<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 19 Dec 2018, at 7:11 am, <a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com" class="">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a> wrote:</div><div class=""><div style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: "Segoe UI"; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class=""><div id="x05dbd5afbb4f46a0a7002f6bc4325b38" class=""><p class="western" style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">Then there is what to do with CSCG. If, as I suggest, BB, JNC and IGC end up as one group again, What is the future of CSCG? Only APC remains as an active organisation at this stage. I think here thought needs to be given to outreach as well – if for instance there was an agreement that privacy and human rights were our two biggest issues, why not invite prominent civil society organisations in those areas to join in?</p></div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>You forgot NCSG, which continues to be very active and busy (and focussed on privacy and human rights), just, as always, focussed on ICANN issues.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>David</div><br class=""></body></html>