<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">Pranesh,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">As Padmini says her question was in two parts, could the response have been for the first question and not for the questions together? I have observed that in panel discussions, in q&a sometimes the questions are either not so well communicated, or not clearly heard and understood. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">A No to the first part of the question is possible. It is well known that US Government would not easily agree to a change in Jurisdiction. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">But on the second part of the question, I would be very very surprised if US would say that its support for the multistakeholder process is conditional. It can not possibly be. Any national government that supports the multistakeholder process would so at a fundamental level, unconditionally.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">Hope that there is some clarification received from Larry Strickling on this.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small;color:#333333">Sivasubramanian M</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/sivasubramanian.muthusamy" target="_blank">Sivasubramanian M</a></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Diego Rafael Canabarro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:diegocanabarro@gmail.com" target="_blank">diegocanabarro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">You are completely right in that assessment. Agenda setting as political power 101. </p><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">Em 20/10/2015 15:02, "Dominique Lacroix" <<a href="mailto:dl@panamo.eu" target="_blank">dl@panamo.eu</a>> escreveu:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Maybe Larry Strickling's announce at the NetMundial, about Icann's
possible freedom, was just a great tactical move, after Snowden's
affair and Dilma Roussef's anger.<br>
<br>
Let's recognize that it was of great art!<br>
As a proof: we are still surmising about the real meaning and
possible consequences...<br>
<br>
May I remind you a little photo story:<br>
<a href="http://reseaux.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/04/23/netmundial-anatomie-promesse/" target="_blank">http://reseaux.blog.lemonde.fr/2014/04/23/netmundial-anatomie-promesse/</a><br>
<br>
@+, best regards, Dom<br>
<br>
--<br>
Dominique Lacroix<br>
<a href="https://panamo.eu" target="_blank">https://panamo.eu</a><br>
<br>
<div>Le 20/10/2015 13:21, Mueller, Milton L
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>No quite accurate.
He was asked whether the US Congress would support changing the jurisdiction of ICANN.
He said no.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>-----Original Message-----
From: <a href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a> [<a href="mailto:governance" target="_blank">mailto:governance</a>-
<a href="mailto:request@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>] On Behalf Of Pranesh Prakash
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:11 AM
To: BestBits <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net" target="_blank"><bestbits@lists.bestbits.net></a>; <a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
Subject: [governance] US Support for Multistakeholder Governance is
Conditional on US Remaining in Control
At a meeting with civil society actors, Larry Strickling of the US NTIA was
asked by my colleague Padmini whether the US Congress would support the
multistakeholder model if ICANN's jurisdiction were to shift.
He said that it wouldn't.
<a href="https://twitter.com/pranesh/status/656422297876561921" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/pranesh/status/656422297876561921</a>
--
Pranesh Prakash
Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society <a href="http://cis-india.org" target="_blank">http://cis-india.org</a> | tel:+91
<a href="tel:80%2040926283" value="+918040926283" target="_blank">80 40926283</a> <a href="mailto:sip:pranesh@ostel.co" target="_blank">sip:pranesh@ostel.co</a> | <a>xmpp:pranesh@cis-india.org</a>
<a href="https://twitter.com/pranesh" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/pranesh</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre></pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
To be removed from the list, visit:
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a>
For all other list information and functions, see:
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>