<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <font size="+1">Dear Milton<br>
      <br>
      Thanks so much for the heads up on this!  <br>
      <br>
      We quoted from the original submission on this by Avri - made to
      NETmundial online - which we supported. We should have udpated it.
      You are quite right in raising concerns.<br>
      <br>
      We are working right now with Avri to update that part of the
      document to reflect recent discussions. We will change the online
      version.<br>
      <br>
      Anriette<br>
      <br>
      <br>
    </font>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/08/2014 16:50, Milton L Mueller
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:ebd9f2d0c0254f2c9d4d575da45e6cac@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
        medium)">
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Anriette</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>On the whole it is an impressive
            document, and shows that APC is taking laudable initiatives
            on a number of fronts.
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>I was astounded however by the
            document’s complete lack of familiarity with the ongoing
            discussion of the IANA transition.
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Specifically, your document writes:</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Completing the plan to bring The
            Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>functions under Internet Corporation
            for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) as</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>originally documented in the White
            Paper is an advisable and overdue milestone</span><span></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>One of the key issues here is WHETHER
            IANA will remain in ICANN or be structurally separated.
            Typically, only ICANN staff, board members and others with
            an organizational self-interest in retaining control of IANA
            view the transition as a simple matter of “bring[ing] the
            IANA functions under ICANN…”
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Has APC actually come up with a
            deliberate position on this, and if so on what basis? Have
            you bothered to read any of the discussions of this topic
            coming from IGP, ccTLD operators, gTLDs, registrars? Are you
            unaware of the accountability issue raised by the status of
            IANA?
          </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Milton L Mueller</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith
              Professor
            </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Syracuse University School of
              Information Studies</span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/"><span>http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/</span></a>
            </span></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span>From:</span></b><span>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>
                  [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org">mailto:governance-request@lists.igcaucus.org</a>]
                  <b>On Behalf Of </b>Anriette Esterhuysen<br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Friday, August 29, 2014 5:57 AM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>;
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> [governance] APC priorities for IGF
                  2014</span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><span>Attached.<br>
              <br>
              Anriette<br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </span></p>
          <pre>-- </pre>
          <pre>`````````````````````````````````</pre>
          <pre>anriette esterhuysen</pre>
          <pre>executive director</pre>
          <pre>association for progressive communications</pre>
          <pre>po box 29755, melville, 2109, south africa</pre>
          <pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a></pre>
          <pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.apc.org">www.apc.org</a></pre>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
`````````````````````````````````
anriette esterhuysen
executive director
association for progressive communications
po box 29755, melville, 2109, south africa
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:anriette@apc.org">anriette@apc.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.apc.org">www.apc.org</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>