<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Wednesday 31 July 2013 05:20 AM,
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:14031fd5fcc.2728.4f968dcf8ecd56c9cb8acab6370fcfe0@hserus.net"
type="cite">She does not approve, you say
<br>
<br>
She does not disapprove, you say.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Precisely. And when I voice my concern about a civil society member
of the MAG, as the oversight body over IGF program etc, taking such
a neutral/ inactive position, I am told off by a series of personal
invectives. Not done, and I would not take it. <br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:14031fd5fcc.2728.4f968dcf8ecd56c9cb8acab6370fcfe0@hserus.net"
type="cite">
<br>
And then you report her responding to your personal attack to the
co cos.
<br>
<br>
It would be interesting to see what the co cos think here.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I am too. Meanwhile if it has escaped the co cos notice, I cut paste
the relevant portions of my email below...<br>
<br>
<blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<br>
You tend to twist people's words in order to score political
points,
<br>
Parminder. I find this tendency, and your general readiness to
launch
<br>
into attack, very disappointing coming from someone (and an
<br>
organisation) whose views I generally respect.
(Anriette)<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I refer these ad hominem comment to the co-coordinators for their
views and decisions. I will wait for a week, till the 6th of
August, to be told what views they have on these comments and
whether they propose any action. If I dont get any response or get
a response that no action is contemplated, I will proceed to
express my views on what I think 'Anriette does' on this list in a
similarly unconstrained manner as she has expressed personalised
views about me...
(Parminder)<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
(cut paste ends)<br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:14031fd5fcc.2728.4f968dcf8ecd56c9cb8acab6370fcfe0@hserus.net"
type="cite">
<br>
--srs (htc one x)
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 30 July 2013 10:52:12 PM parminder
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net"><parminder@itforchange.net></a> wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
On Tuesday 30 July 2013 10:35 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
<br>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:24:45PM +0530, parminder
(<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:parminder@itforchange.net">parminder@itforchange.net</a>) wrote:
<br>
>
<br>
>> On Tuesday 30 July 2013 01:33 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen
wrote:
<br>
>>> Dear Parminder
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> I did not say there is "nothing wrong with the
document".
<br>
>> Anriette
<br>
>>
<br>
>> Your email to which I responded ends as follows
<br>
>>
<br>
>> " It seems that people feel the Idonesian organising
committee is
<br>
>> selling influence in turn for sponsorship, but don't
really see
<br>
>> evidence of that beyond the standard 'indirect'
influence of
<br>
>> branding."
<br>
>> It is absolutely appropriate then for me to say that it
is your
<br>
>> position that there is nothing wrong with the
Indonesian organising
<br>
>> group's strategy or with the concerned document . I
repeat it.
<br>
>> Please justify how your above comment means anything
else.
<br>
> Parminder,
<br>
>
<br>
> No offence intended but I'm utterly unable to understand
how
<br>
> you can interpret Anriette's words the way you do.
<br>
> I don't see anything in her words you're quoting as
<br>
> indicating an approval of what the Indonesian group did.
<br>
Tapani
<br>
<br>
I did not speak of her approving, only of her not disapproving
('nothing wrong with'), which is what her words clearly amount
to. ... ... parminder
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>