<div dir="ltr">A recording of the arguments are available - it's a good listen!<font face="yw-b3b03f93acb29dde874548d979c14638352bd06e-638a3a7038016d359ab40e6dd5efadc1--o" style></font><div><br></div><div>See <a href="http://isoc-ny.org/p2/5915">http://isoc-ny.org/p2/5915</a></div>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com" target="_blank">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Dear All,</div><div><br></div><div>I just found out that on the 9th September, 2013, the DC Federal Appeals Court heard Verizon's challenge to FCC's open internet order, see below.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Wish I was in DC to have sat in to hear the saline arguments.</div><div><br></div><div>See below for more information.</div><div><br></div><div>Kind Regards,</div><div>Sala<br><br>Sent from my iPad</div>
<div><br>Begin forwarded message:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><b>From:</b> Manoj Ranchord <<a href="mailto:mranchord@yahoo.co.nz" target="_blank">mranchord@yahoo.co.nz</a>><br><b>Date:</b> September 14, 2013, 6:59:19 AM GMT+12:00<br>
<b>To:</b> "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <<a href="mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com" target="_blank">salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro@gmail.com</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> <b>Fw: The Gilder Friday Letter</b><br>
<br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top"><div>FYI - some commentary on net neutrality.<br><br>Ps. This is a good source for alternative view from predominant opinion.</div>
</td></tr></tbody></table> <div>
<div>
<br>
<div>
<div style="font-size:0.9em">
<hr size="1">
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
</b>
Forbes Newsletters <<a href="mailto:newsletters@forbes.com" target="_blank">newsletters@forbes.com</a>>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
</b>
<<a href="mailto:mranchord@yahoo.co.nz" target="_blank">mranchord@yahoo.co.nz</a>>; <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
</b>
The Gilder Friday Letter v.567.0 <br>
<b>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
</b>
Fri, Sep 13, 2013 1:00:34 PM <br>
</div>
<br>
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<img width="1" height="1">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="700" align="center">
<tbody><tr><td align="left" width="700">
<p align="center">_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
<strong>— THE FRIDAY LETTER —</strong><br>
<em>(emailed weekly, from Gilder Publishing, LLC <br>
for Forbes friends and subscribers)</em><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<br>
| <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/3455" target="_blank">http://www.gilder.com/</a> | Issue 568.0/September 13, 2013<br>
<br>
<strong>LIKE US ON FACEBOOK</strong><br><a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/56718#!/GilderFridayLetter" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/#!/GilderFridayLetter </a>
</p><p style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em">
HEADLINES: <br><br>
- The Week / A Decade Later, Net Neutrality Goes to Court<br>
- Friday Feature / A Decade Later, Net Neutrality Goes to Court<br>
- Blogger Bonus / The Growth Experiment Revisited<br>
- Readings / <br>
</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="619">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="619" valign="top" bgcolor="#dddddd" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-right:15px;padding-left:15px"><br>
<p style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em"><strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/57897?ie=UTF8&qid=%20gilderpublish-20" target="_blank"><em>Knowledge and Power: The Information Theory of</em><br>
<em>Capitalism and How it is Revolutionizing our World</em></a> <br>
<br>
</strong>Ronald Reagan's most–quoted living author—George Gilder—is back with an all–new paradigm–shifting theory of capitalism that will upturn conventional wisdom, just when our economy desperately needs a new direction. <br>
<br>
<strong>ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY </strong><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/57897?ie=UTF8&qid=%20gilderpublish-20" target="_blank">http://www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Power-Information-Capitalism-Revolutionizing/dp/1621570274/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=%20gilderpublish-20 </a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p style="margin:1em 0em 1em 0em"><u><strong>The Week</strong></u> / A Decade Later, Net Neutrality Goes to Court<br><br>
<strong>BRET SWANSON, Maximum Entropy</strong> <em>(09/09/13)</em>: Today the D.C. Federal Appeals Court hears Verizon's challenge to the Federal Communications Commission's "Open Internet Order" — better known as "net neutrality."<br>
<br>
Hard to believe, but we've been arguing over net neutrality for a decade. I just pulled up some testimony George Gilder and I prepared for a Senate Commerce Committee hearing in April 2004. In it, we asserted that a newish "horizontal layers" regulatory proposal, then circulating among comm–law policy wonks, would become the next big tech policy battlefield. Horizontal layers became net neutrality, the Bush FCC adopted the non-binding Four Principles of an open Internet in 2005, the Obama FCC pushed through actual regulations in 2010, and now today's court challenge, which argues that the FCC has no authority to regulate the Internet and that, in fact, Congress told the FCC not to regulate the Internet.<br>
<br>
Over the years we've followed the debate, and often weighed in. Here's a sampling of our articles, reports, reply comments, and even some doggerel:<br><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61813" target="_blank">"CBS–Time Warner Cable Spat Shows (Once Again) Why 'Net Neutrality' Won't Work"</a> – by Bret Swanson – August 9, 2013<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/60149" target="_blank">"Verizon, ESPN, and the Future of Broadband"</a> – by Bret Swanson – <em><a href="http://Forbes.com" target="_blank">Forbes.com</a></em> – June 4, 2013<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61814" target="_blank">"The Internet Survives, and Thrives, For Now"</a> – by Bret Swanson – RealClearMarkets – December 6, 2010<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61815" target="_blank">"Reply Comments to the FCC's Open Internet Further Inquiry"</a> – by Bret Swanson – November 4, 2010<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61816" target="_blank">"Net Neutrality, Investment, and Jobs: Assessing the Potential Impact on the Broadband Ecosystem"</a> – by Charles M. Davidson and Bret T. Swanson, Advanced Communications Law and Policy Institute, New York Law School, June 16, 2010<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61817" target="_blank">"Reply Comments in the FCC Matter of 'Preserving the Open Internet'"</a> – by Bret Swanson – April 26, 2010<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61816" target="_blank"> "What Would Net Neutrality Mean for U.S. Jobs?"</a> – by Bret Swanson – February 5, 2010<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61818" target="_blank">"Net Neutrality's Impact on Internet Innovation"</a> – prepared for the New York City Council – by Bret Swanson – November 20, 2009<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61819" target="_blank">"Google and the Problem With 'Net Neutrality'"</a> – by Bret Swanson, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, October 5, 2009<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61820" target="_blank">"Leviathan Spam"</a> – by Bret Swanson – A whimsical take on "Net Neutrality" – September 23, 2009<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61821?mod=opinion_main_commentaries" target="_blank">"Unleashing the 'Exaflood'"</a> – by Bret Swanson and George Gilder, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, February 22, 2008<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61822" target="_blank">"The Coming Exaflood"</a> – by Bret Swanson, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, January 20, 2007<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61823" target="_blank">"Let There Be Bandwidth"</a> – by Bret Swanson, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, March 7, 2006<br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61824" target="_blank">"Testimony For Telecommunications Policy: A Look Ahead"</a> – testimony before the Senate Commerce Committee – by George Gilder – April 28, 2004
<br>
<br>
<strong>More from Bret Swanson:</strong><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/15576" target="_blank">http://www.bretswanson.com/</a><br>
<br>
<strong>REGISTER FOR A FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO THE FRIDAY LETTER:</strong><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/30179" target="_blank">http://nct.digitalriver.com/fulfill/0165.035</a></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="619">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="619" valign="top" bgcolor="#dddddd" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-left:15px;padding-right:15px"><br>
<strong>WEALTH & POVERTY: A New Edition for the 21st Century <br>
<br>
</strong>The <em>New York Times</em> bestseller <em>Wealth and Poverty</em> by <strong>George Gilder</strong> is one of the most famous economic books of all time and has sold more than one million copies since its first release. <br>
<br>
In the new, completely updated, edition, Gilder compares America's current economic challenges with her past economic problems, and explains why Obama's big–government, redistributive policies are doing more harm than good. <em>Wealth and Poverty</em> (2012) offers solutions to America's current economic problems and hope to those who fear that our best days are behind us.<strong> <br>
<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/54962?ie=UTF8&qid=gilderpublish-20" target="_blank">Order Your Copy Today!</a></strong><br>
<br></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p style="margin:1em 0em 1em 0em"><u><strong>Friday Feature</strong></u> /Israeli Companies Are On Sale<br><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/23099?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=ProductDetailsPage&SiteID=es_764&productID=73310400&pgm=11198600" target="_blank">Gilder Telecosm Forum</a> <strong>MEMBER</strong> <em>(09/09/13)</em>: George, Please give us a futurist's view of what we should be investing in. Thanks in advance for your reply.<br>
<br>
<strong>GEORGE GILDER</strong>, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/23099?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=ProductDetailsPage&SiteID=es_764&productID=73310400&pgm=11198600" target="_blank">Gilder Telecosm Forum </a><em>(09/10/13)</em>: I'll work on it, though my noggin is mostly full of information theory these days. The environment for small and mid–sized tech is ferocious. Now that the EPA has effectively banned nanotech, regarding carbon nanotubes as a new form of asbestos, and network neutrality threatens the Internet, I might have to resort to biotech, as long as it remains legal (genetic modification, eek!).<br>
<br>
Meanwhile, I'll make do with my usual suspects, most of which you can buy more cheaply than ever. I would particularly note that great Israeli companies such as the cloud security paragon <strong>RADW</strong> are on sale. <strong>EZCH</strong> is still the best semiconductor company in the world and an even better stock because it remains widely unrecognized; <strong>TSEM</strong> is still the best analog play and also even cheaper despite its increasingly stable finances; <strong>CGEN</strong> is no longer in the bargain basement but is worth a bet; <strong>EVGN.TA</strong> remains attractive; <strong>INTC</strong> is an Israeli company in disguise and is on sale despite its world leading fabs and attractive Moore's Law double dividends; <strong>AMD</strong> spearheads graphics processors and will gain with clouds; <strong>ADSK</strong> seems well valued but it is the leader in 3D CAD and moving into the cloud with ever ascendant and unique
software from <strong>Otoy</strong>; and <strong>AUDC</strong> is now better valued but it is a survivor at layer–five at a time when everything is becoming sessions…
<br>
<br>
<strong>Read more posts by George Gilder and the Telecosm Forum members by logging on to the</strong> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/23099?Action=DisplayPage&Locale=en_US&id=ProductDetailsPage&SiteID=es_764&productID=73310400&pgm=11198600" target="_blank">Gilder Telecosm Forum</a> <strong>with your subscriber password at</strong> <a rel="nofollow">www.gildertech.com.</a><br>
<br>
<strong>REGISTER FOR A FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO THE FRIDAY LETTER:</strong><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/30179" target="_blank">http://nct.digitalriver.com/fulfill/0165.035</a>
</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="619">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="619" valign="top" bgcolor="#dddddd" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding-right:15px;padding-left:15px"><br>
<p style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em"><strong>The Israel Test: Why the World's Most Besieged State<br>
is a Beacon of Freedom and Hope for the World Economy
</strong>
<br><br>
Have you ever wondered why, in our time, it is the Left that leads the attack on Israel? After reading<em> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/6840?ie=UTF8&tag=gilderpublish-20" target="_blank">The Israel Test</a></em> you will never wonder again. George Gilder's brilliant work definitively shows how America's ability and desire to defend Israel will define our survival as a nation:<em> "If Israel is destroyed, capitalist Europe will likely die as well, and America, as the epitome of productive and creative capitalism spurred by Jews, will be in jeopardy."</em> <br>
<br>
<strong><a rel="nofollow">ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY</a></strong> [<em>Now in Paperback!</em>]<br>
</p></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p style="margin:1em 0em 1em 0em"><strong><u>Blogger Bonus</u></strong> / The Growth Experiment Revisited<br><br>
<strong>STEPHEN MOORE, Wall Street Journal Book Review of "The Growth Experiment Revisited", By Lawrence Lindsey</strong><em> (09/09/13)</em>: When Ronald Reagan endorsed the idea of supply–side tax cuts in 1981, he turned 50 years of economic orthodoxy on its head. Even Republicans like Sen. Howard Baker of Tennessee, who voted for the cuts, called it "a riverboat gamble." What followed was a quarter–century of nearly unprecedented wealth creation and technological progress. America's net worth exploded by nearly $40 trillion in these years, and nearly 40 million Americans were added to business payrolls.<br>
<br>
Now, in the wake of the great recession of 2008–09 and the fifth year of the most meager of Keynesian "recoveries," it is a good time to re–explore how supply–side policies set America on the prosperity path in the go–go years of the 1980s and '90s. This is what Lawrence Lindsey's "The Growth Experiment Revisited" sets out to do. <br>
<br>
The 1980s boom was launched on the simple insight that, by lowering tax rates and regulatory hurdles and juicing the incentives to produce, innovate and take risks, the animal spirits of the American free–enterprise system would revive. Two seminal books hatched the supply–side revolution. The first was Jude Wanniski's "The Way the World Works" (1978); the second, George Gilder's <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/57897?ie=UTF8&qid=%20gilderpublish-20" target="_blank">"Wealth and Poverty"</a> (1981).<br>
<br>
Almost as influential, coming a few years later, was Lawrence Lindsey's "The Growth Experiment" (1990). Slightly academic in nature, it was the first book to quantify the economic and revenue windfall of the 1981 Reagan across–the–board tax cuts. Mr. Lindsey's conclusion was that Reagan's 1981 tax act quickened the pace of production, which reduced the predicted revenue loss. His research found that although the Reagan tax cuts didn't "pay for themselves," the ones at the highest end of the income spectrum "did produce a revenue gain" because of "changes in taxpayer behavior." He concluded that "the core supply–side tenet—that tax rates powerfully affect the willingness of taxpayers to work, save and invest, and thereby also affect the health of the economy—won as stunning a vindication as has been seen in at least a half–century of economics."<br>
<br>
He has now updated his book, taking us through the booms and busts of the past 20 years. It is a valuable project in part because Mr. Lindsey was a front–seat economic adviser to George W. Bush, serving as director of the National Economic Council and as one of the architects of the often–maligned 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts. <br>
<br>
Mr. Lindsey's central claim is that those tax changes saved the economy from the undertow of the financial meltdown at the end of the Clinton presidency. The bursting of the high–tech bubble in 1999–2000, which tends to be forgotten, was followed by the turmoil and economic upheaval after 9/11. Mr. Lindsey makes a convincing case that Mr. Bush doesn't receive nearly the credit he deserves for steering the economy clear of a mini–depression in the early 2000s. The economic revival of 2003–07 wasn't particularly speedy, but it looks impressive today when compared with the dismal results of Obamanomics. <br>
<br>
The purpose of the tax cuts, Mr. Lindsey writes, was "to provide a cushion for the economy when the bubble burst." They were designed as an "insurance policy" against a downturn. The author says that he was driven by a lesson, impressed upon him by then Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, not to repeat the policy mistakes after the 1929 stock market crash, when taxes and tariffs were raised in 1930 and 1931. They only exacerbated the length and severity of the Depression.<br>
<br>
Mr. Lindsey writes that the Bush tax cut in 2001 was "a standard Keynesian remedy for a recession" but "with a supply–side twist," and that it helped avert a deeper recession. "The economy began to recover as soon as the tax–cut checks hit," he insists. Those policies consisted mainly of tax rebates, credits and a slow phase–down of rates (to a 35% maximum). On the opinion pages of this newspaper we have questioned the bang–for–the–buck quality of the 2001 tax package, arguing that, contrary to Mr. Lindsey's claim, the rebates and credits bumped up consumption in only a minor and temporary way and that what was needed was permanent tax–rate reductions to encourage investment and work. It is true that the economy revived in 2001 and 2002, but only haltingly. <br>
<br>
The real economic sparkplug was the 2003 investment–tax cut, which lowered the rate on capital gains and dividends. Not only did growth accelerate, but stocks rose in value—as Mr. Lindsey had predicted—and revenues to the federal government exploded by nearly $800 billion until 2008, when the bursting of the housing bubble sent the economy into the intensive–care unit.<br>
<br>
For all the moaning about growing deficits under Mr. Bush, Mr. Lindsey defends the record of the president he worked for: The cumulative debt during Mr. Bush's two terms, he notes, added $2 trillion—or less than the amount Barack Obama borrowed in his first two years in office. This is true, though it ignores the fact that Mr. Bush left behind a deficit that was headed to $1 trillion in 2009 no matter who became president. Mr. Lindsey sees vindication in Mr. Obama's decision to extend the Bush tax cuts for everyone in 2011 and for "99 percent of all taxpayers" in 2013.<br>
<br>
The puzzle of Mr. Lindsey is that one of the most prominent defenders of supply–side economics and lower tax rates is also a disciple of demand–side economics: He believes that, in times of recession, Keynesian fiscal policies designed to increase overall demand will help steer an economy back on the growth path. Both tax cuts and spending increases, he says, "may be sensible as counter–cyclical policies."<br>
<br>
That isn't everyone's reading of history, of course. What is beyond dispute, after reading Mr. Lindsey's book, is that tax rates have a direct effect on the health of the economy, a lesson that the current Obama administration has chosen to ignore.
<br>
<br>
Comment On This:
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324123004579055323264287530.html" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324123004579055323264287530.html</a>
<br>
__________________________________________<br>
<strong><br>
Like The Gilder Friday Letter on Facebook:</strong><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/39498?v=wall" target="_blank">http://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Gilders-Friday-Letter/215657745111042?v=wall</a><br>
__________________________________________</p>
<p><strong><u>Readings</u></strong> / <br>
<br>
ABC's Monday Night Football Offers Essential Lesson In Economics<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61825" target="_blank">http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2013/09/08/abcs-monday-night-football-offers-an-essential-lesson-in-economics/ </a><br>
<br>
Hey GOP! Get Smart Fighting Obamacare<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61826" target="_blank">http://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2013/09/04/hey-gop-get-smart-fighting-obamacare/ </a><br>
<br>
John Scully Just Gave His Most Detailed Account of How Steve Jobs Got Fired From Apple<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61827" target="_blank">http://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2013/09/09/john-sculley-just-gave-his-most-detailed-account-ever-of-how-steve-jobs-got-fired-from-apple/ </a><br>
<br>
Startup Culture is Killing Innovation<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61828" target="_blank">http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/09/why-do-research-when-you-can-fail-fast-pivot-and-act-out-other-popular-startup-cliches/ </a><br>
<br>
Wall Street Give New iPhone Thumbs Down<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/61829" target="_blank">http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/09/11/wall-street-gives-apples-new-iphones-thumbs-down/ </a>
________________________________ <br>
</p>
<p style="margin:1em 0em 1em 0em">
<strong>ADVERTISING INFORMATION</strong> <br>
The Friday Letter is emailed each week to 100,000–plus subscribers and friends of Gilder Publishing, including industry leaders, financial professionals and individual investors. For information about advertising, contact Diane Schmid at <a rel="nofollow">dschmid@forbes.com.</a><br>
<br>
<strong>FEEDBACK AND PROBLEMS</strong><br>
For technical problems, or to send letters to the editor, please e-mail <a rel="nofollow">info@gilder.com</a>. </p>
<p style="margin:0em 0em 1em 0em">MAILING ADDRESS<br>
Gilder Publishing, LLC<br>
ATTN: Friday Letter <br>
291A Main Street<br>
Great Barrington, MA 01230<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
<em><br>
The Friday Letter</em> is published weekly for subscribers and friends of Gilder Publishing. If someone you know would enjoy it, please feel free to forward a copy.<br><br>
Gilder Publishing makes the Friday Letter available for free. To help defray some of the costs of producing this information on a weekly basis, we will from time to time be sending you offers from companies we think you'll be interested in. These offers will not come more than once a week. If you do not wish to receive this related information, please opt out of this process at the link below and we will not share your name with companies outside of Gilder Publishing. <br>
<br>
To SUBSCRIBE please visit <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/30179" target="_blank">http://nct.digitalriver.com/fulfill/0165.035</a> <br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE please go to:<br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/news/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6/1/35286" target="_blank">http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/Sub/40/0/31sbhcqKtgqfp2Kzz7zK5qpcz2zK0rizKzf7s3</a> <br>
<br>
Copyright 2013 Gilder Publishing LLC</p>
</td></tr></tbody></table>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#999999" size="1">You are receiving this email as an opted-in subscriber to Forbes Newsletters. You are on our mailing list as: <a rel="nofollow">mranchord@yahoo.co.nz</a> </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#999999" size="1">
<br><br>If you do not want to receive email offers from <strong>Forbes Newsletters</strong> in the future, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://forbes-news.psmessage.com/Sub/40/0/5ekofaaCxhzoa2Cbdl2Ce2cz9a1Cs8m2Cffsj6" target="_blank">click here</a>.</font>
<br><br><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#999999" size="1">You may also email your opt-out request to <a rel="nofollow">privacyadmin@forbes.com</a>
<br>or send your request in the mail directly to Forbes Inc. <br><br>Attn: Privacy Administrator 60 Fifth Ave 8th Floor New York, NY 10011.</font><br><br>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" color="#999999" size="1">Please click below to review our privacy policy: <br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.forbes.com/fdc/privacy.html" target="_blank">http://www.forbes.com/fdc/privacy.html</a><p> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.puresend.com/3sc" target="_blank"><img width="100" alt="Powered by Puresend" border="0"></a>
</p></font></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br>____________________________________________________________<br>
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:<br>
<a href="mailto:governance@lists.igcaucus.org">governance@lists.igcaucus.org</a><br>
To be removed from the list, visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing</a><br>
<br>
For all other list information and functions, see:<br>
<a href="http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance" target="_blank">http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance</a><br>
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:<br>
<a href="http://www.igcaucus.org/" target="_blank">http://www.igcaucus.org/</a><br>
<br>
Translate this email: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate_t" target="_blank">http://translate.google.com/translate_t</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>---------------------------------------------------------------<br>Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast<br>WWWhatsup NYC - <a href="http://wwwhatsup.com" target="_blank">http://wwwhatsup.com</a><br>
<a href="http://pinstand.com" target="_blank">http://pinstand.com</a> - <a href="http://punkcast.com" target="_blank">http://punkcast.com</a><br> VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - <a href="http://isoc-ny.org" target="_blank">http://isoc-ny.org</a><br>
--------------------------------------------------------------<br>-
</div>