private sector and civil
>>     society to join.  The vision for the 1net dialogue is rather
>>     poorly defined, so it remains unclear how important or
>>     influential 1net may become.  I'm not going to attempt to
>>     summarise the competing visions for 1net here.  I can only
>>     suggest that if you haven't already, you read the email archives
>>     of its mailing list to learn more:
>>     https://nro.net/mailman/listinfo/i-coordination.
>>
>>     There has been a somewhat loose invitation from the 1net
>>     coordinators for the other stakeholder groups to each nominate
>>     five members for the 1net steering committee, but a deadline for
>>     that has only just been set, and (unless extended) it is very
>>     soon - *next Monday 9 December*.  So to do this, we are falling
>>     back to the same joint committee of representatives from civil
>>     society networks that recently nominated civil society members to
>>     join the High Level Panel convened by ICANN to provide input into
>>     the Brazil meeting.
>>
>>     Each of those networks is now urgently reaching out to their
>>     constituents, as I'm doing so now, to ask for expressions of
>>     interest in serving on the 1net steering committee.  On the part
>>     of the Best Bits participants, in Bali we already nominated the
>>     same four Brazilian representatives (Carolina, Joana, Carlos and
>>     Laura) to be on that committee.  As far as I know, they are
>>     willing to continue, but have expressed the wish that someone
>>     else also join, who has a closer association with the ICANN
>>     community.  That being the case, we need to put forward one name.
>
>     Is this a view communicated by all the 4 reps... I am not so sure
>     of the justification. Why not for instance have someone from the
>     ICTD community... I think Carlos have deep connections enough with
>     the ICANN community, no... We need to take the Brazil summit
>     outwards towards key global Internet related public policy issues
>     that are real concerns for the world, and not more inwards towards
>     narrow ICANN issues, which are a very limited set. But I agree
>     that the four existing reps being all from Brazil, a developing
>     country, maybe the additional person can be from a developed
>     country.  Crossing these two considerations, I think Michael
>     Gurstein should make a great choice.
>
>     parminder
>
>
>
>>
>>     If you would like to be put yourself forward to join the 1net
>>     steering committee, or would like to nominate someone else, then
>>     this thread is for that purpose.  The thread can also be used to
>>     discuss the criteria that you think should be used by the joint
>>     committee in considering the nominees to put forward.  If you
>>     disagree that the four Brazilian representatives should be
>>     amongst the five civil society representatives on the 1net
>>     steering committee, then you can put forward that view too.
>>
>>     In closing, I do need to acknowledge that the joint committee is
>>     still an imperfect vehicle for nominating civil society
>>     representatives to the 1net steering committee, because it
>>     doesn't yet have an elaborate procedure in place for making the
>>     selection - and I know how sensitive some of us are about that
>>     sort of thing.  All I can say about that is that in parallel to
>>     this call for expressions of interest, the committee is also
>>     considering how procedures it could put in place that would
>>     satisfy their constituents' expectations for a transparent and
>>     accountable process.  Meanwhile, that remains a work in progress.
>>
>>     I will forward the views put forward in this thread to the other
>>     members of the joint committee (who are currently from APC,
>>     Diplo, the IGC and the NCSG - Michael Gurstein's interest in
>>     joining has also been noted and is under discussion).  We will
>>     then discuss the nominations within the committee, and attempt to
>>     come back to you all with a suggestion that will hopefully be
>>     generally acceptable.  If you have any process-related queries,
>>     it is probably appropriate that you direct those to Ian Peter who
>>     is the independent chair of the joint committee for now.
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
>>     Senior Policy Officer
>>     Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
>>     Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
>>     Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala
>>     Lumpur, Malaysia
>>     Tel: +60 3 7726 1599 <tel:%2B60%203%207726%201599>
>>
>>     Explore our new Resource Zone - the global consumer movement
>>     knowledge hub
>>     |http://www.consumersinternational.org/news-and-media/resource-zone
>>
>>     @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org
>>     <http://www.consumersinternational.org/> |
>>     www.facebook.com/consumersinternational
>>     <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>>
>>     Read our email confidentiality notice
>>     <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>.
>>     Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>
>>     *WARNING*: This email has not been encrypted. You are strongly
>>     recommended to enable PGP or S/MIME encryption at your end. For
>>     instructions, see http://jere.my/l/8m.
>>
>
>
>     ____________________________________________________________
>     You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     bestbits at lists.bestbits.net <mailto:bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>.
>     To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
>     http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20131205/66178766/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bestbits mailing list