<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<font face="Verdana">On the other hand, I</font> also agree with
Bill that this may be too important a matter to be decided just by
the leadership of various CS groups.<br>
<br>
I propose that a vote be taken among membership of different groups
here whether CS will like to deal directly with Brazilian hosts in
the matter of participating in the Brazil meeting or go through the
1Net..<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:01 PM,
parminder wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:52BF0AFE.6070601@itforchange.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:52
PM, parminder wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:52BF08D1.2080404@itforchange.net"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<font face="Verdana">This is some interesting congruence of
views that is emerging..<br>
<br>
Can we hope that that 'responsibility holders' among us -
various committees, their heads, cocordinators of networks,
our appointed Liaisons, etc come out with their views and
stand on this issue..... <br>
</font></blockquote>
<br>
<font face="Verdana">and yes, of course those selected through
various processes for 1Net committees .... <br>
<br>
</font>
<blockquote cite="mid:52BF08D1.2080404@itforchange.net"
type="cite"><font face="Verdana"> <br>
parminder <br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Saturday 28 December 2013 10:40
PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+EjHYrXUsRpKQ_5rZkJvyKuJNXA0_jwKfPQKcDnvcogowRr_A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM,
William Drake <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:wjdrake@gmail.com" target="_blank">wjdrake@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on
this.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[snip]</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div><br>
<div>FWIW my view remains that if the networks
involved refuse to work through the 1net
mechanism to channel nominations to the
Brazilians, they should not have taken positions
on the 1net coordination committee, which to
date has one identifiable function— channeling
nominations to the Brazilians. If the view is
that because its launch and initial expiation
were not handled well 1net therefore has no
legitimacy as a channel, then the networks
shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign
from its coordination committee. I don’t share
that view of 1net, but if someone else does they
should behave according to their principles
rather than trying to have it both ways. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><b>+ 2<br>
</b>Louis <br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Bill</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>