<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 27 September 2014 07:45 PM,
      parminder wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:5426C67C.8050105@itforchange.net" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      snip<br>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJwbTiA4S0evA2zbBcMxrLd=Rc9ZkBPKqXx2bkWVTV-pSTBf5g@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><font
                    face="Verdana"> <span class=""><font
                        color="#888888"> <br>
                      </font></span></font></div>
              </blockquote>
              <div>I would be curious to see which developing countries
                make this assertion. </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      See enclosed response from India to ICANN's process of collection
      of views on the IANA transition process. It say clearly that any
      transition arrangement should "have a proper international
      legislative authority". And of course India earlier made the CIRP
      proposal which sought inter-gov oversight of ICANN. Dont know why
      continued ignorance should be professed about this and many other
      stated positions from other developing countries.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJwbTiA4S0evA2zbBcMxrLd=Rc9ZkBPKqXx2bkWVTV-pSTBf5g@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div>From my reading of things it is not countries but
                views of certain groups and can hardly be said to be
                country positions.<br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      If the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://content.netmundial.br/contribution/democratising-global-governance-of-the-internet/164">position

        of the Just Net Coalition</a> is being meant here, it is that
      yes, ICANN oversight mechanism should have internal legal backing/
      authority,</blockquote>
    <br>
    sorry, meant "international legal backing/ authority"<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:5426C67C.8050105@itforchange.net" type="cite">
      but it is not necessary that the precise oversight mechanism be
      inter-gov in the UN sense. To that extent it is different from
      India's position.<br>
      <br>
      parminder <br>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJwbTiA4S0evA2zbBcMxrLd=Rc9ZkBPKqXx2bkWVTV-pSTBf5g@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div> <br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><font
                    face="Verdana"><span class=""><font color="#888888">
                        parminder <br>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                      </font></span></font>
                  <div>
                    <div class="h5">
                      <div>On Saturday 27 September 2014 02:25 AM,
                        Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:<br>
                      </div>
                      <blockquote type="cite">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div>
                            <div>
                              <div>As I read through all the email
                                discussions, I could not help wondering
                                whether there should be greater
                                awareness done on the roles of
                                stakeholders within the ecosystem. The
                                content of the discussions in relation
                                to domain name racket I could not follow
                                through properly but whilst people are
                                still putting all their eggs in the
                                domain name basket with the gTLD
                                process, hardly anyone talks about the
                                dotless domains and the implication for
                                the current value of the domain name.
                                Can the domain name and dotless domain
                                name be likened to PSTN and NGN in terms
                                of transition? Is it inevitable that the
                                world will shift from domains to more
                                dotless domains or are dotless domains
                                are just a fly by night.<br>
                                <br>
                              </div>
                              Personally I prefer ICANN over ITU any day
                              in terms of being open to hearing the
                              voices of diverse community. ICANN has
                              built in mechanisms for input into various
                              processes. ITU on the other hand remains a
                              closed trunk available only to
                              Governments, Regulators and ICT Private
                              Sector who can afford it, and they have no
                              capacity to be flexible to absorb civil
                              society. In terms of accountability, ICANN
                              leads as all its reports are published
                              open and online and available for easy
                              access by anyone except <i>some</i> of
                              the SSAC reports.<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            <div>However, I can also understand why,
                              sometimes being the oldest UN organisation
                              can make this resistant to change to be
                              more relevant with the dynamics of time.
                              ITU has done fantastic work building and
                              developing toolkits for diverse
                              initiatives within the ICT space and
                              should be commended.<br>
                            </div>
                            <div><br>
                              The ITU has also begun using
                              multistakeholder in their various speeches
                              just as ICANN does for some time now.<br>
                              <br>
                            </div>
                            However, despite my preferences, I can say
                            that both organisations have greater room
                            for even more improvement. However, to do
                            that we as civil society must first get our
                            act together and figure out architecturally,
                            the kind of changes we would like to see
                            happening in the ecosystem to amplify the
                            voice of the common man and the inclusion of
                            <b>ALL</b> our voices.<br>
                            <br>
                          </div>
                          <div>At the same time, we have to come to the
                            realisation that we can treat and respect
                            individual organisations as unique with
                            distinct roles and mandates and perhaps that
                            will make us less likely to try to want to
                            fit square pegs in round holes.<br>
                            <br>
                            :) <br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
                You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
                     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
                  target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
                <br>
                For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
                     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
                  target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
                To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
                     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
                <br>
                Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
                  target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>