<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23/03/21 4:50 am, suresh wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:FD657A87-4F0B-6447-AAA8-6458E3114920@hxcore.ol">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>
<div>What I am missing here is that so far the oecd has
defined norms and best practices and collected / released
data rather than having gone anywhere near actual
governance <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I have employed considerable text below, and in the earlier
email, that can leave no doubt about the functions of OECD's CDEP.
In the previous email, I provided a link to the page on OECD
website about the 'legal instruments' (its own language) that it
develops through these committees. In this second email below I
enclosed terms of reference for an informal drafting group with a
clearly mentioned purpose of developing a new legal instrument.</p>
<p>Despite all this, if you write what you have, I do not know what
to make of it. I hold myself back because I do not want to feed
the likely purpose of making it impossible to have any rational
discussion on the subject in this space.<br>
</p>
<p>In any case, I have also said, and a few times, whatever you
think is the function OCED's CDEP undertakes, what about doing an
exact cut paste for a UN committee on digital policy. Such models
have been advocaed by developing countries on several occasions in
the last 12-13 years. But not just the North and OECD countries,
but all IG civil society members here have fully refused to
consider them.... That is why I call this approach as colonial.
And just because some developing country people too join them in
refusing what they themselves do at the OECD does not make it less
colonial. Colonialism always had such internal collaborators. <br>
</p>
<p>parminder <br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:FD657A87-4F0B-6447-AAA8-6458E3114920@hxcore.ol">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Do you see any kind of change occurring in
this?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div style="direction: ltr">--srs</div>
</div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri,
sans-serif"><b>From:</b> Governance
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:governance-bounces@lists.igcaucus.org"><governance-bounces@lists.igcaucus.org></a> on behalf of
parminder via Governance
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"><governance@lists.igcaucus.org></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:34 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Governance] 170 orgs send an open
letter to UN SG to stop plans for a new High Level
Multistakeholder Body
<div> </div>
</font></div>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<p><br>
</p>
<p>In my response to Milton I did not discuss the fully
multilateral and intergovernmental nature of digital policy
making by the below mentioned OCED's Committee on Digital
Economy Policy (CDEP), This is because, for the sake of this
particular argument, Milton was neutral about such a body
being inter-gov or multistakeholder... He simply did not see
the need for such an apex, cross-sectoral, body.</p>
<p>But for those who helped shape and support the proposed new
Multistakeholder High Level Body, which will evidently take
a central and apex digital policy role in the UN system, I
have a further and different question. <br>
</p>
<p>When they find ok and acceptable the completely
inter-governmental process of digital norms, principles and
policy making at the OECD (which actually becomes the
default for the world), and indeed participate
enthusiastically in its processes even if only as consulting
entities, why -- and on what basis -- do they oppose at the
global / UN level shaping of norms, principles and policy
done in a similar inter-gov manner, which could have similar
consultative processes as the OECD? Is this not a colonial
approach? How can they do such a thing, in this age and
time? And worse, how do even developing country entities and
actors join in such a hypocrisy of the North? <br>
</p>
<p>None of these questions are rhetorical.. So please do
answer them, even if to explain how anything here may be
wrongly stated, framed, etc...</p>
<p>Any actual work on norms, principles and policies
development in OECD's Committees, including the CDEP for
digital policy, is undertaken only among governments,
although there exist civil society, business and trade union
advisory groups that can give comments. But that happens in
most UN processes as well. Remember WSIS? We had such an
exemplary inclusive process with huge multi-stakeholder
rights of participation, more than provided in the CDEP. <br>
</p>
<p>To concretely illustrate CDEP's inter-governmentalism; see
enclosed the ToR for an 'informal drafting group on
government access to data held by private sector'. It is to
only have governmental members. So indeed, not only do other
stakeholders not participate in final decision making, they
are not to be part of even an informal drafting group! I
have seen much better drafting processes at national levels;
in India, for instance for its draft data protection bill.<br>
</p>
<p>And you know what, this beats it all -- the OECD passes
this as their multistakholder processes for digital policy
development. See, for instance, Box 1.1 of this document <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/C-MIN-2018-6-EN.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/C-MIN-2018-6-EN.pdf</a></p>
<p>One wonders then, why the multistakeholder model for OECD's
digital policy making is different, and that for the rest or
whole of world is different, which is centred on this
proposed Multistakeholder High Level Body. I am indeed
happy to adopt the exact OECD multistakeholder model for
digital policy making in the UN as well. Actually India
proposed a UN committee for digital policies in 2011 to the
UN GA with similar role and similar 'multistakeholder'
processes as OECD's CDEP. It was rejected out of hand as an
attempt to foist multilateralism and governmental control
over the Internet. Such unabashed hypocrisy! <br>
</p>
<p>Why when OECD makes its digital policies in a certain
democratic manner, at the global level corporations are to
sit at an equal level with governments for policy
development, as would happen with this proposed
Multistakeholder High Level Body. . If they find this model
so good, why do they not adopt it for OECD's digital policy
making. Why those civil society groups that are pushing the
MS High Level Body model at the UN level not also push it
for the OECD ?<br>
</p>
<p>The proposed Multi stakeholder High Level Body for digital
policies, therefore, represents not just a corporate capture
of policy making, but it is also a body for digital
colonialism. Even as the promoters of this initiative from
the North, including governments, themselves make digital
policies in a democratic inter-gov manner, including at
inter-country level, for the developing world they want the
process to be controlled by their tech majors, which, unlike
the Northern governments themselves, have vast presence in
developing countries too. If this is not digital
colonialism, what would be!<br>
</p>
<p>But I might be missing or misrepresenting something, and
would be happy to be corrected.</p>
<p>parminder <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/03/21 5:20 pm, parminder
via Governance wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1559bbe8-369e-e603-066d-128368f15b3e@itforchange.net">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<p><tt>Second: But if in any case you still remain
absolutely opposed to a cross-sectoral, apex, digital
policy and governance body, and I have been raising this
same issue for at least 12-13 years now, why you never
oppose the OECD's Committee on Digital Economy Policy
(CDEP)? </tt><tt>In the name of the body, </tt><tt>'Economy'
is there only for forms sake. This committee shapes
digital policy in all areas, from principles for tech
architecture, to platforms and content, to data and AI.
Why do OECD needs a transnational, single digital
governance body, when you so strongly oppose such a body
at the global level. I have raised this issue often, and
at one time when you could not avoid responding, you
dismissed this body as a capacity building body, which
is of course an untruth. OECD committees do go as far as
developing <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0347">legal
instruments</a>. <br>
</tt></p>
<p><tt>The latest initiative of the CDEP is on <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/trusted-government-access-personal-data-private-sector.htm">government
access to data held by the private sector</a>. The
likely outcomes could be a document of policy principles
but it could even be a legal instrument. Since digital
policy making is a cross-sectoral work, CDEP often works
in collaboration with other OECD Committees towards
different ends. For instance, it worked with the
Committee on Health to develop <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://one.oecd.org/document/COM/DELSA/DSTI(2016)1/en/pdf">Health
Data Principles</a>. A very appropriate kind of
output, and done in the right way too. Similarly a UN
body on digital governance -- while all countries and
not just the richest ones are represented -- should
work with the WHO to develop global Health Data
Principles. In default of an UN Internet/ digital
governance body, OECD's norms, principles and policies
become the default global one. </tt><br>
</p>
<p><tt>But here you develop cold feet... OECD committees
should keep functioning and rolling out global
governance norms, principles and policies, but not any
UN body. That is not needed, any such thing is
completely relevant. This is plainly a colonial
attitude. It is a pity that in the global Internet/
digital governance space one can openly do such a thing.
It normally does not happen elsewhere, in global civil
society spaces. </tt><br>
</p>
<p><tt>You are from the US, why dont you advocate to the
OECD, where your gov sits, to cede its one-point
cross-sectoral digital norms/ policy work, and abolish
the body specifically made for this purpose? What right
do you have to tell the rest of the world to not do it?
I repeat, it is plain and simple colonialism. </tt><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN7PR07MB4689B638CAF83BCFECA191D7A1669@BN7PR07MB4689.namprd07.prod.outlook.com">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
125);"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<br>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11pt;
font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73,
125);"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1
1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">
Governance <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:governance-bounces@lists.igcaucus.org"
moz-do-not-send="true"><governance-bounces@lists.igcaucus.org></a>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>parminder via Governance<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, March 13, 2021 12:30 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Governance] 170 orgs send an
open letter to UN SG to stop plans for a new
High Level Multistakeholder Body<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p>The open letter was sent to the official consultation
process, signed by more than 170 organisations.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>It was titled "“More than 170 Civil Society Groups
Worldwide Oppose Plans for a Big Tech Dominated Body
for Global Digital Governance” .<o:p></o:p></p>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Please see the final statement and endorsements at</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><a href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatech.edu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923889975%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=LINRHD5T4MZBhJN75Fvb%2BJ04O4zUY1ErnSUWmDtofb8%3D&reserved=0" moz-do-not-send="true">https://justnetcoalition.org/big-tech-governing-big-tech.pdf</a> .</span> <o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">It was also translated into Spanish, French, German and Dutch. All versions are linked from the enclosed document <o:p></o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">We had just 3 days to get sign ons, out of which 2 were weekend days. In the circumstances, the number is quite good. It shows the groundswell to opposition to this move. Thanks to everyone who supported this.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">We will now get this letter also sent directly to the UN SG and his new Tech Envoy.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">We will like to keep this campaign open for some time to get additional support and build awareness ...</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">This ongoing campaign is just a start, much more needs to be done and will be done to stop this assault on democracy and on possibilities of effective regulation of Big Tech. We will be doing all it takes, including engaging with governments.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">We will follow a twin track: develop a powerful movement within civil society groups, and engage with governments and the UN.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Will keep you posted.</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><o:p> </o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Best regards</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">parminder</span><o:p></o:p></pre>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 05/03/21 2:15 pm, parminder
via Governance wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Dear All</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">This is an<a
href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatech.edu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923899975%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=8fVH%2BEPgBnX09zXtQUFKFKI3BwIWjbxbqDqb3cSbIzI%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true"> open letter to the
UN Secretary General</a> initiated by 16
global and national level civil society
networks and organisations urging him to
shelve plans for a High Level
Multistakeholder Body which, if set up, can
be expected to become the default apex
global digital governance and policy body.
This body is proposed to have a private
funding model, with strong hints also at a
'pay to play' model. It is but obvious that
Big Tech will come to dominate any such
body. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Quoting from the
letter:</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote
style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><i><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Not only in
developing countries but also in the US
and EU, calls for stronger regulation of
Big Tech are rising. At the precise
point when we should be shaping global
norms to regulate Big Tech, plans have
emerged for an ‘empowered’ global
digital governance body that will
evidently be dominated by Big Tech.
Adding vastly to its already overweening
power, this new Body would help Big Tech
resist effective regulation, globally
and at national levels. Indeed, we face
the unbelievable prospect of ‘<b>a Big
Tech led body for Global Governance of
Big Tech’</b>.</span></i><o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif"> Two technical
annexes to the open letter explain the
background of the matter in considerable
detail. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">This letter is
open for endorsements, </span></b><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">which can be done by
writing an email to </span><u><span
style="color: navy;"><a
href="mailto:secretariat@justnetcoalition.org"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif" lang="EN-GB">secretariat@justnetcoalition.org</span></a></span></u><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif"> or filling </span><u><span
style="color: navy;"><a
href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlookcom/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech-form&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatech.edu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923899975%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=NcSzxaUwS1s%2BHKfhkXlpStaqFwNiOKO283dmauSu7eA%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif" lang="EN-GB">this
form</span></a></span></u><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif"> before midnight PST
(GMT-8) of the 7<sup>th </sup></span><span
style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">of March.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Please also do
circulate to other groups and networks where
it may attract interest. </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">The open letter may
also be accessed at <a
href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatech.edu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923909974%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=sSgqsid1nkclqh%2Bg4AgHrX0Mx1%2BdqWbsa%2FKWavGwp50%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://justnetcoalition.org/big-tech-governing-big-tech.pdf</a></span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">French text is at <a
href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech-french.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatech.edu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923909974%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=JOSC%2FHFG4omaj9tdxgm5%2FJ%2FF7Ft5jg0gNv%2FCL%2BiG970%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true"> :
https://justnetcoalition.org/big-tech-governing-big-tech-french.pdf</a>
and Spanish version at - <a
href="https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjustnetcoalition.org%2Fbig-tech-governing-big-tech-spanish.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cmilton%40gatechedu%7Cb4c8944001194bc7858208d8e5e11d64%7C482198bbae7b4b258b7a6d7f32faa083%7C0%7C0%7C637512102923919962%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=fADhoRYAeqkzZwCekvnWnl7hdc06MwbqMDnIaik%2BxWM%3D&reserved=0"
moz-do-not-send="true">
https://justnetcoalition.org/big-tech-governing-big-tech-spanish.pdf</a>
</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Please let us know
if you have any questions or comments
regarding the above.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="western"
style="mso-margin-top-alt:5.75pt;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:5.75pt;margin-left:0in;line-height:115%"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-family:"Calibri
Light",sans-serif">Best, parminder </span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BN7PR07MB4689B638CAF83BCFECA191D7A1669@BN7PR07MB4689.namprd07.prod.outlook.com">
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>