<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Tuesday 01 October 2013 06:34 PM,
McTim wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxi11yDxh5HzKmMDeYzyaXtPQHicu3=Ye3P-8XO7u8rwDA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Louis Pouzin (well) <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pouzin@well.com"><pouzin@well.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Incidentally, the title includes multilateral, a word that has already
produced loads of heated debates in connection with multistakeholder. In
this context the choice seems intentional.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Probably...many of the articles in the Hindu that have been posted in
the last year or so use rhetoric similar to that we have seen on this
list.
Perhaps, in the interests of transparency, PJS can tell us if he is
ghostwriting or acting as a source for the Hindu?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
McTim, If you were a little less jumpy to reach conclusions and/ or
make insinuations, as Michael Gurstein has repeated ticked you for,
you would have noticed the name and title of the author at the end
of the The Hindu's article. Does he sound like a candidate for my
ghost-writing.... To quote the end of the article<br>
<br>
"<i>(Jorge Heine is CIGI professor of global governance at the
Balsillie School of International Affairs, Wilfrid Laurier
University in Waterloo, Ontario. He tweets at </i>@jorgeheinel<i>)</i>
"<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACAaNxi11yDxh5HzKmMDeYzyaXtPQHicu3=Ye3P-8XO7u8rwDA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Predictably, some in CS have already seen the dangers of multilateralism:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.ifex.org/international/2013/09/25/online_surveillance/">http://www.ifex.org/international/2013/09/25/online_surveillance/</a>
"Privacy International and Bytes for All reject this call for more
regulation of the internet, which should remain free, independent and
open for all to use. The statement is a transparent attempt by these
countries to limit the flow and exchange of information, thus putting
at risk other rights, including the right to privacy and freedom of
expression. "
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Another expression is governance of the world wide web (WWW). While WWW is
as fuzzy as internet, one may wonder if there is any specific intention in
this less common expression.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
perhaps.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>