<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 09 June 2015 08:51 PM,
Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Parminder,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The link does not seem to work in your paragraph below. Can
you : </div>
<div><i><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br>
</span></i></div>
<blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px;border:none;padding:0px">
<div><i><span style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">That is one
definition of the term, looking at it from a domestic
point of view. </span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://international%20jurisdiction/"
target="_blank" style="font-size:12.8000001907349px">Here</a><span
style="font-size:12.8000001907349px"> is another way to
look at it, coming from a global point of view - and of
course this current discussion comes from a global point
of view. </span></i> <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sorry, it is
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.icrc.org/eng/war-and-law/international-criminal-jurisdiction/overview-international-criminal-jurisdiction.htm">https://www.icrc.org/eng/war-and-law/international-criminal-jurisdiction/overview-international-criminal-jurisdiction.htm</a>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As for setting ICANN "under international law", unless I am
mistaken (and I may very well overlook other ways), I see
basically three ways:</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
A good attempt, and we can work on it, but not sure 3 below can be
done without writing the necessary international law for it, which
is only possible through an inter governmental treaty (1 below),
like in France or India or any other country, whatever be the
constitution of a body, it has to be anchored in an existing or new
law written by the parliament. And if, still pursing the national
level analogy, a new kind of governance body has to be developed,
with monopoly governance functions and powers, like ICANN is,
whatever be its constitution, most likely a new national law will be
required for it, through the only route that law can be developed. <br>
<br>
It is important to note here that I am making a distinction between
the constitution of any body, its various processes, its
accountability means and so on, and the law needed to anchor it or
support it, or evne bring it into being. This distinction I see
being lost in some of the discussions here. The former can be
multistakeholder or whatever, but there are some given ways in which
laws can be developed. Unless of course there is some proposal here
to propose new ways of developing law (which is what I fight unclear
or incongruent in Brazil's comments). I will like to know what is
your and other people's position on this matter. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<ol>
<li>the traditional one for the creation of international
organizations, ie: an intergovernmental treaty <br>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I cannot see how can a global governance body - with monopoly
governance functions of the importance that ICANN deals with, can be
formed without its anchoring in international law, which can only be
written through an intergovernmental treaty. And again, my direct
question, is there a proposal to take some new law making route here
which is non intergovernmental. <br>
<br>
Even NTIA's condition (not that I consider my thinking bound by it)
was that they will not accept NTIA role to be replaced by an
intergov organisation solution..... I dont read it to means that
whatever organsation replaced NTIA role may not be formulated by
international law/ treaty which can only be arrived in an intergov
way. In fact, as we well know, unless we are keen to forget basic
political sceince lessons, only law alone can reign the power of law
makers - as so many laws are written with precise objective to
constrain the powers of governments and their various bodies. In the
same way, <br>
<br>
So, yes, I think there is no way other than to seek an inter-gov
treaty - which in my view should<br>
<br>
(1) Sanctify the present way of constituting and working of ICANN
and its associated bodies (with minimal accountability related
improvements that get agreed to by everyone) . Such a treaty then
limits what limit what (all) governments can and cannot do in the
area of global Internet's basic techno-logical policies and
management. <br>
<br>
(2) Put an oversight body over ICANN with minimal well defined
functions, that is constituted in trans-national but non
governmental fashion, but consists to representatives from groups
that are outside the typical ICANN community and notionally can be
considered as a loosely representing a broad spectrum of social
sectors that use ICANN services (which of course everyone does). We
can take reps from well defined global constituencies like media
association, science associations, disability groups, women orgs,
education professionals, health professionals, ethnic groups and so
on. Almost all these sectors have global representative bodies which
more or less are universally accepted. Yes, there certainly be some
arbitrariness in this, but such an arrangement serves the basic
requirement of (1) trans-national global representative which is not
intergov system, and (2) separation of power and 'external
accountability' vis a vic ICANN community. The main function of the
oversight body will be ensure compliance of ICANN decisions with
international law and its own bylaws and set of guiding principles.
<br>
<br>
(3) Some kind of digital bench of the International court of justice
or some similar solution, to which the decisions of ICANN oversight
body or of ICANN itself can be taken, with due process, and under
given conditions. I dont agree to appeal process that are fashioned
on arbitration because while they serve the purpose of private law -
contractual isssues among various parties, all of which are
relatively empowered, they ill serve the purpose of pulbic law and
justice, which involves general public interest, those of the common
person on the street who can never successfully use IRP like
processes, these are simply not developed for such a purpose. <br>
<br>
This proposal has been made by me quite a number of times on these
lists , and therefore there is nothing new in it . The comments of
Roberto Bissio, Adviser to CCWG , also contain some elements that
are comparable to the above proposal.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<ol>
<li>providing ICANN in whatever jurisdiction it may be
incorporated (US or other), with privileges and immunities
that would make its decisions non susceptible of recourse
in front of the local courts<br>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I am unable to see how any government or rather state will give a
blanket immunity to an organisation, unless in pursuance of an
international agreement (which would also provide alternative
accountability and means of recourse). In any case, an organisation
like ICANN does need some kind of external check on its powers.
However, if you have clear proposal about what and how exactly what
you say can be done, and will work, please share, if possible with
examples and/ or analogies. <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<ol>
<li>invent a new type of international organization, founded
by a diversity of stakeholders (and not only governments),
with appropriate independence and guarantees <br>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I have proposed one above (as also often earlier). What exactly is
your proposal and how will it work. And do you envisae such an
'invention' beign done and sustainef without supporting
international law. I cant see how it is possible. But perhaps you
can explain. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Are you advocating in favor of option 1)?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have made my position clear above... It is 1 plus 3 in a way.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Would you be amenable to option 2), if there are sufficient
accountability mechanisms (including the enhanced IRP proposed
by the CCWG)? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
As mentioned above, I cant understand how 2 works. Please help by
explaining. Further I have mentioned my preference for public
interest/ law institutions like some kind of international court
over private law/ interest ones, and also given my reasons.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Do you have suggestions regarding option 3)? We would all
be happy to identify a new approach. <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, I shard it. Look forward to your and other views.<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGF_KH8JKx1NrPU40zqXJBbZLjUVFsO=1ZFucL=EE_0PxDW2LA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bertrand</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<table
style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:13px;line-height:1em;color:rgb(38,38,38)"
border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" width="600">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="5"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:13px;color:rgb(176,173,176)">
<td colspan="3">"<em>Le plus beau métier des hommes,
c'est d'unir les hommes</em>", Antoine de Saint
Exupéry<br>
("<em>There is no greater mission for humans than
uniting humans</em>")</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="10"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><span
style="color:rgb(0,138,204);text-transform:uppercase">BERTRAND
DE LA CHAPELLE</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">Internet & Jurisdiction Project
| Director</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">email <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bdelachapelle@internetjurisdiction.net"
alt="email Bertrand de la Chapelle"
style="color:rgb(159,157,159);text-decoration:none"
target="_blank">bdelachapelle@internetjurisdiction.net</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">email <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:bdelachapelle@gmail.com" alt="email
Bertrand de la Chapelle"
style="color:rgb(159,157,159);text-decoration:none"
target="_blank">bdelachapelle@gmail.com</a></td>
</tr>
<tr colspan="3">
<td>twitter <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://twitter.com/IJurisdiction"
alt="Internet & Jurisdiction Twitter
Accompt"
style="color:rgb(159,157,159);text-decoration:none"
target="_blank">@IJurisdiction</a> | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://twitter.com/bdelachapelle"
alt="Paul Fehlinger Twitter"
style="color:rgb(159,157,159);text-decoration:none"
target="_blank">@bdelachapelle</a></td>
</tr>
<tr colspan="3">
<td>mobile <span style="color:rgb(159,157,159)">+33
(0)6 11 88 33 32</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net"
alt="Internet & Jurisdiction Website"
style="color:rgb(159,157,159);text-decoration:none"
target="_blank">www.internetjurisdiction.net</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="5"><br>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3"><img moz-do-not-send="true"
src="http://www.internetjurisdiction.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/InternetJurisdiction-Logo-w300px.png"
alt="A GLOBAL MULTI-STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE
PROCESS" style="margin:0px;border:none"
width="300"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" height="5"><br>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:48 PM,
parminder <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net" target="_blank">parminder@itforchange.net</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><span class=""> <br>
<br>
<div>On Tuesday 09 June 2015 07:39 PM, Matthias C.
Kettemann wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear all, <br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_extra">we should really be careful
in using legal terminology. "International
jurisdiction" usually means that in light of an
international set of facts the courts of a certain
country will be most suited to hear the case (see
e.g. <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/glossary/international-jurisdiction_en.htm"
target="_blank">here</a>).</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</span> That is one definition of the term, looking at it
from a domestic point of view. <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://International%20jurisdiction"
target="_blank">Here</a> is another way to look at it,
coming from a global point of view - and of course this
current discussion comes from a global point of view. <br>
<span class=""> <br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"> Conflicts of jurisdiciton
(and conflicts of law) are a daily occurence in
online settings. International courts, however,
are a different matter entirely. They are few and
far between and, in their present design, are not
in a position to ensure accountability. For that
we need more permanent oversight structures. I'm
not convinced that only a national legal anchor
can do the trick. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</span> That is the point. So then what international
option do we have? If we are to live a common digital
future, with an adequately global Internet, we have to
find the necessary legal and political ways to do it, even
if they do not exist today. I am much more convinced than
others here that there is enough existing that can be
evolved in the right direction - but to do that the
political will has to first be stated and worked with.<br>
<br>
If international law and jurisdiction can be begun to be
evolved in such a complex and contested area like
international crime, it should certainly be so much easier
to do with regard to management of basic techno-logical
infrastructure of the Internet, where there is, at least
at present, so less to dispute, and the positive advantage
so huge.<br>
<br>
Please note this sentence from the submission of Roberto
Bissio, a top global civil society leader, made to the
CCWG process - he is an official adviser to the process.
(This submission was earlier forwarded by Carlos to these
elists, but I am enclosing it again.)<br>
<br>
"The International Criminal Court was negotiated and
ratified in as much time as the discussion of the
governance of ICANN is already taking."<br>
<br>
Does this say something?<br>
<br>
And do we not know what kind of international innovations
are daily invented, like in the area of IP enforcement,
and trade dispute settlement, and now also 'investor
protection' for global corporates from domestic policies/
law and even courts, when it is in the interest of the
most powerful countries. Why do we then shy away from
institutional innovations when genuine public interest is
involved. It is a case of greater internationalisation
where it suits them, and full scepticism about
international law and jurisdiction where is does not. That
is not ok.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
parminder <br>
</font></span>
<div>
<div class="h5"> <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">International law,
however, does not yet provide for accountability
structures for the 'management' and
administration of the stability, security etc.
of the global Internet.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">Kind regards<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
Matthias<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at
3:49 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de"
target="_blank">wolfgang.kleinwaechter@medienkomm.uni-halle.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Parminder,<br>
<br>
can you specify what do you understand under
"international jurisdiction"? Do you want to
create an "International (Internet) Court"?
Do you want to have ICANN under the
International Court of Justice in The Hague?
International Courts are created by
intergovernmental treaties. Here is a list
of "International Courts":<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_court"
target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_court</a>.<br>
<br>
Wolfgang<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----<br>
Von: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
im Auftrag von parminder<br>
Gesendet: Di <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:09.06.2015%2015"
value="+49906201515" target="_blank">09.06.2015
15</a>:41<br>
An: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a>;
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law;
Mawaki Chango<br>
Betreff: Re: [governance] IANA transition -
BR Gov comments on the CCWG-Accountability
Draft Proposal<br>
<div>
<div><br>
<br>
<br>
On Tuesday 09 June 2015 06:26 PM,
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of<br>
Law wrote:<br>
><br>
> I think that bodies which do not
need to fear supervision by<br>
> legitimate courts end up like FIFA.
FIFA had a legal status in<br>
> Switzerland that basically
insulated it the way that the Brazilian<br>
> document seems to suggest would be
what they want for ICANN. (It's<br>
> also the legal status ICANN has at
times suggested it would like.)<br>
><br>
> The lesson of history seems
unusually clear here.<br>
<br>
Agree that ICANN cannot be left
jurisdictionally un-supervised - that<br>
may be even more dangerous than the
present situation. However, the<br>
right supervision or oversight is of
international jurisdiction and law,<br>
not that of the US . This is what Brazil
has to make upfront as the<br>
implication of what it is really
seeking, and its shyness and reticence<br>
to say so is what I noted as surprising
in an earlier email in this<br>
thread. Not putting out clearly what
exactly it wants would lead to<br>
misconceptions about its position, which
IMHO can be seen from how<br>
Michael reads it. I am sure this is not
how Brazil meant it - to free<br>
ICANN from all kinds of jurisdictional
oversight whatsoever - but then<br>
Brazil needs to say clearly what is it
that it wants, and how can it can<br>
obtained. Brazil, please come out of
your NetMundial hangover and take<br>
political responsibility for what you
say and seek!<br>
<br>
parminder<br>
<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Mawaki Chango
wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> It's good to see a law scholar
involved in this discussion. I'll<br>
>> leave it to the Brazilian party
to<br>
>> ultimate tell whether your
reading is correct or not. In the
meantime<br>
>> I'd volunteer the following<br>
>> comments.<br>
>><br>
>> On Jun 8, 2015 10:46 PM,
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of
Law"<br>
>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:froomkin@law.miami.edu"
target="_blank">froomkin@law.miami.edu</a>>
wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > Perhaps I'm misreading
something, but I read this document to
make<br>
>> the following assertions:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > 1. All restrictions on
ICANN's location must be removed.<br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> And the question reopened for
deliberation by all stakeholders,<br>
>> including governments among
others.<br>
>> Only the outcome of such
deliberation will be fully legitimate
within<br>
>> the framework of the post-2015<br>
>> ICANN.<br>
>><br>
>> > 2. ICANN does not have to
leave the US but must be located in a<br>
>> place where the governing law
has<br>
>> certain characteristics,
including not having the possibiliity
that<br>
>> courts overrule ICANN (or at<br>
>> least the IRP).<br>
>> ><br>
>> > (And, as it happens, the
US is not such a place....)<br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> Not only avoiding courts
overruling relevant outcomes of the
Internet<br>
>> global community processes,<br>
>> but also examining and
resolving the possible
interferences/conflicts<br>
>> that might arise for<br>
>> government representatives
being subject to a foreign country law<br>
>> simply in the process of
attending<br>
>> to their regular duties (if
they were to be fully engaged with
ICANN).<br>
>><br>
>> Quote:<br>
>> "From the Brazilian perspective
the existing structure clearly imposes
limits to the participation<br>
>><br>
> ??<br>
> ?of governmental representatives,
as it is unlikely that a representative
of a foreign government wi<br>
>> ll be authorized (by its own
government) to formally accept a
position in a body pertaining to a U.<br>
>><br>
>> S. corporation."<br>
>><br>
>> This may be what you're getting
at with your point 3 below, but I'm<br>
>> not sure whether the problem is<br>
>> only the fact that governments
have to deal with a corporate form/law<br>
>> or whether it is altogether<br>
>> the fact that it is a single
country law without any form of<br>
>> deliberate endorsement by the
other<br>
>> governments (who also have law
making power in their respective<br>
>> country just as the US
government).<br>
>><br>
>> Assuming your reading is
correct, and if necessary complemented
by my<br>
>> remarks above, I'd be<br>
>> interested in hearing from you
about any issues you may see with the<br>
>> BR gov comments.<br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>><br>
>> Mawaki<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> > 3. ICANN doesn't have to
change its form, but it needs a form
where<br>
>> governments are comfortable.<br>
>> ><br>
>> > (And, as it happens, the
corporate form is not such a form....)<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > What am I missing?<br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Carlos
A. Afonso wrote:<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> For the ones who are
following the IANA transition process:
attached<br>
>> >> please find the
comments posted by the government of
Brazil on<br>
>> June 03,<br>
>> >> 2015, in response to
the call for public comments on the<br>
>> >> CCWG-Accountability
Initial Draft Proposal.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I generally agree with
the comments.<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> fraternal regards<br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --c.a.<br>
>> >><br>
>> ><br>
>> > --<br>
>> > A. Michael Froomkin, <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://law.tm" target="_blank">http://law.tm</a><br>
>> > Laurie Silvers &
Mitchell Rubenstein Distinguished
Professor of Law<br>
>> > Editor, Jotwell: The
Journal of Things We Like (Lots), <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://jotwell.com"
target="_blank">jotwell.com</a><br>
>> > Program Chair, We Robot
2016 | <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1%20%28305%29%20284-4285"
value="+13052844285" target="_blank">+1
(305) 284-4285</a> | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:froomkin@law.tm"
target="_blank">froomkin@law.tm</a><br>
>> > U. Miami School of Law,
P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124
USA<br>
>> >
-->It's warm here.<--<br>
>> >
____________________________________________________________<br>
>> ><br>
>> > You received this message
as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > To be removed from the
list, visit:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > For all other list
information and functions, see:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > To edit your profile and
to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>> ><br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Translate this email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> >
____________________________________________________________<br>
>> > You received this message
as a subscriber on the list:<br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
>> > To be removed from the
list, visit:<br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > For all other list
information and functions, see:<br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
>> > To edit your profile and
to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
>> > <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Translate this email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>
____________________________________________________________<br>
> You received this message as a
subscriber on the list:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
><br>
> For all other list information and
functions, see:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
> To edit your profile and to find
the IGC's charter, see:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
><br>
> Translate this email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
><br>
><br>
>
____________________________________________________________<br>
> You received this message as a
subscriber on the list:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
> To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
><br>
> For all other list information and
functions, see:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
> To edit your profile and to find
the IGC's charter, see:<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
><br>
> Translate this email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on
the list:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org"
target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and
functions, see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's
charter, see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<br>
-- <br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<p>Dr. Matthias C.
Kettemann, LL.M.
(Harvard)<br>
<span lang="EN-US">Post-Doc
Fellow | <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.normativeorders.net/de/organisation/mitarbeiter-a-z/person/442"
target="_blank">Cluster
of Excellence „</a></span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.normativeorders.net/de/organisation/mitarbeiter-a-z/person/442"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">Normative
Orders</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.normativeorders.net/de/organisation/mitarbeiter-a-z/person/442"
target="_blank">”</a>,
University of
Frankfurt am Main<br>
</span><span
lang="EN-US">Lecturer
| </span><span
lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://voelkerrecht.uni-graz.at/en/" target="_blank">Institute of
International Law
andInternational
Relations</a>,
University of Graz<br>
</span><span
lang="EN-US"></span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://trainingszentrum-menschenrechte.uni-graz.at/en/infos-fuer-studierende/"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US"></span></a></p>
<p>Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main<br>
Exzellenzcluster
„Normative Ordnungen“<br>
Max-Horkheimer-Straße 2<br>
60629 Frankfurt am Main
/ Germany</p>
<span>
<p
style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt">E
| <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:matthias.kettemann@gmail.com" target="_blank">matthias.kettemann@gmail.com</a><br>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://internationallawandtheinternet.blogspot.com/"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">Blog</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"> | </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://ssrn.com/author=1957909"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">SSRN</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"> | </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://scholar.google.ch/citations?user=8jRGt2QAAAAJ"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">Google
Scholar</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"> | </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://twitter.com/#%21/MCKettemann"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">Twitter</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"> | </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.facebook.com/matthias.kettemann"
target="_blank"><span
lang="EN-US">Facebook</span></a><span
lang="EN-US"> | </span><span
lang="EN-US"><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/116310540881122884114/posts"
target="_blank">Google+</a></span></p>
<p
style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt">Recent
publications: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.intersentia.co.uk/searchDetail.aspx?bookId=103066&authors=Wolfgang"
style="font-size:10pt" target="_blank"><br>
The Common Interest
in International Law
(2014, co-editor)</a>
<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.nwv.at/recht/verfassungsrecht/1077_european_yearbook_on_human_rights_2014/"
style="font-size:10pt" target="_blank"><br>
European Yearbook on
Human Rights 2014
(2014, co-editor)</a><span
style="font-size:10pt"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://book.coe.int/eur/en/human-rights-and-democracy/5810-freedom-of-expression-and-the-internet.html"
target="_blank"><br>
Freedom of
Expression and the
Internet (2014,
co-author)</a></span><span
lang="EN-US"></span>
</p>
</span><span lang="EN-US"></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>