Internet governance principles thread

[Anriette Esterhuysen]

Dear Jeremy

I had a look at the survey.. and.. well.. I did not really find the
differences between the options that clear...and I also could not quite
relate them back to the discussion thread on the list. But I have been
busy and have not been able to follow the thread as carefully as I would
have liked to.

Best

Anriette


On 28/10/2012 03:45, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 22/10/2012, at 3:02 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/10/12 18:44, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
>>> This is a counterpart to the previous thread, for ideas about what should go into the Internet governance principles statement for the IGF that we develop at Best Bits.  Whilst we will be working on this face-to-face, it is sensible not to cram our work into one session when preparatory work can be done online.
>>
>> In previous discussions here, nobody has disagreed that we should begin from an existing document in developing our statement of     Internet governance principles.  However differences of opinion have been expressed over what would be the most suitable document to use.
>>
>> Here is a survey which I would encourage you to take, which I presents four of the most obvious choices, and asks you to rank them according to your preference:
>>
>> http://www.igcaucus.org/limesurvey/index.php?sid=78947&lang=en
>>
>> Please take a few minutes to take the above survey, and I'll present the options back here in one week.
> 
> 
> We still only have 5 responses to this... so if you haven't responded, please follow the link above and provide your preferred ranking for the Internet principles statements that we could use as a basis for our work next week.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
executive director, association for progressive communications
www.apc.org
po box 29755, melville 2109
south africa
tel/fax +27 11 726 1692