Best Bits: Agenda Organization Options

[parminder]

On Monday 10 September 2012 03:27 PM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 09/09/2012, at 10:22 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net 
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>> snip
>
> As I understand, Wolfgang proposes that we could use the language that 
> he and some others of you were already involved with drafting at the 
> Council of Europe as a starting point (scroll down):
>
> https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1835773
>

The question I asked was; whats wrong with the 10 Internet rights and 
principles developed by the civil society dominated IRP group over many 
iterations over 2 years, or its more elaborate full charter. Why not use 
that? Why instead privilege a document from an inter-gov process that 
too one which has only a few governments involved? (especially when the 
involved people seem quite against any inter-gov process that includes 
all govs developing such principles :) )

parminder


> -- 
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer
> Consumers International | the global campaigning voice for consumers*
> Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, 
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> *Your rights, our mission – download CI's Strategy 2015:* 
> http://consint.info/RightsMission
>
> @Consumers_Int | www.consumersinternational.org 
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/> | 
> www.facebook.com/consumersinternational 
> <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice 
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't 
> print this email unless necessary.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/bestbits/attachments/20120910/e2dea6c4/attachment.htm>