<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000">
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">Hi everyone,</DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">To me one of the weakest sections of the
document is the paragraph dealing with surveillance issues (para 35 of the
Roadmap) which reads “<SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: ; WHITE-SPACE: normal; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; WORD-SPACING: 0px; FLOAT: none; COLOR: ; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: 25px; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
face=Arial><FONT color=#ca0000><SPAN
class=Apple-converted-space> </SPAN>Internet surveillance – Mass and
arbitrary surveillance undermines trust in the Internet and trust in the
Internet governance ecosystem. Surveillance of communications, their
interception, and the collection of personal data, including mass surveillance,
interception and collection should be conducted in accordance with states’
obligations under international human rights law. More dialogue is needed on
this topic at the international level using forums like IGF and the Human Rights
Council aiming to develop a common understanding on all the related
aspects”.</FONT></FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"><SPAN
style="FONT-FAMILY: ; WHITE-SPACE: normal; TEXT-TRANSFORM: none; WORD-SPACING: 0px; FLOAT: none; COLOR: ; DISPLAY: inline !important; LETTER-SPACING: normal; LINE-HEIGHT: 25px; TEXT-INDENT: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px"><FONT
color=#ca0000 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">This fairly weak language and action line
(more dialogue) is not surprising given the governmental input (including US
Government) into the drafting. So far the only comment on this is from me, where
I suggest reference to the necessaryandproportionate.org principles.
</DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">I think it would be useful if others
commented as individuals. Perhaps what we need is some better wording (which
perhaps governments would be embarrassed not to include), and which would
strengthen the response here. In any case, some wording and indication of level
of concern to ensure that this is discussed on the floor of the meeting rather
than simply passed by as an adequate wording would be useful!</DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">Ian Peter</DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word"> </DIV>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">The site for entering responses is <A
title=http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/
href="http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/">http://document.netmundial.br/2-roadmap-for-the-future-evolution-of-the-internet-governance/</A></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>