<div dir="ltr">+1 for common understanding.<div>Deirdre</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 July 2014 10:16, Mawaki Chango <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kichango@gmail.com" target="_blank">kichango@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I am ok with "common understanding" (putting the emphasis in my last sentence below on the term "understand" rather than on "definition'.) Note: at times some may also refer to it as working definition, whatever designation people are comfortable with works fine for me, but I like the modest and cooperative tone in "common understanding".<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div>
<br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Mawaki </font></span><div><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Nnenna Nwakanma <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nnenna75@gmail.com" target="_blank">nnenna75@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Should we seek "a common understanding" instead of "definition"?<br><br></div>Just asking<span><font color="#888888"><br><br></font></span></div><span><font color="#888888">N<br>
</font></span></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div>On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Mawaki Chango <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kichango@gmail.com" target="_blank">kichango@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">
<div><div><div dir="ltr"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse"><div>
<div><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:separate;border-spacing:0px"><span style="border-collapse:collapse"><div style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(80,0,80)">
<span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small;color:rgb(34,34,34)">On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva </span><span dir="ltr" style="font-family:arial;font-size:small;color:rgb(34,34,34)"><<a href="mailto:Kivuva@transworldafrica.com" target="_blank">Kivuva@transworldafrica.com</a>></span><span style="font-family:arial;font-size:small;color:rgb(34,34,34)"> wrote:</span><br>
</div></span></span></span></div></div></span></span></span></span></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Ian, probably multistakeholder is not defined yet because it is<br>
composed of two words multiple-stakeholders. And stakeholder too is<br>
composed of two words stake-holder. Technically then, Multistakeholder<br>
is composed of three words<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>It's a totally different question as to whether "mutistakeholderism" needs to be defined despite being made up of parts that are familiar. And I think all definition questions boil down to people struggling to understand precisely what "mutistakeholderism" is or should be.</div>
<span><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div><div>Mawaki</div></font></span></div></div></div>
<br></div></div><div>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org" target="_blank">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>“The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
</div>