<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'> <BR><font face="Times New Roman" size="2" style="font-size: 10pt;"><font face="Times New Roman"> <BR><font size="3">
<span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Hi John, <o:p></o:p></font></span><p><font size="3">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">Thanks for your feedback. </font></font></span><BR><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">Net
neutrality as defined in the text mirrors the definition of freedom of
expression under international human rights standards (see eg ICCPR). I agree that freedom to
seek, impart and receive any kind of information and ideas may sound
incompatible with censorship (and indeed it should be) but defining FoE or NN does not mean that those principles cannot have limitations. Neither NN nor FoE is an</font></font></span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3"> absolute principle and both can be limited. However, </font></font></span><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">in order to avoid abusive behaviours, such limitations should be provided by law or regulations and be necessary and proportionate to a
legitimate purpose. </font></font></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3"></font></font></span> </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">The Model
Framework on Network Neutrality, that was elaborated by the DCNN, defines net neutrality
and lists exceptions to equal treatment </font><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font size="3"> </font></span><font size="3">(eg
give effect to law and court order; network security and integrity; etc). See <a href="http://www.networkneutrality.info/sources.html">http://www.networkneutrality.info/sources.html</a><o:p></o:p></font></font></span></p><font size="3">
</font><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">However the
current Draft NN statement (which is based on the previous work of the DCNN) is meant to be a
principle statement rather than a model regulatory framework. In my opinion, the
definition of exceptions to net neutrality should be included in a regulatory
framework rather than in a principle statement. </font><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font size="3"> </font></span><font size="3">Don’t you agree? <o:p></o:p></font></font></span><p><font size="3">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Anyway, you are raising a valid point and, fortunately, the second comment period
just opened and will close in 10 days, so you (and everyone else) are free to express
your concerns commenting the draft statement via the googledoc and pad listed below :)</font></font></span><BR><font size="3">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">And yes,
both private sector and administrative entities were involved. </font><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"><font size="3"> </font></span><font size="3">And as I said, this document is still a draft
and the purpose of my email is indeed to stimulate further constructive critiques. </font></font></span><BR><font size="3">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Best, <o:p></o:p></font></font></span><BR><font size="3">
</font><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;"><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Luca<o:p></o:p></font></font></span><BR><font size="3">
</font><BR></font> <BR></font></font></font><BR><div><hr id="stopSpelling">From: jlaprise@gmail.com<br>To: lucabelli@hotmail.it; governance@lists.igcaucus.org; internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org<br>Subject: RE: [Internet Policy] FW: [Disarmed] [nncoalition] [Disarmed] Request for Comments - Statements on Net Neutrality <br>Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:28:27 -0500<br><br><style><!--
.ExternalClass p.ecxMsoNormal, .ExternalClass li.ecxMsoNormal, .ExternalClass div.ecxMsoNormal {
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
}
.ExternalClass a:link, .ExternalClass span.ecxMsoHyperlink {
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;
}
.ExternalClass span.ecxMsoHyperlinkFollowed {
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;
}
.ExternalClass p {
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
}
.ExternalClass span.ecxEmailStyle18 {
font-family:"Garamond",serif;
color:#1F497D;
}
.ExternalClass span.ecxEmailStyle19 {
font-family:"Garamond",serif;
color:windowtext;
}
.ExternalClass .ecxMsoChpDefault {
font-size:10.0pt;
}
.ExternalClass div.ecxWordSection1 {
}
--></style><div class="ecxWordSection1"><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><a name="_MailEndCompose" target="_blank"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>Hi Luca,</span></a></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>I like and agree with it but it is a non-starter for governments and the private sector. As defined in the document, network neutrality would ban censorship and undermine IPR. Were members of either stakeholder group involved in the fashioning of this statement?</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>I think its dead on arrival.</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>Best regards, </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif; font-size: 16pt;'>John Laprise, Ph.D.</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>Consulting Scholar</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/" target="_blank"><span style='color: rgb(5, 99, 193); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'>http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/</span></a><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p></div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: "Garamond",serif;'> </span></p><div><div style="border-width: 1pt medium medium; border-style: solid none none; border-color: rgb(225, 225, 225) currentColor currentColor; padding: 3pt 0in 0in;"><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><b><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'>From:</span></b><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;'> InternetPolicy [mailto:internetpolicy-bounces@elists.isoc.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Luca Belli<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 18, 2015 4:37 PM<br><b>To:</b> governance@lists.igcaucus.org; internetpolicy@elists.isoc.org<br><b>Subject:</b> [Internet Policy] FW: [Disarmed] [nncoalition] [Disarmed] Request for Comments - Statements on Net Neutrality </span></p></div></div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"> </p><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif;'> </span></p><div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Dear all (apologies for cross-posting), </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Many thanks for the numerous comments to the initial draft statement (see eg </span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BEqqs7DXEpSnuK5kBOXIXoJKEgdlh-ExZyYQ92CJ7eI/edit" target="_blank">this google doc)</a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>. The DRAFT 2.0 is in attachment and can be commented on using this <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KHDQgok9H4LsNFUkLskayWNYUTWcnzRl3D6Pt_BE5VI/edit" target="_blank">googledoc</a>, this<a href="https://etherpad.mozilla.org/sBfLYGHBvc" target="_blank"> pad</a> or via <a href="http://mailman.edri.org/mailman/listinfo/nncoalition" target="_blank">the mailing-list</a> of the Dynamic Coalition on network Neutrality (DCNN).</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Comments converged as regards the need for a concise NN statement that may be compatible but independent from the Model Framework on Network Neutrality (MF), elaborated by the DCNN and presented at the 8<sup>th</sup> IGF. </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Michael and I (the drafters) consolidated the received comments into a quite concise Draft 2.0 and would like to have your advise on whether to include or not the specialised service provisions in this Draft. The possible options would be to: </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>(i)</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 7pt;"> </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Have a separate statement on specialised services. In this case a specialised service statement will be circulated in the forthcoming days for comments. </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>(ii)</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 7pt;"> </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Include concise specialised service provisions in the attached Draft 2.0. This option may provide a more complete text but may also make it more difficult to reach consensus on the Statement. </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-indent: -0.5in;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>(iii)</span><span style="color: black; font-size: 7pt;"> </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Include detailed provisions on specialised service in an updated version of the MF. Such option would allow to have both a principle-statement, expressing a common IGF vision on NN, and a detailed MF 2.0 supported by DCNN members (and perhaps by GNN members?) providing specific indications on how to frame both NN and specialized services. </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>The deadline to comment this second draft is <b>Saturday 29 May</b>. Subsequently a final draft will be shared and, if needed, an extra 10-day comment period will be opened. </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Thanks a lot for your contributions! </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Best,</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Luca</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif;'></span></p></div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p></div><blockquote id="ecxreplyBlockquote" style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt; border-style: none none none solid; border-color: currentColor currentColor currentColor blue; padding: 0in 0in 0in 6pt;"><div id="ecxwmQuoteWrapper"><blockquote style="border-width: medium medium medium 1.5pt; border-style: none none none solid; border-color: currentColor currentColor currentColor blue; padding: 0in 0in 0in 6pt;"><div id="ecxwmQuoteWrapper"><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Dear all, (apologies for crossposting)<br><br>This is a Request for Comments with regard to the development of two Policy Statements on Net Neutrality promoted by members of the <a href="http://www.networkneutrality.info/members.html" target="_blank">IGF Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality</a> (DCNN) and the <a href="https://www.thisisnetneutrality.org/?lang=en" target="_blank">Global Coalition on Net Neutrality</a> (GNN), to be discussed within the IGF community at-large.</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><b><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>SUBJECT</span></b><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br>The development of the DRAFT Net Neutrality Policy Statements aims at promoting the endorsement of an agreed position on net neutrality by the IGF community, based on the <a href="http://www.networkneutrality.info/sources.html" target="_blank">Model Framework on Network Neutrality</a> developed by the DCNN.</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>The development of these Policy Statements is consistent with the <a href="http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/igf-meeting/igf-2014-istanbul/308-igf-2014-chairs-summary-final/file" target="_blank">Final Chair's Summary of the IGF 2014</a>, according to which "The ninth IGF concluded with looking at the role of the IGF in taking the network neutrality discussion forward. [...] The Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality will continue the discussions leading up to the 2015 meeting, but the view was also held that there was a need to develop a process that allowed the entire IGF community to weigh in and validate the findings of the Dynamic Coalition."</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>The DCNN Model Framework (MF) was presented at the 8th IGF in Bali and included in a Report on "<a href="http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/media/cdmsi/CDMSI%282013%29Misc19_en.pdf" target="_blank">Protecting Human Rights through Network Neutrality</a>" delivered to the Council of Europe Steering Committee on Media and Information Society to be used as a working document for the elaboration of a Draft Recommendation on Net Neutrality. To date, the MF has been conveyed to several Parliamentary assemblies (EU Parliament, Argentinian Senate and South Korean Parliament) by DCNN members. However, although it has already played an inspirational role, the model has never been officially validated by the IGF community at-large, as pointed out by the Chairs Summary. This lack of validation is primarily due to the lack of an official validation process for dynamic coalitions' outcomes within the IGF structure. The development of the Policy Statements aims therefore at filling this gap through a self-organised and bottom-up process, which is the very essence of the IGF.</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br><b>DRAFT POLICY STATEMENTS</b></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>During the <a href="https://www.rightscon.org/index" target="_blank">RightsCon</a> joint meeting of the DCNN and the GNN, consensus emerged as regards the elaboration of one or more DRAFT Net Neutrality Policy Statement(s) to be presented to the IGF MAG and discussed - and hopefully endorsed - by the IGF community at-large. </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br>T</span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>he initial DRAFT policy statements are in attachment. The first policy statement (I. On Network Neutrality) aims at providing a concise and "human readable" version of the MF, while the second statement (II. On Specialised Services) aims at expanding the MF definition and provisions on specialised services, adding some further elements. </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>The statements also include a </span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>"restyling" of the MF (APPENDIX Model Framework v.2.0). The original provisions of the MF have been reorganised within this restyled version, in order to identify with more clarity the key issues that should be evoked in the policy statements. The only modification to the MF content concerns the expansion of the specialised service provisions, in order include the additional elements that are proposed in Statement II.</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br><b>DRAFTERS </b><br>According to <a href="http://www.networkneutrality.info/about.html" target="_blank">DC NN Rules of Procedure</a>, two drafters have been designated in order to "manage the elaboration of the position or statement and consolidate received comments with the aim of achieving a consensus document." </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>The two individuals who volunteered as drafters are:</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>- Luca Belli, DCNN Co-Chair and Researcher at the Center for Technology & Society, FGV Rio de Janeiro </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>- Michał Woźniak, Warsaw Hackerspace and Polish Linux Users Group</span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br><b>CALENDAR</b><br>Comments to this initial DRAFT should be sent by <b>10 May 2015</b>. </span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>After this deadline, the drafters will consolidate the comments and provide an updated draft that will be shared for a second round of comments.</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>According to DCNN Rules of procedure, "DCNN members will be provided with 14 calendar days to comment, followed by a revised draft, and 10 calendar days to comment the revised draft." To foster the inclusion of widest number of comments from the IGF community at-large, all individuals will be allowed</span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> to comment the Draft statements using <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BEqqs7DXEpSnuK5kBOXIXoJKEgdlh-ExZyYQ92CJ7eI/edit" target="_blank">this google doc</a> and <a href="https://netneutralitystatements.etherpad.mozilla.org/1" target="_blank">this Pad</a>.</span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p><p class="ecxMsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>Y</span><span lang="EN-GB" style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>ou are also free to share your inputs and critiques writing to the DCNN mailing-list </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><a href="https://email07.europe.secureserver.net/webmail.php?folder=INBOX&firstMessage=1" target="_blank">nncoalition@mailman.edri.org</a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 14pt;'> </span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'>to which you can subscribe <a href="http://mailman.edri.org/mailman/listinfo/nncoalition" target="_blank">following this link</a>. </span></p><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><br>Thanks in advance for your comments and, please, do not hesitate to share this email.<br>Best regards, <br>Luca</span></p></div></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'><a title="Luca Belli" href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-belli/24/20/1a4" target="_blank">Luca Belli</a>, PhD</span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 8pt;'>Researcher, <a title="Center for Technology & Society, FGV Rio de Janeiro" href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">Center for Technology & Society, FGV Rio de Janeiro</a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 8pt;'>Founder and Co-chair, <a title="Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality" href="http://networkneutrality.info/about.html" target="_blank">IGF Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality</a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 8pt;'>Co-founder and Co-chair, <a title="IGF Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility" href="http://platformresponsibility.info/" target="_blank">IGF Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility</a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'> </span></p></div><div><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 8pt;'><a title="Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality" href="http://networkneutrality.info/about.html" target="_blank"><br></a></span><span style='color: black; font-family: "Verdana",sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;'></span></p></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><p class="ecxMsoNormal"><span style='font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif;'><br>_______________________________________________ NNcoalition mailing list <a href="mailto:NNcoalition@mailman.edri.org">NNcoalition@mailman.edri.org</a> <a href="http://mailman.edri.org/mailman/listinfo/nncoalition" target="_blank">http://mailman.edri.org/mailman/listinfo/nncoalition</a></span></p></div></div></div></div> </div></body>
</html>