<p dir="ltr"><br>
On 11 Jul 2016 12:48 am, "Ian Peter" <<a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hmm – I can’t see the need for a coordinator to stand down if they are also a CSCG rep- I think doing both is OK and probably not too much of a load.<br>
> <br>
CPU: Really? If so, we'll have them (or any of the two) take up the rep tasks if they're INTERESTED.<br>
Many thanks.<br>
> <br>
> From: Chris Prince Udochukwu Njoku<br>
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:10 AM<br>
> To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a> ; Ian Peter<br>
> Cc: Arsene TUNGALI (Yahoo) ; Remmy Nweke<br>
> Subject: Re: [governance] Update on CSCG Working Group<br>
> <br>
><br>
> I'm on Ian's side. If the 2-rep proposal is adopted, it's either the IGC coordinators will move to the positions of CSCG reps and a new pair of coordinators will be selected or they will call for EOI for selection of reps in CSCG. In the case of the second, a coordinator who's interested in being a rep in CSCG is free to express interest; and if s/he's selected, a new coordinator will be selected. So I think.<br>
><br>
> CPU<br>
><br>
> _________________________________________<br>
> Sent from Sony X11<br>
><br>
> On 10 Jul 2016 10:20 pm, "Ian Peter" <<a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Hi Arsene,<br>
>> <br>
>> Having the two coordinators as CSCG members would be the easiest way forward – is there a particular reason you don’t favour that idea?<br>
>> <br>
>> Otherwise – I don’t see a problem with the coordinators calling for expressions of interest from IGC membership and then determining the best representative (this could be either a nomcom or a decision of the coordinators)<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> Ian<br>
>> <br>
>> <br>
>> From: Arsene TUNGALI (Yahoo)<br>
>> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 5:59 PM<br>
>> To: <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a> ; Ian Peter ; Remmy Nweke<br>
>> Subject: Re: [governance] Update on CSCG Working Group<br>
>> <br>
>> @Remmy, I would love to hear your thoughts (as an IGC member) as it will help move the debate forward. <br>
>> <br>
>> I am interested in hearing from our group members on the following...<br>
>> <br>
>> Currently (and I think for the past few years), we (as ICG) have been having only one rep in the CSCG and it used to be one of the co-cos, each one serving one year and leaving the following year to the other co-co. This means, after Analia, I am the one representing us on the CSCG until the next one is elected. We can still discuss this way of doing if someone is not happy :)<br>
>> <br>
>> But my question is this: Now that these suggested changes withing the CSCG suggest we have two reps from each coalition member, I would love to hear your thoughs on how we, as IGC we will be dealing with nominating our representatives. My take is that we should not have both co-cos there but maybe have one co-co and have another member (to be chosen, process to be agreed on).<br>
>> <br>
>> I suggest we start thinking on this so that when the final work of the WG will be presented and agreed upon by all coalition members, we know what to do. I am part of that WG and will be happy to bring in these debates.<br>
>> <br>
>> Please do share your comments. And I am happy Ian is here as well and can contribute.<br>
>> Hope everyone is doing well,<br>
>> A<br>
>> ------------------------------------------------------<br>
>> Arsène Tungali,<br>
>> IGC Co-Coordinator,<br>
>> Co-founder & Executive Director, Rudi International<br>
>> Facebook - Twitter -LinkedIn<br>
>> Internet Governance - Blogger - ISOC Ambassador - ICANN Fellow - Child Online Protection Evangelist.<br>
>> Democratic Republic of Congo<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Le Vendredi 1 juillet 2016 19h23, Remmy Nweke <<a href="mailto:remmyn@gmail.com">remmyn@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Thanks Ian for the update.<br>
>> There are some issues I should have revisited but since you said there is room for refining and expansion I will leave them when the group resumes.<br>
>> Nice to bring us up to speed.<br>
>> Remmy<br>
>> On Jul 1, 2016 6:27 AM, "Ian Peter" <<a href="mailto:ian.peter@ianpeter.com">ian.peter@ianpeter.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Folks, here is a summary of the progress so far of the CSCG Working Group – my personal summary, happy for any comments from other WG members or anyone else interested. Feel free to copy to other lists.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> GENERAL AGREEMENT SO FAR<br>
>>> Maintain “coalition of coalitions” model<br>
>>> Two year terms for coalition representatives, 2 reps per member, stand down after max two terms (4 years) before being eligible for re-election again<br>
>>> Chair elected by members – can be from among members or an outsider<br>
>>> Chair plus up to two co-chairs – co-chairs from member reps.<br>
>>> Nomcoms are one rep per member coalition plus separate non voting chair<br>
>>> Scope to remain solely to ensure a coordinated civil society response and conduit when it comes to making civil society appointments to outside bodies.<br>
>>> Support to develop separate entity - but related body- to look at funding issues for civil society representatives travel (eg CSCG members might be trustees of new entity)<br>
>>> ISSUES<br>
>>> Some discussion has taken place on new coalition members, with a general agreement that this might include regional coalitions. However we need to clarify what procedures might be adopted for inclusion of regional coalitions and other potential new members.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> STILL TO DO<br>
>>> REFINE AND EXPAND ON SUGGESTED DIRECTIONS ABOVE<br>
>>> REVISE PROCEDURES<br>
>>> OUTREACH ISSUES<br>
>>> <br>
>>> We hope to wrap up this work by end August.<br>
>>> <br>
>>> Ian Peter<br>
>>><br>
>>> ____________________________________________________________<br>
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>>><br>
>> <br>
>> ____________________________________________________________<br>
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>><br>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>><br>
>> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ________________________________<br>
>> ____________________________________________________________<br>
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>><br>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>><br>
>> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ____________________________________________________________<br>
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>><br>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>><br>
>> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>><br>
> ________________________________<br>
> ____________________________________________________________<br>
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
> <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
><br>
> For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
> <a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
><br>
> Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
</p>