<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Also, it is good idea to take note of 4. 2) in RFC1591, which says:<br>
    <br>
          The IANA is not in the business of deciding what is and what
    is<br>
          not a country.<br>
    <br>
          The selection of the ISO 3166 list as a basis for country code<br>
          top-level domain names was made with the knowledge that ISO
    has a<br>
          procedure for determining which entities should be and should
    not<br>
          be on that list.<br>
    <br>
    This is relevant, because the ICANN so many here to refer as an
    authority in this regard, at in fact a contractor to perform the
    IANA function. The real authority is IANA, and in it's original
    definition of it's TLD management policies it has said precisely the
    above. That document has never been revised, it is only interpreted
    from time to time (GAC Principles, the current FOI working group at
    ccNSO).<br>
    <br>
    The US Government has in fact delegated all of the "power" over DNS
    to IANA. Not impossible to influence it's decisions, but IANA
    performance has always been subject to much scrutiny by the
    community.<br>
    <br>
    Daniel<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13.12.13 08:33, CW Mail wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:BFF69F12-1A2B-4B6D-BFC8-84B0ED8D73B0@christopherwilkinson.eu"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/gac/gac-cctldprinciples-23feb00.htm">http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/gac/gac-cctldprinciples-23feb00.htm</a>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Good morning:</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I suggest that those participating in this discussion read
        the GAC ccTLD Principles.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Regards</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>CW</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
        <div><br>
          <div>
            <div>On 13 Dec 2013, at 00:25, Joanna Kulesza <<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:joannakulesza@GMAIL.COM">joannakulesza@GMAIL.COM</a>>
              wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>Hi everyone,<br>
                        <br>
                      </div>
                      as much as this is my very first post on the list,
                      the discussion is so riveting, I had to chip in,
                      with a question rather than an opinion really. <br>
                      <br>
                      Would the ICANN "power" you were discussing not
                      also be visible in the delegation/redelegation
                      policy? Not "taking the country offline" but
                      redelegating the management of the ccTLD to an
                      entitiy more... willing to colaborate with
                      ICANN/US? The case that always come to my mind
                      when we speak about ICANN "power" over the online
                      reflections of state sovereignty, that is the
                      ccTLDs, is the 2004 Haiti case: <a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/01/14/haiti_kisses_icann_ring_rewarded/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/01/14/haiti_kisses_icann_ring_rewarded/</a> 
                      or <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/26/0138212.Just">http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/26/0138212.Just</a>
                      for the sake of objectivity, here's the IANA take
                      on the case: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="http://www.iana.org/reports/2004/ht-report-13jan04.html">http://www.iana.org/reports/2004/ht-report-13jan04.html</a>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                  My question to the members of the list, should they
                  choose to answer it, is simple - was this a stricly
                  technical decision or would you consider it a
                  politically influenced one? Does the Haiti case stand
                  out? Are there any other examples of redelegation
                  decision viewed as controversial, like this one? Is
                  this a state sovereignty issue? Or not at all? <br>
                  <br>
                </div>
                Thank you, <br>
                Joanna Kulesza <br>
              </div>
              <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                <br>
                <div class="gmail_quote">2013/12/12 George Sadowsky <span
                    dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:george.sadowsky@gmail.com"
                      target="_blank">george.sadowsky@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
                  <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                    .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">All,<br>
                    <br>
                    Adam makes good points.<br>
                    <br>
                    I want to add something important that arises from
                    the case of Palestine.<br>
                    <br>
                    As you know, the ISO 3166 list, maintained by the
                    German National Statistical Organization, takes its
                    input from the Un Statistical Office (UNSO), which
                    has the authority to decide when an entry should be
                    included.  I worked in the UNSO from 1973-1986, and
                    at one point was designing a data base for county
                    statistics where the underlying country structure
                    was dynamic and changed over time as countries
                    merged and/or divided.  The issue was how to improve
                    statistical analysis when the underlying units of
                    observation changed composition.<br>
                    <br>
                    The specific case of Israeli statistics came up, and
                    I queried why Palestine was not considered to be a
                    statistical entity so that the statistical profile
                    of each entity could be more meaningful for
                    analytical purposes.  I was told that the decision
                    of what was or was not a state of territory was
                    political and not technical, and was communicated
                    from the political authorities at the UN.  That is
                    why Palestine was blocked and had to wait until 2000
                    to be added to the root as a legitimate territory.<br>
                    <br>
                    So there you have it.  The UN has the ultimate power
                    of deciding what 'country codes' go into the root,
                    not the US, and the UN uses it.<br>
                    <br>
                    George<br>
                    <br>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    On Dec 12, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Adam Peake wrote:<br>
                    <br>
                    > Comment below:<br>
                    ><br>
                    > On Dec 10, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Jovan Kurbalija
                    wrote:<br>
                    ><br>
                    >> Here are a few comments in line with JK<br>
                    >><br>
                    >> So what you are saying is that the UN could
                    tell the US to stop<br>
                    >> serving the records for a ccTLD and the US
                    could then tell VRSN (by<br>
                    >> court order?) to delete that ccTLD?<br>
                    >><br>
                    ><br>
                    ><br>
                    > This potential of the U.S. deleting a ccTLD has
                    been worried over since the earliest days of WSIS.
                    But there have been wars and ccTLDs haven't been
                    touched (.iq/Iraq). North Korea .KP works ok <<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.naenara.com.kp/en/"
                      target="_blank">http://www.naenara.com.kp/en/</a>>.
                     Palestine, .PS delegated in 2000 and redelegated
                    2004.  U.S. hasn't edited them out of the root zone,
                    so it seems we shouldn't worry too much.  However,
                    whatever we think the U.S. might do or not do, this
                    issue is unlikely to go away.  It might be helpful
                    to codify what looks like de facto policy, something
                    like: 'The U.S. government will not unilaterally
                    remove any TLD from the root.' (Write that up in
                    nice language).<br>
                    ><br>
                    > This could be one of the topics for the meeting
                    in Brazil next April, discussions that might
                    kick-off a process to develop and agree a policy
                    statement on root operations.  Not going to agree
                    anything much in two days, but might be able to
                    agree on a charter of a working group to come up
                    proposals/recommendations. A working group that
                    reports progress and outcomes within the IGF
                    process: first in Istanbul a few months later, then
                    back to Brazil for the IGF in 2015 where any
                    agreement might be reviewed by a broader community.
                     Might make it part of a larger effort looking at
                    the Internationalization of the IANA, if that's a
                    topic for Brazil next year -- and I think it should
                    be one of the topics.  More on this in another
                    email.<br>
                    ><br>
                    > Adam<br>
                    ><br>
                    ><br>
                    >> JK: Sanctions cannot be adopted without the
                    US support. Any action under UN Chapter VII,
                    including sanctions,  must be agreed by the all 5
                    permanent members of the Security Council (<a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml"
                      target="_blank">http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter7.shtml</a>).<br>
                    >><br>
                    >><br>
                    >> If that is the case, and VRSN complied
                    (which I think they would fight<br>
                    >> BTW) then it would be a UN "power" and the
                    US would just be an agent<br>
                    >> of the UN?<br>
                    >><br>
                    >> JK: If the USA, like any other state,
                    adopts certain UN convention or policy, it has
                    obligation to implement it.  If the USA supports
                    decision on sanctions against certain country, it
                    should implement the sanction regime.<br>
                    >><br>
                    >><br>
                    ><br>
                    ><br>
                    >
                    ____________________________________________________________<br>
                    > You received this message as a subscriber on
                    the list:<br>
                    >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                    > To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                    >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
                      target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
                    ><br>
                    > For all other list information and functions,
                    see:<br>
                    >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
                      target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
                    > To edit your profile and to find the IGC's
                    charter, see:<br>
                    >     <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
                    ><br>
                    > Translate this email: <a
                      moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
                      target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
____________________________________________________________<br>
                    You received this message as a subscriber on the
                    list:<br>
                         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
                    To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing"
                      target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
                    <br>
                    For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
                         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance"
                      target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
                    To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter,
                    see:<br>
                         <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
                    <br>
                    Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t"
                      target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                <br clear="all">
                <br>
                -- <br>
                Joanna Kulesza
              </div>
____________________________________________________________<br>
              You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
              To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
              <br>
              For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
              To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://www.igcaucus.org/">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
              <br>
              Translate this email: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>