<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 15 March 2014 05:25 PM,
        McTim wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxiG6RZMtZVS1Cq4r+nXs=1aMTKpC=o2oquuB=_6HUpYYg@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
          <div class="gmail_extra">SNIP
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>If there is to be no more contract (the one that says
                that ICANN MUST be domiciled in the USA, then it has
                changed completely and ICANN is free to base itself
                anywhere.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div> </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">, unless of course
                  USG plans to give away that as well, which would be
                  really really appreciated... Any idea if that is
                  planned? <br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>they have just signaled their willingness for this to
                happen if I am not mistaken.</div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      This is interesting. So you say now ICANN may go anywhere it
      wishes to, it is upto the ICANN to do so. Hopefully, ICANN should
      apply to move to whichever country that gives it jurisdictional/
      legal immunity through some national level instrument (Switzerland
      ?), although finally some kind of international legal framework
      for sorting disputes etc will still be needed.<br>
      <br>
      So,  ICANN should tell the US that either it brings up a special
      legislation protecting it from US jurisdiction etc (not sure if
      this is constitutionally possible) or it moves to another place
      from where such an offer comes..<br>
      <br>
      parminder <br>
      <blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxiG6RZMtZVS1Cq4r+nXs=1aMTKpC=o2oquuB=_6HUpYYg@mail.gmail.com"
        type="cite">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>rgds,</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>McTim</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>