<div dir="ltr">This was a very interesting exhange. It's a pity that we are so scattered in different lists, that the dialogue about similar issues is becoming broken in parallel tracks. Milton, I have two doubts:<div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div style="direction:ltr;font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma">
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Times New Roman"><div class="im">
<div style="direction:ltr"><br></div></div><div>
<div>Two possible roles. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. One would be to provide a generic legal framework (e.g., incorporation law for nonprofits or INGOs). With that in place governments can simply formally recognize a non-state MS process as authoritative in its domain and then stay out of it. </div>
</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In your view, what would be the domains or the thematic areas suitable for that? In addition, would there be a space for governmental frameworks that do not only aim to "organize" the scenario, but also to provide substantive guidelines, or general principles on the public interest? My question would be if governments would still be able to occasionally intervene when problems arise, such as deviation from public interest, monopolies, unjustifiable asymmetries, etc</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="direction:ltr;font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma"><div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Times New Roman">
<div>
<div>2. Govts can also be 'stakeholders' and participate as 'stakeholders' but only if they abandon the pretense of being a unitary actor, disaggregate their representation, and allow any and every agency to pursue its organizational self-interest in an open
MS process. </div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Every governmental agency or department? What about the coherence that governments must strive to pursuit? Ideally, the "best position" comes after counterposing different positions of different Ministers. In your proposal, we would disregard the important of this internal dialogue. So then? Internal Ministers would do foreign policy? What if gov end up moving completely different agendas in different bodies, depending on which department is participating? How to ensure a stable regime? </div>
<div><br></div><div>I thought at first that you were talking about disaggregating State's internal stakeholder groups - ex: having national CS, business participating in their capacity, more or less like ILO, but with bottom-up choice of representatives. The problem is what is "national" business or CS?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Marília</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="direction:ltr;font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma"><div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Times New Roman">
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div><b>Marília Maciel</b></div><div><font color="#444444">Pesquisadora Gestora</font></div><div><font color="#444444">Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - </font><span style="color:rgb(68,68,68)">FGV Direito Rio</span></div>
<div><font color="#444444"><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666">Researcher and Coordinator</font></div><div><font color="#666666">Center for Technology & Society - </font><span style="color:rgb(102,102,102)">FGV Law School</span></div>
<div><font color="#666666"><a href="http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts" target="_blank">http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts</a><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666"><br></font></div><div><font color="#666666">DiploFoundation associate</font></div>
<div><font color="#666666"><a href="http://www.diplomacy.edu" target="_blank">www.diplomacy.edu</a></font></div><div><font color="#666666"><br></font></div><div><br><div><br></div></div></div>
</div></div></div>