<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">Milton is right on all points. I’ve been very short of time, but he’s clearly articulated approximately the same set of objections that occurred to me. Complaining about transparency comes across as “I’m offended that I wasn’t in the room” rather than “this is a bad outcome.”<br><br>The letter needs to concern itself clearly and exclusively with our desired outcome. Else that, which is the most important point, will get lost in the noise. <br><div dir="ltr"> <div> -Bill</div><div><br></div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Dec 19, 2019, at 20:23, Mueller, Milton L <milton@gatech.edu> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">Sheetal:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">This is not a very well-informed letter, sorry to say. See comments in line below:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>Subject: Letter from the Internet Governance Caucus re: the sale of .org</b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Principally, we are concerned that the sale of PIR to a private entity investment firm would significantly alter the Domain Name System and weaken ISOC.
<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: Odd. How would $1.135 billion weaken ISOC? How would the transfer of control of one medium-size TLD registry significantly alter
the DNS? The letter loses credibility right off the bat by making claims that cannot be backed up.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">PIR played an important role, as the only remaining non-commercial top-level domain registry operator, in serving as a counterbalance against commercial exploitation.
<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: Really? Aside from its annual support for NCUC (which was a fulfillment of the obligation in the original RFP), there was no
meaningful difference between the way PIR was run and most other gTLD registries was run, both in terms of pricing and service. This observation both unfairly casts aspersions on all commercial registries while falsely idealizing PIR.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">PIR ran .ORG, .NGO, and .ONG for the benefit of its users, whereas other top-level domains are run by private companies with purely financial objectives.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: Again, can you cite specific differences in behavior? And do you believe that if ISOC/PIR are forced to continue running ORG
even if they don’t want to that things will be better?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">PIR, as a subsidiary of ISOC, could be relied upon to do what was best for domain name registrants, and has a proud history of doing just that.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: Yeah, that’s why it advocated for an end to price caps, added URS, and toyed with intellectual property takedown procedures.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">However, PIR also gave ISOC greater legitimacy and wider influence. It allowed ISOC to take an even more active role in shaping Internet infrastructure. In relinquishing its control over PIR, ISOC would lose
some of its ability to directly impact how millions of people around the world positively experience the Internet every day, and we think that is a great pity.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: This is a pretty absurd claim, it amounts to the IGC thinking that it knows what is good for ISOC better than ISOC’s trustees
and staff do. This also shows a lack of knowledge. Running one TLD registry out of 2000 with less than 5% share of world registrations does not really do much to “shape internet infrastructure.” Supporting IETF shapes internet infrastructure, running ORG does
not. It also ignores ISOC’s somewhat valid concern that tying their finances to a particular line of business distorts their objectivity regarding the future of the internet.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">We ask that ISOC commit to publishing on its website all correspondence and documents exchanged with ICANN in relation to the proposed change in control of PIR. In addition, we ask that ISOC commit to publishing
on its website any filings (including motions and petitions) in the Pennsylvania Orphans' Court relating to the change in status of the PIR.<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: This focus on the machinations around the sale totally misses the target. We want
<b>forward-looking</b> information and commitments: we want Ethos to tell us how they will fulfill the obligations in the 2002 RFP and we want them to make new commitments, embedded in the Registry Agreement, that will protect ORG registrants.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">We expect an organization that operates in the public interest, and who promotes the values of openness, trust, and transparency, to be coherent with those values when making major decisions.
<span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D">MM: Again I cannot understand this morbid fascination with ISOC’s decision making process and the absence of a forward-looking agenda.
Demand something meaningful, please! Wish IGC had paid more attention to advice from those of us actually active within the DNS policy environment.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span>---</span><br><span>To unsubscribe: <mailto:igc-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net></span><br><span>List help: <https://riseup.net/lists></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>