<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none"><!--P{margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} .ms-cui-menu {background-color:#ffffff;border:1px rgb(171, 171, 171) solid;font-family:'Segoe UI WPC','Segoe UI',Tahoma,'Microsoft Sans Serif',Verdana,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);} .ms-cui-menusection-title {display:none;} .ms-cui-ctl {vertical-align:text-top;text-decoration:none;color:rgb(51, 51, 51);} .ms-cui-ctl-on {background-color:rgb(223, 237, 250);opacity: 0.8;} .ms-cui-img-cont-float {display:inline-block;margin-top:2px} .ms-cui-smenu-inner {padding-top:0px;} .ms-owa-paste-option-icon {margin: 2px 4px 0px 4px;vertical-align:sub;padding-bottom: 2px;display:inline-block;} .ms-rtePasteFlyout-option:hover {background-color:rgb(223, 237, 250) !important;opacity:1 !important;} .ms-rtePasteFlyout-option {padding:8px 4px 8px 4px;outline:none;} .ms-cui-menusection {float:left; width:85px;height:24px;overflow:hidden}--></style>
</head>
<body>
<div style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">
<p>Those opposing businesses involvement in Internet governance seem to forget who owns and operates the (data) networks being inter-networked across the Internet; not to mention the required consent of the massive legion of -volunteer- techies who keep the
whole thing afloat.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Anyway, it's kind of -late- in the day to begin pining for the 19th century when governments could multilaterally agree on tariffs and two-way revenue splits; it's just not happening now.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>How governments choose to protect and/or abuse their own citizens rights domestically is a whole other matter, but really it is - just silly - to think the Internet can exist without multistakeholder engagement.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>As the Internet has grown in global policy significance, ipso facto, citizens of the world aka civil society, technical community, and businesses, whether dreaded Hollywood IP rights protectionists or -- lots of other businesses engaged in aspects of networking
- will have seats at the table. </p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>A multilateral table can amuse themselves, but not govern the Internet.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>It is that reality which NetMundial recognizes; as does cough cough China/Hong Kong hosting the Internet Hall of Fame dinner 3 weeks ago. (congrats to the winners, including Chinese pioneers, by the way.)</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Anyway, to be 'shocked!' that McKinsey tells businesses to pay attention to how trillions of dollars flow across the Internet through the global economy is shocking only in its presumption that businesses would not be paying attention.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>It does not obviate democracy anywhere, including in participatory global Internet governance processes.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The take-away lesson from Brazil that many took, which is we are playing - in the big leagues now, and have to prepare accordingly - is the correct lesson.
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>In my always humble opinion : )</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Lee<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div style="color: #282828;">
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display: inline-block; width: 98%;">
<div dir="ltr" id="divRplyFwdMsg"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size: 11pt;"><b>From:</b> bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net <bestbits-request@lists.bestbits.net> on behalf of Jean-Christophe NOTHIAS I The Global Journal <jc.nothias@theglobaljournal.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, May 2, 2014 11:51 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Rafik; Adam Peake<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Bits bestbits@lists.bestbits.net; governance@lists.igcaucus.org IGC<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [bestbits] Roles and Responsibilities - CSTD working group on enhanced cooperation</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: #000000; font-family: optima; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; widows: 2;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; widows: 2;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; widows: 2;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: #000000; font-family: optima; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;">McKinsey
supports the idea of a next best stage of democracy and gives to MS its blessings. You are in good company!!!</span></span></span></span></span></div>
<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder">
</div>
<div>See below but in short, here are the best parts:</div>
<div>- "<b>The Role of Companies as citizens</b>" (NEW DEMOCRACY! )</div>
<div>- When we say that what is happening in IG threatens much more than the IG itself: " <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><b>Why couldn’t we disaggregate
that process</b> (note by JCN: <i>the public sector conducting policy making)</i>
<b>and start to bring together new partnerships, new multistakeholder networks</b>"</span></div>
<div>- "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><b>And then companies also gave money through philanthropy and so on</b>": Ahah guys, there is some money to be
given to CS here!!!</span></div>
<div>- and the final touch "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><b>Because of the growing power of the digital revolution, companies have growing power, and
they need to step up and be full participants in society, which is why it’s so important that they understand the rise of these new multistakeholder networks—global solution networks—and participate in them</b>."</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is why MS is a danger to democracy. It pretends to replace a political system, and the citizens rights to be the ultimate decision makers - at least in democracies - thanks to their vote, and participation.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Think of all the niceties citizen had to fight against the private sector. We should just trust the private sector, thanks to new partnerships? We will end up with thousand of Erin Brokovich fighting all over the places, thanks to MS and its religious
belief that the private sector, co-decision maker in public policy will deliver some sort of 'enhanced democracy".</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No thanks!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>JC</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>From McKinsey</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: 'helvetica neue',helvetica,arial,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;">
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
<strong style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">The topic of business</strong> wasn’t on the table at the Bretton Woods Conference 70 years ago, when world leaders convened to determine how the international monetary and financial system would operate in the wake
of World War II. In this video interview with McKinsey’s Rik Kirkland, author and consultant Don Tapscott explains why today is different—and why business must play a central role in solving global problems. An edited transcript of Tapscott’s remarks follows.</p>
<h4 style="margin: 0px 0px 15px; padding: 13px 0px 0px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 1.384em; color: #e37222;">
Interview transcript</h4>
<h3 style="margin: 0px 0px 7px; padding: 13px 0px 0px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 1.231em; line-height: 1.25em; color: #000000;">
A new model for solving global problems</h3>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
There’s a fundamental change that’s underway in the way that we solve problems, cooperate, and govern ourselves on this little planet. And for 70 years, actually 70 years, dating back to 1944 in Bretton Woods, the model has been that states cooperate together
through diplomacy, state-based institutions, or through some kind of direct action to solve problems.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
And if you look at the world today, many of the problems that we have are not only stalled, they’re getting worse. So are they just too hard to solve, or is our model wrong? Well, enter a whole bunch of new factors: one of them is technology, and that’s radically
dropping transaction and collaboration costs. In the private sector, it’s leading to deep changes in the architecture and structure of the firm and of how we orchestrate capability to innovate, to create goods and services, and so on.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
In the public sector, it’s changing the way that we get capability to create public value. Why wouldn’t that affect the way that we get capability to solve the problems in the world? Why couldn’t we disaggregate that process and start to bring together new
partnerships, new multistakeholder networks?</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
A second thing that’s happening is we’ve got the rise of the new “pillars of society,” in addition to government. There were no corporations at Bretton Woods in 1944, because they weren’t viewed as being pillars of society. Companies were just these things
that made money for shareholders and created goods and services.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
There were also no NGOs<a rel="#footnote1" class="link-footnote" href="http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/The_flow_of_governance_An_interview_with_Don_Tapscott?cid=other-eml-alt-mgi-mck-oth-1405#" style="text-decoration: none; color: #0065bd; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><sup style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; font-family: 'helvetica neue',helvetica,arial,sans-serif; position: relative; top: -0.5em; font-size: 0.7em; z-index: 1;">1</sup></a> at
Bretton Woods, because there weren’t any. There were 50 NGOs in the world in 1944. Now we’ve got these new forces, and they’re coming together into something that’s very, very powerful. They’re multistakeholder networks, I call them global solution networks.
They’re engaging tens of thousands of organizations—companies, governments, civil society—and tens of millions of people on a daily basis.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
And they’re becoming material in the world. They’re attacking every problem that we have. And they’re creating wonderful new opportunities to address some of the big challenges facing the global community.</p>
<h3 style="margin: 0px 0px 7px; padding: 13px 0px 0px; font-weight: normal; font-size: 1.231em; line-height: 1.25em; color: #000000;">
The role of companies as citizens</h3>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
The existing institutions are being challenged by this new model, and the smart ones are embracing it. So the UN is starting to figure this out. There are a lot of people who say the UN is no longer fit for function and we should get rid of it and so on. I
disagree with that. States will be around for the foreseeable future, and we need them to cooperate together. And the UN is a key vehicle for that to occur.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
But the UN is beginning to embrace the multistakeholder model. And the big climate-change conference that’s coming up in September is going to be a true multistakeholder initiative with strong representation from government, civil society, and the private sector.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
This brings about some really big changes for business and how we think about business in the world. Corporations can now contribute in ways that were previously not possible. In the past, what did you do? You tried maybe to be a good company, although lots
didn’t. But increasingly, you’ve got to get good because of transparency—you’re going to get naked, and you’ve got to be buff. And then companies also gave money through philanthropy and so on.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
But now companies can be equal partners with governments and the civil society in bringing about change in the world, and this of course is critical to business because business can’t succeed in a world that’s failing. We need to have global prosperity. We
need to have economic development. We need to solve the problem of jobs. Youth unemployment is an epidemic in the world today.</p>
<p style="color: #333333; margin: 0px 0px 12px; padding: 0px; font-family: georgia,'times new roman',serif; line-height: 17px;">
Because of the growing power of the digital revolution, companies have growing power, and they need to step up and be full participants in society, which is why it’s so important that they understand the rise of these new multistakeholder networks—global solution
networks—and participate in them.</p>
</span></div>
<br>
<div>
<div>Le 2 mai 2014 à 16:01, Rafik a écrit :</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>Hi Norbert,<br>
<br>
If I understand the argument against Multistakeholderism I am hearing many times is to mainly aimed to prevent private sector from having any role. A position which de facto prevent civil society from having role at all. I guess that is just a side effect?
There are problems with private sector involvement but is is diverse stakeholder having SME and big corporate, preventing it from participation doesn't match democratic values you are mentioning .<br>
<br>
With the state-based model that you are defending, do you really think that Tunisian government during wsis 2005 was really representing Tunisian citizens? It will be just ironic while you are mentioning the right of people for self-determination. The state-based
model is heaven for all non democratic governments of the world ,and there are so many, because they will silence easily any possible dissent voicing at global level against their policies.<br>
<br>
Multistaholderism allowed me , the Tunisian and coming from developing region to participate in such process , but at least I have the decency to not pretend speaking for all the south and the marginalised of the world , I will stand against all those attempts
giving more rights to governments than their own citizens. <br>
<br>
Multistakeholderism need and can be improved but what you are defending cannot be improved at all.<br>
<br>
Rafik<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Le 2 May 2014 à 22:42, Norbert Bollow <<a href="mailto:nb@bollow.ch">nb@bollow.ch</a>> a écrit :<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">TA art. 35 is very very imperfect for a variety of reasons.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">It also was dangerous ten years ago in ways which are not a real danger<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">today.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Today it is IMO an immediate and concrete danger that carelessly<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">designed (and thereby non-democratic) multistakeholder public policy<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">processes could give big business the power to effectively undermine<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">the human right of the peoples to democratic self-determination.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">In the relevant international human rights treaty, the ICCPR, the legal<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">construct through which this human right is established is via the<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">public policy role of states: First it is declared that the peoples<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">have a right to self-determination, and later in the document the<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">right to democratic processes is established.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">I am not asserting that this state-based model is the only possible<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">model of democracy, but it is what we have. I certainly don't want to<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">forsake it before a proven alternative is available.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Until then I will support TA art. 35 with its privileging of states.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">From my perspective there is no need for Parminder to retract anything.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">I agree of course that there are currently very real problems almost<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">every time that states try to get involved in a privileged role as<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">states in Internet governance. And I'm not talking just about the<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">various examples of totally non-democratic states here.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">I propose to address these problems by means of measures such as those<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">proposed on <a href="http://wisdomtaskforce.org/">http://wisdomtaskforce.org/</a><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Greetings,<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Norbert<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">Am Fri, 2 May 2014 21:58:47 +0900<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">schrieb Adam Peake <<a href="mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp">ajp@glocom.ac.jp</a>>:<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Dear Parminder,<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">To the best of my knowledge, no civil society entity has supported<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">paragraph 35 of the Tunis Agenda (paragraph 49 Geneva Declaration of<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Principles.) It was the position of the Civil Society Plenary in<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Tunis that this language was unacceptable. To the best of my<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">knowledge this position has not changed. As recently as last week in<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Sao Paulo it was a matter that unified civil society: clearly we<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">oppose paragraph 35.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">So it was very surprising to read that you, as a representative of<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">civil society on the CSTD working group on enhanced cooperation<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">should support this language, and in doing so associate yourself with<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">business, Iran, Saudi Arabia, among others.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Please retract your comment supporting the Tunis Agenda text on roles<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">and responsibilities as copied below from the transcript. You have<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">time to do so before the WG finishes its meeting later today.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Paragraph 35 of the Tunis Agenda also below.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Please act immediately.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Thank you,<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Adam<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">PARMINDER JEET SINGH: THANK YOU, CHAIR. MY COMMENTS GO IN THE SAME<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">DIRECTION AS THE SPEAKER PREVIOUS TO ME, MARILYN, THAT IT SHOULD BE<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">RETAINED, THIS PARTICULAR PHRASE OF OUR RESPECTIVE ROLES AND<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">RESPONSIBILITIES AND TO JUSTIFY IT, I MAY ADD THAT THE TUNIS AGENDA<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">TALKS ABOUT THESE ROLES SPECIFICALLY IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">POLICY MAKING AND NOT GENERALLY IN VARIOUS OTHER SOCIAL ENTERPRISES<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">AND ACTIVITIES ALL OF US GET INVOLVED IN. AND THIS PARAGRAPH ALSO<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">ENDS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF ENHANCED COOPERATION WHICH IN MY AND MANY<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">PEOPLE'S UNDERSTANDING IS SPECIFICALLY ONLY ABOUT PUBLIC POLICY<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">MAKING. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">IT IS IN THIS REGARD, AT LEAST IN MY MIND, I HAVE CLARITY ABOUT WHAT<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">IS THE ROLE OF DIFFERENT STAKEHOLDERS BEING QUITE DIFFERENT TO ONE<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">ANOTHER AND I DON'T APPRECIATE THAT NON-GOVERNMENTAL ACTORS WOULD<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">HAVE THE SAME ROLE IN DECISION-MAKING MAKING THAN GOVERNMENTAL<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">ACTORS. THAT SHOULD NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT A GLOBAL LEVEL. THERE IS A<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">REASON FOR US TO INSIST ON IT BECAUSE I REMEMBER IN THE SECOND<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">MEETING, I SPECIFICALLY ASKED THE QUESTION ABOUT PEOPLE ASKING FOR<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">EQUAL ROLES AND ASKED WHETHER THEY REALLY ARE SEEKING AN EQUAL ROLE<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">IN PUBLIC POLICY MAKING. I ASKED IT FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">REPRESENTATIVE WHO THEN RESPONDED TO SAID I SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">PRIVATE SECTOR AND THEY SAY, YES, WE WANT TO AN EQUAL FOOTING OF<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">DECISION-MAKING. THIS IS PART OF THE MEETING. IT IS THIS PART OF<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">DEMOCRACY WHICH HAS ACUTELY BOTHERED US. I HAVE SAID THIS EARLIER.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">BUT I INSIST TO SAY THAT AGAIN BECAUSE THERE ARES INENCE ON -- THEIR<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">INSISTENCE ON ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES COMES BACK AND AGAIN. FOR ME<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">THAT IS IMPORTANT AND WE WOULD LIKE THAT PHRASE TO BE RETAINED. THANK<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">YOU. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">CHAIR MAJOR: THANK YOU, PARMINDER. <br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Tunis Agenda<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">35. We reaffirm that the management of the Internet encompasses both<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">technical and public policy issues and should involve all<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">stakeholders and relevant intergovernmental and international<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">organizations. In this respect it is recognized that: a) Policy<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">authority for Internet-related public policy issues is the sovereign<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">right of States. They have rights and responsibilities for<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">international Internet-related public policy issues. b) The private<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">sector has had, and should continue to have, an important role in the<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">development of the Internet, both in the technical and economic<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">fields. c) Civil society has also played an important role on<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Internet matters, especially at community level, and should continue<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">to play such a role. d) Intergovernmental organizations have had, and<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">should continue to have, a facilitating role in the coordination of<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">Internet-related public policy issues. e) International organizations<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">have also had and should continue to have an important role in the<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">development of Internet-related technical standards and relevant<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">policies.<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">____________________________________________________________<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"> <a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"> <a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a><br>
</blockquote>
____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:bestbits@lists.bestbits.net">bestbits@lists.bestbits.net</a>.<br>
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits">http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits</a></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>